IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jresou/v9y2020i6p75-d374352.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Combining Energy Management Indicators and Life Cycle Assessment Indicators to Promote Sustainability in a Paper Production Plant

Author

Listed:
  • Edwin Espinel Blanco

    (Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Francisco de Paula Santander, Vía Acolsure, Sede el Algodonal Ocaña, Ocaña-Norte de Santander 546552, Colombia)

  • Guillermo Valencia Ochoa

    (Programa de Ingeniería Mecánica, Universidad del Atlántico, Carrera 30 Número 8-49, Puerto Colombia, Barranquilla 080007, Colombia)

  • Jorge Duarte Forero

    (Programa de Ingeniería Mecánica, Universidad del Atlántico, Carrera 30 Número 8-49, Puerto Colombia, Barranquilla 080007, Colombia)

Abstract

This paper presents the application of an energy characterization method based on the ISO 50001 standard in a dry paper production plant. This plant operates using electricity, gas, and coal as energy sources. The last two energy sources are used to produce the steam and hot air used in the paper drying process. Through energy characterization, indicators such as energy baseline and consumption indicators were calculated for the plant, with which improvement opportunities were identified. These improvement opportunities were used as case studies for each energy source used and were based on the actual state of the plant. 2011 Midpoint+ ILCD method data was selected from the Ecoinvent database, using OpenLCA 1.7.0 for the energy assessment. The impact categories analyzed in this study were ecotoxicity, eutrophication of rivers and seas, climate change, and human toxicity. As a result of this work, it was found that energy-saving was possible by adjusting the production rate to a load factor of 77%, which implies a gas consumption of 1.6 kWh/kg and a value in the climate change category of 88.5 kg of CO 2 equivalent. In addition, some technological improvement opportunities were economical and environmentally evaluated as a result of the sustainable improvement strategy implemented with energy management and life cycle assessment. The study of these technological opportunities showed that in order to achieve a sustainable industrial process, it is important to take into account energy, economic, and environmental criteria in the continuous improvement of the paper production process. In addition, it is of vital importance to analyze alternatives for technological change, which have a greater impact than operational alternatives according to energy, environmental and economic criteria.

