IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v9y2021i7p126-d587826.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving Explainability of Major Risk Factors in Artificial Neural Networks for Auto Insurance Rate Regulation

Author

Listed:
  • Shengkun Xie

    (Global Management Studies, Ted Rogers School of Management, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada)

Abstract

In insurance rate-making, the use of statistical machine learning techniques such as artificial neural networks (ANN) is an emerging approach, and many insurance companies have been using them for pricing. However, due to the complexity of model specification and its implementation, model explainability may be essential to meet insurance pricing transparency for rate regulation purposes. This requirement may imply the need for estimating or evaluating the variable importance when complicated models are used. Furthermore, from both rate-making and rate-regulation perspectives, it is critical to investigate the impact of major risk factors on the response variables, such as claim frequency or claim severity. In this work, we consider the modelling problems of how claim counts, claim amounts and average loss per claim are related to major risk factors. ANN models are applied to meet this goal, and variable importance is measured to improve the model’s explainability due to the models’ complex nature. The results obtained from different variable importance measurements are compared, and dominant risk factors are identified. The contribution of this work is in making advanced mathematical models possible for applications in auto insurance rate regulation. This study focuses on analyzing major risks only, but the proposed method can be applied to more general insurance pricing problems when additional risk factors are being considered. In addition, the proposed methodology is useful for other business applications where statistical machine learning techniques are used.

