IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jresou/v12y2023i6p73-d1175060.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Administration and Landowners Facing Real Estate Cadastre Modernization: A Win-Lose or Win-Win Situation?

Author

Listed:
  • Malgorzata Busko

    (Department of Integrated Geodesy and Cartography, AGH University of Science and Technology, 30-059 Kraków, Poland)

  • Michal Apollo

    (Institute of Earth Sciences, University of Silesia in Katowice, 40-007 Katowice, Poland
    Global Justice Program, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
    Center for Tourism Research, Wakayama University, Wakayama 640-8510, Japan)

Abstract

Keeping the real estate cadastre’s database up to date is a very important process. The scope of the modernization works includes, among other things, fieldwork and office (chamber) work carried out by surveyors to update information about land and buildings. Therefore, modernization may result in changes to plot areas; changes to the marking of plots and land use (and, consequently, a change in the property tax); and the disclosure or deletion of buildings and premises, as well as changes to their technical data. The research, based on a case study (rural municipality Serniki, Poland), and supported by a literature review, remote sensing, and digital photogrammetry, clearly showed the importance of initiating the cadastre modernization procedure and obtaining funds for this purpose, which will be beneficial for both parties. Landowners will gain by bringing the current image of their real estate closer to the actual state (e.g., by paying taxes for the real utility of the land), while administrative units will become the beneficiaries of higher tax revenues (up to over 500%). Thus, the analysis carried out on the case study shows positive effects for both parties, and justifies the financial outlay incurred by the administrative units for this process. Moreover, the analysis revealed that, due to the possibility of obtaining funding from other sources, the cost to the public administration may be marginal. Thus, the cadastre modernization procedure should be integrated into regional and national policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Malgorzata Busko & Michal Apollo, 2023. "Public Administration and Landowners Facing Real Estate Cadastre Modernization: A Win-Lose or Win-Win Situation?," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:12:y:2023:i:6:p:73-:d:1175060
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/12/6/73/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/12/6/73/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mika, Monika, 2018. "An analysis of possibilities for the establishment of a multipurpose and multidimensional cadastre in Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 446-453.
    2. Malgorzata Busko & Beata Szafranska, 2018. "Analysis of Changes in Land Use Patterns Pursuant to the Conversion of Agricultural Land to Non-Agricultural Use in the Context of the Sustainable Development of the Malopolska Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, January.
    3. Didem Dizdaroglu, 2017. "The Role of Indicator-Based Sustainability Assessment in Policy and the Decision-Making Process: A Review and Outlook," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-28, June.
    4. Kurowska, Krystyna & Kryszk, Hubert & Marks-Bielska, Renata & Mika, Monika & Leń, Przemysław, 2020. "Conversion of agricultural and forest land to other purposes in the context of land protection: Evidence from Polish experience," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    5. Miodrag Roić & Josip Križanović & Doris Pivac, 2021. "An Approach to Resolve Inconsistencies of Data in the Cadastre," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, January.
    6. Ercan, Orhan, 2023. "Evolution of the cadastre renewal understanding in Türkiye: A fit-for-purpose renewal model proposal," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    7. Dawidowicz, Agnieszka & Źróbek, Ryszard, 2018. "A methodological evaluation of the Polish cadastral system based on the global cadastral model," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 59-72.
    8. Bacior, Stanisław, 2023. "Austrian Cadastre still in use – Example proceedings to determine the legal status of land property in southern Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    9. Wójcik-Leń, Justyna & Leń, Przemysław & Mika, Monika & Kryszk, Hubert & Kotlarz, Paweł, 2019. "Studies regarding correct selection of statistical methods for the needs of increasing the efficiency of identification of land for consolidation—A case study in Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    10. Anna Bielska & Agnieszka Wendland & Maciej Delnicki, 2020. "Possibilities for the Development of Building Plots with an Unfavorable Structure in the Context of Spatial Justice: A Case Study of Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-19, March.
    11. Kamil Maciuk & Agnieszka Peska-Siwik & Ahmed El-Mowafy & Lukasz Borowski & Michal Apollo, 2021. "Crustal Deformation Across and beyond Central Europe and Its Impact on Land Boundaries," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-13, February.
    12. Mika, Monika & Leń, Przemysław & Oleniacz, Grzegorz & Kurowska, Krystyna, 2019. "Study of the effects of applying a new algorithm for the comprehensive programming of the hierarchization of land consolidation and exchange works in Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    13. Bielska, Anna & Stańczuk-Gałwiaczek, Małgorzata & Sobolewska-Mikulska, Katarzyna & Mroczkowski, Robert, 2021. "Implementation of the smart village concept based on selected spatial patterns – A case study of Mazowieckie Voivodeship in Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    14. Małgorzata Buśko & Jacek Zyga & Ľubica Hudecová & Peter Kyseľ & Monika Balawejder & Michal Apollo, 2022. "Active Collection of Data in the Real Estate Cadastre in Systems with a Different Pedigree and a Different Way of Building Development: Learning from Poland and Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-17, November.
