IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v11y2023i11p199-d1280888.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Domain Knowledge Features versus LASSO Features in Predicting Risk of Corporate Bankruptcy—DEA Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Martina Mokrišová

    (Faculty of Management and Business, University of Prešov, Konštantínova 16, 080 01 Prešov, Slovakia)

  • Jarmila Horváthová

    (Faculty of Management and Business, University of Prešov, Konštantínova 16, 080 01 Prešov, Slovakia)

Abstract

Predicting the risk of corporate bankruptcy is one of the most important challenges for researchers dealing with the issue of financial health evaluation. The risk of corporate bankruptcy is most often assessed with the use of early warning models. The results of these models are significantly influenced by the financial features entering them. The aim of this paper was to select the most suitable financial features for bankruptcy prediction. The research sample consisted of enterprises conducting a business within the Slovak construction industry. The features were selected using the domain knowledge (DK) approach and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO). The performance of VRS DEA (Variable Returns to Scale Data Envelopment Analysis) models was assessed with the use of accuracy, ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristics) curve, AUC (Area Under the Curve) and Somers’ D. The results show that the DK+DEA model achieved slightly better AUC and Somers’ D compared to the LASSO+DEA model. On the other hand, the LASSO+DEA model shows a smaller deviation in the number of identified businesses on the financial distress frontier. The added value of this research is the finding that the application of DK features achieves significant results in predicting businesses’ bankruptcy. The added value for practice is the selection of predictors of bankruptcy for the analyzed sample of enterprises.

