IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v9y2021i3p49-d513033.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Alleviating Class Imbalance in Actuarial Applications Using Generative Adversarial Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Kwanda Sydwell Ngwenduna

    (School of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics, University of the Witwatersrand, West Campus, Mathematical Sciences Building, Private Bag 3, Wits, Braamfontein 2050, South Africa
    DSI-NICIS National e-Science Postgraduate Teaching and Training Platform (NEPTTP), Wits, Braamfontein 2050, South Africa)

  • Rendani Mbuvha

    (School of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of the Witwatersrand, West Campus, Mathematical Sciences Building, Private Bag 3, Wits, Braamfontein 2050, South Africa)

Abstract

To build adequate predictive models, a substantial amount of data is desirable. However, when expanding to new or unexplored territories, this required level of information is rarely always available. To build such models, actuaries often have to: procure data from local providers, use limited unsuitable industry and public research, or rely on extrapolations from other better-known markets. Another common pathology when applying machine learning techniques in actuarial domains is the prevalence of imbalanced classes where risk events of interest, such as mortality and fraud, are under-represented in data. In this work, we show how an implicit model using the Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) can alleviate these problems through the generation of adequate quality data from very limited or highly imbalanced samples. We provide an introduction to GANs and how they are used to synthesize data that accurately enhance the data resolution of very infrequent events and improve model robustness. Overall, we show a significant superiority of GANs for boosting predictive models when compared to competing approaches on benchmark data sets. This work offers numerous of contributions to actuaries with applications to inter alia new sample creation, data augmentation, boosting predictive models, anomaly detection, and missing data imputation.

Suggested Citation

  • Kwanda Sydwell Ngwenduna & Rendani Mbuvha, 2021. "Alleviating Class Imbalance in Actuarial Applications Using Generative Adversarial Networks," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-33, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:9:y:2021:i:3:p:49-:d:513033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/9/3/49/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/9/3/49/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Takaya Saito & Marc Rehmsmeier, 2015. "The Precision-Recall Plot Is More Informative than the ROC Plot When Evaluating Binary Classifiers on Imbalanced Datasets," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-21, March.
    2. McCullagh, Peter, 1984. "Generalized linear models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 285-292, June.
    3. Carter, Lawrence R. & Lee, Ronald D., 1992. "Modeling and forecasting US sex differentials in mortality," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 393-411, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Szymon Kubiak & Tillman Weyde & Oleksandr Galkin & Dan Philps & Ram Gopal, 2023. "Improved Data Generation for Enhanced Asset Allocation: A Synthetic Dataset Approach for the Fixed Income Universe," Papers 2311.16004, arXiv.org.
    2. Ricardo Mu~noz-Cancino & Cristi'an Bravo & Sebasti'an A. R'ios & Manuel Gra~na, 2022. "Assessment of creditworthiness models privacy-preserving training with synthetic data," Papers 2301.01212, arXiv.org.
    3. Solveig Flaig & Gero Junike, 2022. "Scenario Generation for Market Risk Models Using Generative Neural Networks," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-28, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lanza Queiroz, Bernardo & Lobo Alves Ferreira, Matheus, 2021. "The evolution of labor force participation and the expected length of retirement in Brazil," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 18(C).
    2. Christopher J Greenwood & George J Youssef & Primrose Letcher & Jacqui A Macdonald & Lauryn J Hagg & Ann Sanson & Jenn Mcintosh & Delyse M Hutchinson & John W Toumbourou & Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz &, 2020. "A comparison of penalised regression methods for informing the selection of predictive markers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-14, November.
    3. Gong, Guan & Webb, Anthony, 2010. "Evaluating the Advanced Life Deferred Annuity -- An annuity people might actually buy," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 210-221, February.
    4. Carter, Lawrence R., 1998. "Combining probabilistic and subjective assessments of error to provide realistic appraisals of demographic forecast uncertainty: Alho's approach," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 14(4), pages 523-526, December.
    5. Groneck, Max & Ludwig, Alexander & Zimper, Alexander, 2016. "A life-cycle model with ambiguous survival beliefs," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 137-180.
    6. Kogure Atsuyuki & Fushimi Takahiro, 2018. "A Bayesian Pricing of Longevity Derivatives with Interest Rate Risks," Asia-Pacific Journal of Risk and Insurance, De Gruyter, vol. 12(1), pages 1-30, January.
    7. Bucciol, Alessandro & Cavalli, Laura & Fedotenkov, Igor & Pertile, Paolo & Polin, Veronica & Sartor, Nicola & Sommacal, Alessandro, 2017. "A large scale OLG model for the analysis of the redistributive effects of policy reforms," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 104-127.
    8. Li, Han & Hyndman, Rob J., 2021. "Assessing mortality inequality in the U.S.: What can be said about the future?," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 152-162.
    9. Le, Hong Hanh & Viviani, Jean-Laurent, 2018. "Predicting bank failure: An improvement by implementing a machine-learning approach to classical financial ratios," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 16-25.
    10. de Jong, Piet & Tickle, Leonie & Xu, Jianhui, 2020. "A more meaningful parameterization of the Lee–Carter model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 1-8.
    11. João Chang Junior & Fábio Binuesa & Luiz Fernando Caneo & Aida Luiza Ribeiro Turquetto & Elisandra Cristina Trevisan Calvo Arita & Aline Cristina Barbosa & Alfredo Manoel da Silva Fernandes & Evelinda, 2020. "Improving preoperative risk-of-death prediction in surgery congenital heart defects using artificial intelligence model: A pilot study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, September.
    12. Wang, Wei & Xu, Huifu & Ma, Tiejun, 2023. "Optimal scenario-dependent multivariate shortfall risk measure and its application in risk capital allocation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(1), pages 322-347.
    13. Edouard Debonneuil & Anne Eyraud-Loisel & Frédéric Planchet, 2018. "Can Pension Funds Partially Manage Longevity Risk by Investing in a Longevity Megafund?," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-27, July.
    14. Peter Stephensen, 2013. "The Danish Microsimulation Model SMILE – An overview," DREAM Working Paper Series 201305, Danish Rational Economic Agents Model, DREAM.
    15. Emilio Zagheni & Raya Muttarak & Erich Striessnig, 2015. "Differential mortality patterns from hydro-meteorological disasters: Evidence from cause-of-death data by age and sex," Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, Vienna Institute of Demography (VID) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences in Vienna, vol. 13(1), pages 47-70.
    16. Mason, Carl N. & Miller, Timothy, 2018. "International projections of age specific healthcare consumption: 2015–2060," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 12(C), pages 202-217.
    17. Tengyuan Liang & Weijie J. Su, 2019. "Statistical inference for the population landscape via moment‐adjusted stochastic gradients," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 81(2), pages 431-456, April.
    18. Arthur De Sá Ferreira & Ney Meziat-Filho & Ana Paula Antunes Ferreira, 2021. "Double threshold receiver operating characteristic plot for three-modal continuous predictors," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 2231-2245, September.
    19. Li, Johnny Siu-Hang, 2010. "Pricing longevity risk with the parametric bootstrap: A maximum entropy approach," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 176-186, October.
    20. Ahbab Mohammad Fazle Rabbi & Stefano Mazzuco, 2021. "Mortality Forecasting with the Lee–Carter Method: Adjusting for Smoothing and Lifespan Disparity," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 37(1), pages 97-120, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:9:y:2021:i:3:p:49-:d:513033. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.