    15. Asmat Ali & Muhammad Imran, 2021. "National Spatial Data Infrastructure vs Cadastre System for Economic Development: Evidence from Pakistan," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-17, February.
    16. Diogo, V. & Koomen, E. & Kuhlman, T., 2015. "An economic theory-based explanatory model of agricultural land-use patterns: The Netherlands as a case study," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1-16.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Małgorzata Buśko & Jacek Zyga & Ľubica Hudecová & Peter Kyseľ & Monika Balawejder & Michal Apollo, 2022. "Active Collection of Data in the Real Estate Cadastre in Systems with a Different Pedigree and a Different Way of Building Development: Learning from Poland and Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Wojciech Sroka & Jaroslaw Mikolajczyk & Tomasz Wojewodzic & Boguslawa Kwoczynska, 2018. "Agricultural Land vs. Urbanisation in Chosen Polish Metropolitan Areas: A Spatial Analysis Based on Regression Trees," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-22, March.
    3. Przewięźlikowska, Anna, 2020. "Legal aspects of synchronising data on real property location in polish cadastre and land and mortgage register," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    4. Justyna Wójcik-Leń & Przemysław Leń, 2021. "Evaluation of the Symmetry of Statistical Methods Applied for the Identification of Agricultural Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-13, June.
    5. Benedykt Pepliński, 2020. "Location of Cows and Pigs in Suburban Areas of Polish Metropolitan Centers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, March.
    6. Bacior, Stanisław, 2023. "Austrian Cadastre still in use – Example proceedings to determine the legal status of land property in southern Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    7. Malgorzata Busko & Beata Szafranska, 2018. "Analysis of Changes in Land Use Patterns Pursuant to the Conversion of Agricultural Land to Non-Agricultural Use in the Context of the Sustainable Development of the Malopolska Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, January.
    8. Javier García López & Raffaele Sisto & Javier Benayas & Álvaro de Juanes & Julio Lumbreras & Carlos Mataix, 2021. "Assessment of the Results and Methodology of the Sustainable Development Index for Spanish Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-29, June.
    9. Mladen Šoškić & Nenad Višnjevac & Rajica Mihajlović & Dragan Mihajlović & Stevan Marošan, 2022. "The Development of Land Readjustment Models in Serbia and South-East Europe," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-20, June.
    10. Vladimír Raškovič & Zlatica Muchová & František Petrovič, 2019. "A New Approach to the Registration of Buildings towards 3D Land and Property Management in Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-12, August.
    11. Muczyński, Andrzej & Dawidowicz, Agnieszka & Źróbek, Ryszard, 2019. "The information system for social housing management as a part of the land administration system – A case study of Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 165-176.
    12. Wojciech Sroka & Michał Dudek & Tomasz Wojewodzic & Karol Król, 2019. "Generational Changes in Agriculture: The Influence of Farm Characteristics and Socio-Economic Factors," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-27, December.
    13. Solomon Dargie Chekole & Walter Timo de Vries & Gebeyehu Belay Shibeshi, 2020. "An Evaluation Framework for Urban Cadastral System Policy in Ethiopia," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-15, February.
    14. Katarzyna Kocur-Bera & Hubert Frąszczak, 2021. "Coherence of Cadastral Data in Land Management—A Case Study of Rural Areas in Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, April.
    15. Xie, Jinhua & Yang, Gangqiao & Wang, Ge & Song, Yan & Yang, Fan, 2021. "How do different rural-land-consolidation modes shape farmers’ ecological production behaviors?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    16. Svatava Janoušková & Tomáš Hák & Bedřich Moldan, 2018. "Global SDGs Assessments: Helping or Confusing Indicators?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-14, May.
    17. Cegielska, Katarzyna & Noszczyk, Tomasz & Kukulska, Anita & Szylar, Marta & Hernik, Józef & Dixon-Gough, Robert & Jombach, Sándor & Valánszki, István & Filepné Kovács, Krisztina, 2018. "Land use and land cover changes in post-socialist countries: Some observations from Hungary and Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1-18.
    18. Paraskevi Ovezikoglou & Dimitrios Aidonis & Charisios Achillas & Christos Vlachokostas & Dionysis Bochtis, 2020. "Sustainability Assessment of Investments Based on a Multiple Criteria Methodological Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-13, August.
    19. Mika, Monika, 2018. "An analysis of possibilities for the establishment of a multipurpose and multidimensional cadastre in Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 446-453.
    20. Pepliński, Benedykt, 2020. "Changes In The Location Of Cow Herds In Poland In Light Of Sinclair’S Location Theories," Roczniki (Annals), Polish Association of Agricultural Economists and Agribusiness - Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistow Rolnictwa e Agrobiznesu (SERiA), vol. 2020(1).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:12:y:2023:i:6:p:73-:d:1175060. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.