Suggested Citation

  • Shengkun Xie, 2021. "Improving Explainability of Major Risk Factors in Artificial Neural Networks for Auto Insurance Rate Regulation," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-21, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:9:y:2021:i:7:p:126-:d:587826
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/9/7/126/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/9/7/126/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roel Verbelen & Katrien Antonio & Gerda Claeskens, 2018. "Unravelling the predictive power of telematics data in car insurance pricing," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(5), pages 1275-1304, November.
    2. Shengkun Xie, 2019. "Defining Geographical Rating Territories in Auto Insurance Regulation by Spatially Constrained Clustering," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-20, April.
    3. Evgenii V. Gilenko & Elena A. Mironova, 2017. "Modern claim frequency and claim severity models: An application to the Russian motor own damage insurance market," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 1311097-131, January.
    4. Parodi, Pietro, 2012. "Computational intelligence with applications to general insurance: a review," Annals of Actuarial Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(2), pages 344-380, September.
    5. Parodi, Pietro, 2012. "Computational intelligence with applications to general insurance: a review," Annals of Actuarial Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(2), pages 307-343, September.
    6. Dionne, Georges & Gouriéroux, Christian & Vanasse, Charles, 1998. "Evidence of adverse selection in automobile insurance markets," Working Papers 98-9, HEC Montreal, Canada Research Chair in Risk Management.
    7. Edward Frees, 1998. "Relative Importance of Risk Sources in Insurance Systems," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(2), pages 34-49.
    8. Hsiao, Cheng & Kim, Changseob & Taylor, Grant, 1990. "A statistical perspective on insurance rate-making," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 44(1-2), pages 5-24.
    9. Maria Kovacova & Tomas Kliestik & Katarina Valaskova & Pavol Durana & Zuzana Juhaszova, 2019. "Systematic review of variables applied in bankruptcy prediction models of Visegrad group countries," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 10(4), pages 743-772, December.
    10. Søren Asmussen & Reuven Y. Rubinstein, 1999. "Sensitivity Analysis of Insurance Risk Models via Simulation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(8), pages 1125-1141, August.
    11. Mercedes Ayuso & Montserrat Guillen & Jens Perch Nielsen, 2019. "Improving automobile insurance ratemaking using telematics: incorporating mileage and driver behaviour data," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 735-752, June.
    12. Shengkun Xie & Anna T. Lawniczak, 2018. "Estimating Major Risk Factor Relativities in Rate Filings Using Generalized Linear Models," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-14, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shengkun Xie & Rebecca Luo, 2022. "Measuring Variable Importance in Generalized Linear Models for Modeling Size of Loss Distributions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-19, May.
    2. Mogens Steffensen, 2022. "Special Issue “Risks: Feature Papers 2021”," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-2, March.
    3. Julia V. Ragulina & Stanislav E. Prokofyev & Tatyana V. Bratarchuk, 2021. "Managing the Risks of Innovative Activities Focused on the Consumer Market: Competitiveness vs. Corporate Responsibility," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-14, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roland R. Ramsahai, 2020. "Connecting actuarial judgment to probabilistic learning techniques with graph theory," Papers 2007.15475, arXiv.org.
    2. Shengkun Xie & Chong Gan, 2023. "Estimating Territory Risk Relativity Using Generalized Linear Mixed Models and Fuzzy C -Means Clustering," Risks, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-20, May.
    3. Alfiero, Simona & Battisti, Enrico & Ηadjielias, Elias, 2022. "Black box technology, usage-based insurance, and prediction of purchase behavior: Evidence from the auto insurance sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    4. Iqbal Owadally & Feng Zhou & Douglas Wright, 2018. "The Insurance Industry as a Complex Social System: Competition, Cycles and Crises," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 21(4), pages 1-2.
    5. Laura Grassi, 2024. "In a world of Open Finance, are customers willing to share data? An analysis of the data-driven insurance business," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 14(3), pages 727-753, September.
    6. Marjan Qazvini, 2019. "On the Validation of Claims with Excess Zeros in Liability Insurance: A Comparative Study," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-17, June.
    7. Jennifer S. K. Chan & S. T. Boris Choy & Udi Makov & Ariel Shamir & Vered Shapovalov, 2022. "Variable Selection Algorithm for a Mixture of Poisson Regression for Handling Overdispersion in Claims Frequency Modeling Using Telematics Car Driving Data," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-10, April.
    8. Donatella Porrini & Giulio Fusco & Cosimo Magazzino, 2020. "Black boxes and market efficiency: the effect on premiums in the Italian motor-vehicle insurance market," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 455-472, June.
    9. Shengkun Xie, 2019. "Defining Geographical Rating Territories in Auto Insurance Regulation by Spatially Constrained Clustering," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-20, April.
    10. Meng, Shengwang & Gao, Yaqian & Huang, Yifan, 2022. "Actuarial intelligence in auto insurance: Claim frequency modeling with driving behavior features and improved boosted trees," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 115-127.
    11. Shengkun Xie, 2024. "Analyzing the Influence of Telematics-Based Pricing Strategies on Traditional Rating Factors in Auto Insurance Rate Regulation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-23, October.
    12. Banghee So & Jean-Philippe Boucher & Emiliano A. Valdez, 2021. "Synthetic Dataset Generation of Driver Telematics," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-19, March.
    13. Vikas Chauhan & Rohit Joshi & Vipin Choudhary, 2024. "Understanding intention to adopt telematics-based automobile insurance in an emerging economy: a mixed-method approach," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(3), pages 1017-1036, September.
    14. Jean-Philippe Boucher & Roxane Turcotte, 2020. "A Longitudinal Analysis of the Impact of Distance Driven on the Probability of Car Accidents," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-19, September.
    15. Dionne, G. & Doherty, N., 1991. "Adverse Selection In Insurance Markets: A Selective Survey," Cahiers de recherche 9105, Centre interuniversitaire de recherche en économie quantitative, CIREQ.
    16. Dionne, Georges, 1998. "La mesure empirique des problèmes d’information," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 74(4), pages 585-606, décembre.
    17. Rafael Becerra-Vicario & David Alaminos & Eva Aranda & Manuel A. Fernández-Gámez, 2020. "Deep Recurrent Convolutional Neural Network for Bankruptcy Prediction: A Case of the Restaurant Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-15, June.
    18. Deprez, Laurens & Antonio, Katrien & Boute, Robert, 2021. "Pricing service maintenance contracts using predictive analytics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(2), pages 530-545.
    19. Adriana Csikosova & Maria Janoskova & Katarina Culkova, 2020. "Application of Discriminant Analysis for Avoiding the Risk of Quarry Operation Failure," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-14, September.
    20. Cocozza, R & Di Lorenzo, E & Sibillo, M, 2004. "Methodological problems in solvency assessment of an insurance company," MPRA Paper 27980, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:9:y:2021:i:7:p:126-:d:587826. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.