IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v131y2023ics0264837723002065.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Austrian Cadastre still in use – Example proceedings to determine the legal status of land property in southern Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Bacior, Stanisław

Abstract

The cadastral map is a large-scale cartographic record of property ownership that preserves the dimensions and shape of an owned land parcel on the earth surface, but also the spatial relationship of all individual parcels to each other. There are hundreds of thousands of cadastral maps to be found all over the world. Cadastral maps aided land assignment and taxation, presenting statistics essential for territorial administration, or as a symbol of state control over land. The historical land cadastre introduced in the early nineteenth century in the Austrian Empire, was the foundation of many countries' land register systems. One of the areas it covered was Galicia, a southern part of Poland annexed by Austria in the eighteenth century during the Partitions. The study evaluates the use of old Austrian cadastral maps in southern Poland, mainly in matters related to property boundaries. The Austrian Cadastre lost its importance in Poland after the Second World War due to sociopolitical changes. Still, it became a source of data on real property boundaries once again after the 1989 transformation, which restituted and enhanced ownership rights. Today, modern court proceedings on boundary disputes, easement appurtenant decisions, release of property, grant of property title, or usucaption often need to refer to historical legal sources, including the Austrian Cadastre (cadastral maps and land tax registers) to determine ownership boundaries. The paper presents numerous examples of modern uses of historical land cadastre documents, including cadastral maps and land tax registers in land surveying and legal procedures in Poland. The results show that data from the historical land cadastre remain a source of information when determining ownership boundaries despite the time passed. Therefore, the cadastral documentation offers not only historical and research value but also a practical one.

Suggested Citation

  • Bacior, Stanisław, 2023. "Austrian Cadastre still in use – Example proceedings to determine the legal status of land property in southern Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:131:y:2023:i:c:s0264837723002065
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106740
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837723002065
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106740?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Miodrag Roić & Josip Križanović & Doris Pivac, 2021. "An Approach to Resolve Inconsistencies of Data in the Cadastre," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Dawidowicz, Agnieszka & Źróbek, Ryszard, 2018. "A methodological evaluation of the Polish cadastral system based on the global cadastral model," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 59-72.
    3. Lieskovský, Juraj & Kaim, Dominik & Balázs, Pál & Boltižiar, Martin & Chmiel, Mateusz & Grabska, Ewa & Király, Géza & Konkoly-Gyuró, Éva & Kozak, Jacek & Antalová, Katarína & Kuchma, Tetyana & Mackovč, 2018. "Historical land use dataset of the Carpathian region (1819-1980)," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 14(2), pages 644-651.
    4. Golob, Peter & Lisec, Anka, 2022. "Success factors in cadastral boundary settlements based on land surveyor’s opinions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    5. Grant, Donald & Enemark, Stig & Zevenbergen, Jaap & Mitchell, David & McCamley, Geoffrey, 2020. "The Cadastral triangular model," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    6. Janus, Jaroslaw & Markuszewska, Iwona, 2019. "Forty years later: Assessment of the long-lasting effectiveness of land consolidation projects," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 22-31.
    7. Frajer, Jindřich & Fiedor, David, 2021. "A historical curiosity or a source of accurate spatial information on historical land use? The issue of accuracy of old cadastres in the example of Josephian Cadastre from the Habsburg Empire," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    8. Juraj Lieskovský & Dominik Kaim & Pál Balázs & Martin Boltižiar & Mateusz Chmiel & Ewa Grabska & Géza Király & Éva Konkoly-Gyuró & Jacek Kozak & Katarína Antalová & Tetyana Kuchma & Peter Mackovčin & , 2018. "Historical land use dataset of the Carpathian region (1819–1980)," Journal of Maps, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 644-651, November.
    9. Doris Pivac & Miodrag Roić & Josip Križanović & Rinaldo Paar, 2021. "Availability of Historical Cadastral Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, August.
    10. Devátý, Jan & Dostál, Tomáš & Hösl, Rosemarie & Krása, Josef & Strauss, Peter, 2019. "Effects of historical land use and land pattern changes on soil erosion – Case studies from Lower Austria and Central Bohemia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 674-685.
    11. Govedarica, Miro & Radulović, Aleksandra & Sladić, Dubravka, 2021. "Designing and implementing a LADM-based cadastral information system in Serbia, Montenegro and Republic of Srpska," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    12. Femenia-Ribera, Carmen & Mora-Navarro, Gaspar & Pérez, Luis J. Santos, 2022. "Evaluating the use of old cadastral maps," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Malgorzata Busko & Michal Apollo, 2023. "Public Administration and Landowners Facing Real Estate Cadastre Modernization: A Win-Lose or Win-Win Situation?," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mladen Šoškić & Nenad Višnjevac & Rajica Mihajlović & Dragan Mihajlović & Stevan Marošan, 2022. "The Development of Land Readjustment Models in Serbia and South-East Europe," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-20, June.
    2. Yang, Xuhong & Jin, Xiaobin & Xue, Qiaofeng & Zhou, Yinkang, 2022. "Reconstruction of the spatial distribution of historical farmland in the Taiwan Province of China for 1659–1945," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    3. Malgorzata Busko & Michal Apollo, 2023. "Public Administration and Landowners Facing Real Estate Cadastre Modernization: A Win-Lose or Win-Win Situation?," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, June.
    4. Jana Moravcova & Vendula Moravcova & Tomas Pavlicek & Nikola Novakova, 2022. "Land Use Has Changed through the Last 200 Years in Various Production Areas of South Bohemia," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, September.
    5. Yildiz, Umit & Gürel, Murat & Kocaman, Sultan, 2022. "State liability and uncertainty perception on cadastral parcel area registry in Turkey," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    6. Michaela Žoncová & Pavel Hronček & Bohuslava Gregorová, 2020. "Mapping of the Land Cover Changes in High Mountains of Western Carpathians between 1990–2018: Case Study of the Low Tatras National Park (Slovakia)," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-20, December.
    7. Fei Chen & Xiaoyong Bai & Fang Liu & Guangjie Luo & Yichao Tian & Luoyi Qin & Yue Li & Yan Xu & Jinfeng Wang & Luhua Wu & Chaojun Li & Sirui Zhang & Chen Ran, 2022. "Analysis Long-Term and Spatial Changes of Forest Cover in Typical Karst Areas of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, August.
    8. Pavel Hronček & Bohuslava Gregorová & Dana Tometzová & Mário Molokáč & Ladislav Hvizdák, 2020. "Modeling of Vanished Historic Mining Landscape Features as a Part of Digital Cultural Heritage and Possibilities of Its Use in Mining Tourism (Case Study: Gelnica Town, Slovakia)," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-16, April.
    9. Bujar Fetai & Jernej Tekavec & Mojca Kosmatin Fras & Anka Lisec, 2022. "Inconsistencies in Cadastral Boundary Data—Digitisation and Maintenance," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, December.
    10. Juraj Lieskovský & Dana Lieskovská, 2021. "Cropland Abandonment in Slovakia: Analysis and Comparison of Different Data Sources," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, March.
    11. Jana Vojteková & Matej Vojtek & Anna Tirpáková & Ivona Vlkolinská, 2019. "Spatial Analysis of Pottery Presence at the Former Pobedim Hillfort (an Archeological Site in Slovakia)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-17, December.
    12. Jana Podhrazska & Jan Szturc & Petr Karasek & Josef Kucera & Jana Konecna, 2019. "Economic impacts of farmland degradation in the Czech Republic - Case study," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 65(11), pages 529-538.
    13. Lili Zhang & Baoqing Hu & Ze Zhang & Gaodou Liang & Simin Huang, 2023. "Comprehensive Evaluation of Ecological-Economic Value of Guangxi Based on Land Consolidation," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-25, March.
    14. Katarzyna Kocur-Bera & Hubert Frąszczak, 2021. "Coherence of Cadastral Data in Land Management—A Case Study of Rural Areas in Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, April.
    15. Justyna Wójcik-Leń & Przemysław Leń, 2021. "Evaluation of the Symmetry of Statistical Methods Applied for the Identification of Agricultural Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-13, June.
    16. Trnka, Miroslav & Vizina, Adam & Hanel, Martin & Balek, Jan & Fischer, Milan & Hlavinka, Petr & Semerádová, Daniela & Štěpánek, Petr & Zahradníček, Pavel & Skalák, Petr & Eitzinger, Josef & Dubrovský,, 2022. "Increasing available water capacity as a factor for increasing drought resilience or potential conflict over water resources under present and future climate conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    17. Jiyun Li & Yong Zhou & Qing Li & Siqi Yi & Lina Peng, 2022. "Exploring the Effects of Land Use Changes on the Landscape Pattern and Soil Erosion of Western Hubei Province from 2000 to 2020," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-27, January.
    18. Weilun Feng & Yurui Li, 2021. "Measuring the Ecological Safety Effects of Land Use Transitions Promoted by Land Consolidation Projects: The Case of Yan’an City on the Loess Plateau of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-15, July.
    19. Aditya, Trias & Santosa, Purnama Budi & Yulaikhah, Yulaikhah & Widjajanti, Nurrohmat & Atunggal, Dedi & Sulistyawati, Miranty, 2021. "Title Validation and collaborative mapping to accelerate quality assurance of land registration," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    20. Abdurahman Yasin Yiğit & Seda Nur Gamze Hamal & Murat Yakar & Ali Ulvi, 2023. "Investigation and Implementation of New Technology Wearable Mobile Laser Scanning (WMLS) in Transition to an Intelligent Geospatial Cadastral Information System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:131:y:2023:i:c:s0264837723002065. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.