IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v9y2021i18p2236-d633732.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Joint Scheduling of Yard Crane, Yard Truck, and Quay Crane for Container Terminal Considering Vessel Stowage Plan: An Integrated Simulation-Based Optimization Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Hsien-Pin Hsu

    (Department of Supply Chain Management, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung 81157, Taiwan)

  • Chia-Nan Wang

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung 80778, Taiwan)

  • Hsin-Pin Fu

    (Department of Marketing and Distribution Management, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung 824, Taiwan)

  • Thanh-Tuan Dang

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung 80778, Taiwan
    Department of Logistics and Supply Chain Management, Hong Bang International University, Ho Chi Minh 723000, Vietnam)

Abstract

The joint scheduling of quay cranes (QCs), yard cranes (YCs), and yard trucks (YTs) is critical to achieving good overall performance for a container terminal. However, there are only a few such integrated studies. Especially, those who have taken the vessel stowage plan (VSP) into consideration are very rare. The VSP is a plan assigning each container a stowage position in a vessel. It affects the QC operations directly and considerably. Neglecting this plan will cause problems when loading/unloading containers into/from a ship or even congest the YT and YC operations in the upstream. In this research, a framework of simulation-based optimization methods have been proposed firstly. Then, four kinds of heuristics/metaheuristics has been employed in this framework, such as sort-by-bay (SBB), genetic algorithm (GA), particle swarm optimization (PSO), and multiple groups particle swarm optimization (MGPSO), to deal with the yard crane scheduling problem (YCSP), yard truck scheduling problem (YTSP), and quay crane scheduling problem (QCSP) simultaneously for export containers, taking operational constraints into consideration. The objective aims to minimize makespan. Each of the simulation-based optimization methods includes three components, load-balancing heuristic, sequencing method, and simulation model. Experiments have been conducted to investigate the effectiveness of different simulation-based optimization methods. The results show that the MGPSO outperforms the others.

Suggested Citation

  • Hsien-Pin Hsu & Chia-Nan Wang & Hsin-Pin Fu & Thanh-Tuan Dang, 2021. "Joint Scheduling of Yard Crane, Yard Truck, and Quay Crane for Container Terminal Considering Vessel Stowage Plan: An Integrated Simulation-Based Optimization Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(18), pages 1-28, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:18:p:2236-:d:633732
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/18/2236/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/18/2236/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ebru K. Bish & Frank Y. Chen & Yin Thin Leong & Barry L. Nelson & Jonathan Wing Cheong Ng & David Simchi-Levi, 2007. "Dispatching vehicles in a mega container terminal," Springer Books, in: Kap Hwan Kim & Hans-Otto Günther (ed.), Container Terminals and Cargo Systems, pages 179-194, Springer.
    2. Carlo, Héctor J. & Vis, Iris F.A. & Roodbergen, Kees Jan, 2014. "Storage yard operations in container terminals: Literature overview, trends, and research directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 412-430.
    3. Bierwirth, Christian & Meisel, Frank, 2010. "A survey of berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems in container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 615-627, May.
    4. Omor Sharif & Nathan Huynh, 2012. "Yard crane scheduling at container terminals: A comparative study of centralized and decentralized approaches," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 14(2), pages 139-161, June.
    5. Imai, Akio & Chen, Hsieh Chia & Nishimura, Etsuko & Papadimitriou, Stratos, 2008. "The simultaneous berth and quay crane allocation problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(5), pages 900-920, September.
    6. Carlo, Héctor J. & Vis, Iris F.A. & Roodbergen, Kees Jan, 2014. "Transport operations in container terminals: Literature overview, trends, research directions and classification scheme," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(1), pages 1-13.
    7. Wu, Yue & Luo, Jiabin & Zhang, Dali & Dong, Ming, 2013. "An integrated programming model for storage management and vehicle scheduling at container terminals," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 13-27.
    8. Ng, W. C., 2005. "Crane scheduling in container yards with inter-crane interference," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 164(1), pages 64-78, July.
    9. Chen, Lu & Bostel, Nathalie & Dejax, Pierre & Cai, Jianguo & Xi, Lifeng, 2007. "A tabu search algorithm for the integrated scheduling problem of container handling systems in a maritime terminal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(1), pages 40-58, August.
    10. Kap Hwan Kim & Jong Wook Bae, 2004. "A Look-Ahead Dispatching Method for Automated Guided Vehicles in Automated Port Container Terminals," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(2), pages 224-234, May.
    11. Chen, Lu & Langevin, André & Lu, Zhiqiang, 2013. "Integrated scheduling of crane handling and truck transportation in a maritime container terminal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(1), pages 142-152.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Buddhi A. Weerasinghe & H. Niles Perera & Xiwen Bai, 2024. "Optimizing container terminal operations: a systematic review of operations research applications," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 26(2), pages 307-341, June.
    2. van Twiller, Jaike & Sivertsen, Agnieszka & Pacino, Dario & Jensen, Rune Møller, 2024. "Literature survey on the container stowage planning problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 317(3), pages 841-857.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gharehgozli, A.H. & Roy, D. & de Koster, M.B.M., 2014. "Sea Container Terminals," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2014-009-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    2. Damla Kizilay & Deniz Türsel Eliiyi, 2021. "A comprehensive review of quay crane scheduling, yard operations and integrations thereof in container terminals," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 1-42, March.
    3. Shell Ying Huang & Ya Li, 2017. "Yard crane scheduling to minimize total weighted vessel loading time in container terminals," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 689-720, December.
    4. Qin, Tianbao & Du, Yuquan & Chen, Jiang Hang & Sha, Mei, 2020. "Combining mixed integer programming and constraint programming to solve the integrated scheduling problem of container handling operations of a single vessel," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 884-901.
    5. Boysen, Nils & Briskorn, Dirk & Meisel, Frank, 2017. "A generalized classification scheme for crane scheduling with interference," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(1), pages 343-357.
    6. Gharehgozli, Amir & Zaerpour, Nima, 2018. "Stacking outbound barge containers in an automated deep-sea terminal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 977-995.
    7. Chen, Lu & Langevin, André & Lu, Zhiqiang, 2013. "Integrated scheduling of crane handling and truck transportation in a maritime container terminal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(1), pages 142-152.
    8. Gharehgozli, Amir & Yu, Yugang & de Koster, René & Du, Shaofu, 2019. "Sequencing storage and retrieval requests in a container block with multiple open locations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 261-284.
    9. Gharehgozli, Amir Hossein & Vernooij, Floris Gerardus & Zaerpour, Nima, 2017. "A simulation study of the performance of twin automated stacking cranes at a seaport container terminal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(1), pages 108-128.
    10. Yan Zheng & