IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmerit/v3y2023i2p21-389d1150759.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Challenges Women Experience in Leadership Careers: An Integrative Review

Author

Listed:
  • Enkhzul Galsanjigmed

    (Graduate School of Management, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan)

  • Tomoki Sekiguchi

    (Graduate School of Management, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan)

Abstract

A part of diversity management is working to achieve gender equality and create a comfortable working environment for women. However, in many organizations, gender biases and stereotypes frequently occur, consciously or unconsciously, regardless of whether women take on leadership roles. In addition, women must overcome a variety of challenges when taking on leadership roles or aspiring to become leaders. Based on the above background, we review and integrate the literature on management and career studies related to the challenges that women face in the process of advancing to leadership positions in organizations. Specifically, we examine the external and internal factors that create the various obstacles that women who aspire to leadership positions in structured organizations face from a gender perspective. Based on the integrative review, we discuss the implications for practices to increase the number of female leaders.

Suggested Citation

  • Enkhzul Galsanjigmed & Tomoki Sekiguchi, 2023. "Challenges Women Experience in Leadership Careers: An Integrative Review," Merits, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-24, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmerit:v:3:y:2023:i:2:p:21-389:d:1150759
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-8104/3/2/21/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-8104/3/2/21/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matthew Lee & Laura Huang, 2018. "Gender Bias, Social Impact Framing, and Evaluation of Entrepreneurial Ventures," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(1), pages 1-16, February.
    2. Kevin Stainback & Soyoung Kwon, 2012. "Female Leaders, Organizational Power, and Sex Segregation," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 639(1), pages 217-235, January.
    3. Karelaia, Natalia & Guillén, Laura, 2014. "Me, a woman and a leader: Positive social identity and identity conflict," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 125(2), pages 204-219.
    4. Yoshikawa, Katsuhiko & Kokubo, Akiko & Wu, Chia-Huei, 2018. "A Cultural Perspective on Gender Inequity in STEM: The Japanese Context," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(2), pages 301-309, June.
    5. Heilman, Madeline E. & Eagly, Alice H., 2008. "Gender Stereotypes Are Alive, Well, and Busy Producing Workplace Discrimination," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(4), pages 393-398, December.
    6. Sajeet Pradhan & Lalatendu Kesari Jena, 2019. "Does Meaningful Work Explains the Relationship Between Transformational Leadership and Innovative Work Behaviour?," Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, , vol. 44(1), pages 30-40, March.
    7. Stichman, Amy J. & Hassell, Kimberly D. & Archbold, Carol A., 2010. "Strength in numbers? A test of Kanter's theory of tokenism," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 633-639, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pipiet Larasatie & Chorirotun Nur Ulifah, 2023. "Mother Leads with Her Heart: A Case Study of Women Worker Leaders in the Men-Dominated Forestry Sector," Merits, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-13, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bryan K. Stroube & David M. Waguespack, 2024. "Status and consensus: Heterogeneity in audience evaluations of female‐ versus male‐lead films," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(5), pages 994-1024, May.
    2. Górska Anna, 2017. "Perception of Women in Top Managerial Positions in Poland," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 25(1), pages 16-32, March.
    3. Enrica N. Ruggs & Jennifer Ames Stuart & Linyun W. Yang, 2018. "The effect of traditionally marginalized groups in advertising on consumer response," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 319-335, September.
    4. Burbano, Vanessa & Padilla, Nicolas & Meier, Stephan, 2020. "Gender Differences in Preferences for Meaning at Work," IZA Discussion Papers 13053, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    5. Berry, James W. & Sanchez, Janice, 2019. "Perceiving entrepreneurs: Job title comparisons in warmth and competence," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 12(C).
    6. Howell, Travis, 2022. "Coworking spaces: An overview and research agenda," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(2).
    7. Jiang, Yiqi & Jiang, Zhou & Chen, Zhijun, 2024. "Women entrepreneurship in China: A bibliometric literature review and future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    8. Forrester, Juanita Kimiyo & Neville, François, 2021. "An institutional perspective on borrowing discouragement among female-owned enterprises and the role of regional female empowerment," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(6).
    9. Lawson, Cornelia & Salter, Ammon, 2023. "Exploring the effect of overlapping institutional applications on panel decision-making," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(9).
    10. McSweeney, Jordan J. & McSweeney, Kevin T. & Webb, Justin W. & Devers, Cynthia E., 2022. "The right touch of pitch assertiveness: Examining entrepreneurs' gender and project category fit in crowdfunding," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 37(4).
    11. Gökhan Akıncı & Lutfihak Alpkan & Bora Yıldız & Gaye Karacay, 2022. "The Link between Ambidextrous Leadership and Innovative Work Behavior in a Military Organization: The Moderating Role of Climate for Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-19, November.
    12. Arceo-Gomez, Eva O. & Campos-Vazquez, Raymundo M., 2022. "Gender Bias in Evaluation Processes," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    13. Guillaume Dumont, 2024. "Evaluating the Credibility of Entrepreneurs’ Impact Promises in Early-Stage Impact Investing," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 48(6), pages 1525-1555, November.
    14. Adina D. Sterling & Roberto M. Fernandez, 2018. "Once in the Door: Gender, Tryouts, and the Initial Salaries of Managers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(11), pages 5444-5460, November.
    15. Brad Greenwood & Idris Adjerid & Corey M. Angst & Nathan L. Meikle, 2022. "How Unbecoming of You: Online Experiments Uncovering Gender Biases in Perceptions of Ridesharing Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(3), pages 499-518, January.
    16. Michael Odei Erdiaw‐Kwasie & Matthew Abunyewah, 2024. "Determinants of social innovation in hybrid organisations: The moderating role of technology readiness," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 1099-1112, February.
    17. Wenping Ye & Zhongfeng Su & Hongjia Ma, 2023. "Does climate risk affect entrepreneurial growth aspirations? The moderating effects of gender and solo-founded ventures," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 61(4), pages 1671-1692, December.
    18. Lin Xiu & Morley Gunderson, 2021. "Does an Entrepreneurial Career Pay for Women in China?," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 59(1), pages 167-190, March.
    19. Rita Goyal & Nada Kakabadse & Andrew Kakabadse & Danielle Talbot, 2023. "Female board directors' resilience against gender discrimination," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 197-222, January.
    20. Letian Zhang, 2020. "An Institutional Approach to Gender Diversity and Firm Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 439-457, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmerit:v:3:y:2023:i:2:p:21-389:d:1150759. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.