Suggested Citation

  • Martina Mokrišová & Jarmila Horváthová, 2023. "Domain Knowledge Features versus LASSO Features in Predicting Risk of Corporate Bankruptcy—DEA Approach," Risks, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:11:y:2023:i:11:p:199-:d:1280888
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/11/11/199/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/11/11/199/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Psillaki, Maria & Tsolas, Ioannis E. & Margaritis, Dimitris, 2010. "Evaluation of credit risk based on firm performance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(3), pages 873-881, March.
    2. Lee, Chia-Yen & Cai, Jia-Ying, 2020. "LASSO variable selection in data envelopment analysis with small datasets," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    3. Zeineb Affes & Rania Hentati-Kaffel, 2019. "Predicting US Banks Bankruptcy: Logit Versus Canonical Discriminant Analysis," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-03045837, HAL.
    4. Yi Cao & Xiaoquan Liu & Jia Zhai & Shan Hua, 2022. "A two‐stage Bayesian network model for corporate bankruptcy prediction," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(1), pages 455-472, January.
    5. Ohlson, Ja, 1980. "Financial Ratios And The Probabilistic Prediction Of Bankruptcy," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(1), pages 109-131.
    6. L. Lin & J. Piesse, 2004. "Identification of corporate distress in UK industrials: a conditional probability analysis approach," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 73-82.
    7. du Jardin, Philippe, 2015. "Bankruptcy prediction using terminal failure processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(1), pages 286-303.
    8. Zeineb Affes & Rania Hentati-Kaffel, 2019. "Predicting US Banks Bankruptcy: Logit Versus Canonical Discriminant Analysis," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 54(1), pages 199-244, June.
    9. Khurram Ajaz Khan & Robert Dankiewicz & Yana Kliuchnikava & Judit Olah, 2020. "How Do Entrepreneurs Feel Bankruptcy?," International Journal of Entrepreneurial Knowledge, Center for International Scientific Research of VSO and VSPP, vol. 8(1), pages 89-101, June.
    10. Paramonovs Sergejs & Ijevleva Ksenija, 2015. "The Role of Marketing Tools in the Improvement of Consumers Financial Literacy," Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 27(1), pages 40-45, December.
    11. Koh, SzeKee & Durand, Robert B. & Dai, Lele & Chang, Millicent, 2015. "Financial distress: Lifecycle and corporate restructuring," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 19-33.
    12. Seiford, Lawrence M. & Zhu, Joe, 2002. "Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(1), pages 16-20, October.
    13. Frydman, Halina & Altman, Edward I & Kao, Duen-Li, 1985. "Introducing Recursive Partitioning for Financial Classification: The Case of Financial Distress," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 40(1), pages 269-291, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Youssef Zizi & Amine Jamali-Alaoui & Badreddine El Goumi & Mohamed Oudgou & Abdeslam El Moudden, 2021. "An Optimal Model of Financial Distress Prediction: A Comparative Study between Neural Networks and Logistic Regression," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-24, November.
    2. Elena Gregova & Katarina Valaskova & Peter Adamko & Milos Tumpach & Jaroslav Jaros, 2020. "Predicting Financial Distress of Slovak Enterprises: Comparison of Selected Traditional and Learning Algorithms Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-17, May.
    3. du Jardin, Philippe, 2015. "Bankruptcy prediction using terminal failure processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(1), pages 286-303.
    4. Tamás Kristóf & Miklós Virág, 2020. "A Comprehensive Review of Corporate Bankruptcy Prediction in Hungary," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, February.
    5. Şaban Çelik, 2013. "Micro Credit Risk Metrics: A Comprehensive Review," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(4), pages 233-272, October.
    6. Manuel D. N. T. Oliveira & Fernando A. F. Ferreira & Guillermo O. Pérez-Bustamante Ilander & Marjan S. Jalali, 2017. "Integrating cognitive mapping and MCDA for bankruptcy prediction in small- and medium-sized enterprises," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(9), pages 985-997, September.
    7. Youssef Zizi & Mohamed Oudgou & Abdeslam El Moudden, 2020. "Determinants and Predictors of SMEs’ Financial Failure: A Logistic Regression Approach," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-21, October.
    8. Philippe Jardin & David Veganzones & Eric Séverin, 2019. "Forecasting Corporate Bankruptcy Using Accrual-Based Models," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 54(1), pages 7-43, June.
    9. Citterio, Alberto, 2024. "Bank failure prediction models: Review and outlook," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    10. Magdalena Brygała, 2022. "Consumer Bankruptcy Prediction Using Balanced and Imbalanced Data," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-13, January.
    11. Zeineb Affes & Rania Hentati-Kaffel, 2019. "Predicting US Banks Bankruptcy: Logit Versus Canonical Discriminant Analysis," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 54(1), pages 199-244, June.
    12. Şaban Çelik & Bora Aktan & Bruce Burton, 2022. "Firm dynamics and bankruptcy processes: A new theoretical model," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(3), pages 567-591, April.
    13. Maria H. Kim & Graham Partington, 2015. "Dynamic forecasts of financial distress of Australian firms," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 40(1), pages 135-160, February.
    14. Pablo de Llano Monelos & Manuel Rodríguez López & Carlos Piñeiro Sánchez, 2013. "Bankruptcy Prediction Models in Galician companies. Application of Parametric Methodologies and Artificial Intelligence," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(1), pages 117-136.
    15. Catherine Refait, 2004. "La prévision de la faillite fondée sur l’analyse financière de l’entreprise : un état des lieux," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 162(1), pages 129-147.
    16. Casado Yusta, Silvia & Nœ–ez Letamendía, Laura & Pacheco Bonrostro, Joaqu’n Antonio, 2018. "Predicting Corporate Failure: The GRASP-LOGIT Model || Predicci—n de la quiebra empresarial: el modelo GRASP-LOGIT," Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa = Journal of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, vol. 26(1), pages 294-314, Diciembre.
    17. Ruey-Ching Hwang & K. F. Cheng & Jack C. Lee, 2007. "A semiparametric method for predicting bankruptcy," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(5), pages 317-342.
    18. Foo See Liang & Shaak Pathak, 2019. "Understanding the Connection of Performance and Z-Scores for Manufacturing Firms in South Korea," Journal of Asian Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 5(3), pages 37-46, November.
    19. repec:zbw:bofrdp:2009_035 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Demyanyk, Yuliya & Hasan, Iftekhar, 2010. "Financial crises and bank failures: A review of prediction methods," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 315-324, October.
    21. M. A. Lagesh & Maram Srikanth & Debashis Acharya, 2018. "Corporate Performance during Business Cycles: Evidence from Indian Manufacturing Firms," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 19(5), pages 1261-1274, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:11:y:2023:i:11:p:199-:d:1280888. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.