Suggested Citation

  • Edwin Espinel Blanco & Guillermo Valencia Ochoa & Jorge Duarte Forero, 2020. "Combining Energy Management Indicators and Life Cycle Assessment Indicators to Promote Sustainability in a Paper Production Plant," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-21, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:9:y:2020:i:6:p:75-:d:374352
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/9/6/75/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/9/6/75/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guillermo Valencia Ochoa & Jhan Piero Rojas & Jorge Duarte Forero, 2020. "Advance Exergo-Economic Analysis of a Waste Heat Recovery System Using ORC for a Bottoming Natural Gas Engine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Guillermo Valencia & Aldair Benavides & Yulineth Cárdenas, 2019. "Economic and Environmental Multiobjective Optimization of a Wind–Solar–Fuel Cell Hybrid Energy System in the Colombian Caribbean Region," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-19, June.
    3. Guillermo Valencia Ochoa & Carlos Acevedo Peñaloza & Jorge Duarte Forero, 2019. "Thermo-Economic Assessment of a Gas Microturbine-Absorption Chiller Trigeneration System under Different Compressor Inlet Air Temperatures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Lizhong Tong & Zhongmin Pu & Jizheng Ma, 2019. "Maintenance Supplier Evaluation and Selection for Safe and Sustainable Production in the Chemical Industry: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, March.
    5. Cheng, Guishi & Zhao, Ying & Pan, Shijiu & Wang, Xiaoqiang & Dong, Changqing, 2020. "A comparative life cycle analysis of wheat straw utilization modes in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    6. Alberto Díaz de Junguitu & Erlantz Allur, 2019. "The Adoption of Environmental Management Systems Based on ISO 14001, EMAS, and Alternative Models for SMEs: A Qualitative Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-17, December.
    7. Virgile Aymard & Valerie Botta-Genoulaz, 2017. "Normalisation in life-cycle assessment: consequences of new European factors on decision-making," Post-Print hal-01787845, HAL.
    8. P. Pablo Poveda-Orjuela & J. Carlos García-Díaz & Alexander Pulido-Rojano & Germán Cañón-Zabala, 2019. "ISO 50001: 2018 and Its Application in a Comprehensive Management System with an Energy-Performance Focus," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-33, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Milena Nebojsa Rajić & Rado M. Maksimović & Pedja Milosavljević, 2022. "Energy Management Model for Sustainable Development in Hotels within WB6," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-19, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dora Villada-Castillo & Guillermo Valencia-Ochoa & Jorge Duarte-Forero, 2023. "Thermohydraulic and Economic Evaluation of a New Design for Printed Circuit Heat Exchangers in Supercritical CO 2 Brayton Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-24, February.
    2. Edwin Espinel Blanco & Guillermo Valencia Ochoa & Jorge Duarte Forero, 2020. "Thermodynamic, Exergy and Environmental Impact Assessment of S-CO 2 Brayton Cycle Coupled with ORC as Bottoming Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-24, May.
    3. Ivan CK Tam & Brian Agnew, 2020. "Thermal Systems—An Overview," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-3, December.
    4. Fabio Fatigati & Marco Di Bartolomeo & Davide Di Battista & Roberto Cipollone, 2020. "Experimental Validation of a New Modeling for the Design Optimization of a Sliding Vane Rotary Expander Operating in an ORC-Based Power Unit," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-23, August.
    5. Raluca-Andreea Felseghi & Ioan Așchilean & Nicoleta Cobîrzan & Andrei Mircea Bolboacă & Maria Simona Raboaca, 2021. "Optimal Synergy between Photovoltaic Panels and Hydrogen Fuel Cells for Green Power Supply of a Green Building—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, June.
    6. Wu, Juanjuan & Zhang, Jian & Yi, Weiming & Cai, Hongzhen & Li, Yang & Su, Zhanpeng, 2022. "Agri-biomass supply chain optimization in north China: Model development and application," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    7. Daniel Icaza & David Borge-Diez & Santiago Pulla Galindo & Carlos Flores-Vázquez, 2020. "Modeling and Simulation of a Hybrid System of Solar Panels and Wind Turbines for the Supply of Autonomous Electrical Energy to Organic Architectures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-27, September.
    8. Milena Nebojsa Rajić & Rado M. Maksimović & Pedja Milosavljević, 2022. "Energy Management Model for Sustainable Development in Hotels within WB6," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-19, December.
    9. Helena Bulińska-Stangrecka & Anna Bagieńska, 2021. "Culture-Based Green Workplace Practices as a Means of Conserving Energy and Other Natural Resources in the Manufacturing Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-21, October.
    10. Shivani Guru & D. K. Mahalik, 2019. "A comparative study on performance measurement of Indian public sector banks using AHP-TOPSIS and AHP-grey relational analysis," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 56(4), pages 1213-1239, December.
    11. Hessam Taherian & Robert W. Peters, 2023. "Advanced Active and Passive Methods in Residential Energy Efficiency," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-19, May.
    12. Alexander Melnik & Kirill Ermolaev, 2020. "Strategy Context of Decision Making for Improved Energy Efficiency in Industrial Energy Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-28, March.
    13. Esra Yalcin & Gokcen Alev Ciftcioglu & Burcin Hulya Guzel, 2023. "Human Factors Analysis by Classifying Chemical Accidents into Operations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-16, May.
    14. Dinulescu Ruxandra & Dobrin Cosmin, 2022. "Applying the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process for classifying and prioritizing healthcare quality attributes," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 15-40, March.
    15. Yee Van Fan & Zorka Novak Pintarič & Jiří Jaromír Klemeš, 2020. "Emerging Tools for Energy System Design Increasing Economic and Environmental Sustainability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-25, August.
    16. Jun Zhang & Yanmin Li & Lin Mei & Xiaoliang Yu & Xun Lv & Jinping Wang & Jin Yan & Rongyue Sun, 2023. "Study on the Effect of Secondary Air Layout on CO Reduction Performance in a 75 t/h Biomass CFB Boiler Burning Wheat Straw," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-15, April.
    17. Chun-Ho Chen, 2019. "A New Multi-Criteria Assessment Model Combining GRA Techniques with Intuitionistic Fuzzy Entropy-Based TOPSIS Method for Sustainable Building Materials Supplier Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, April.
    18. Zhen Tian & Yingying Yue & Yuan Zhang & Bo Gu & Wenzhong Gao, 2020. "Multi-Objective Thermo-Economic Optimization of a Combined Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) System Based on Waste Heat of Dual Fuel Marine Engine and LNG Cold Energy Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-23, March.
    19. Rocio Carrillo-Labella & Fatiha Fort & Manuel Parras-Rosa, 2020. "Motives, Barriers, and Expected Benefits of ISO 14001 in the Agri-Food Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, February.
    20. Xu Ping & Baofeng Yao & Hongguang Zhang & Hongzhi Zhang & Jia Liang & Meng Yuan & Kai Niu & Yan Wang, 2022. "Comprehensive Performance Assessment of Dual Loop Organic Rankine Cycle (DORC) for CNG Engine: Energy, Thermoeconomic and Environment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-28, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:9:y:2020:i:6:p:75-:d:374352. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.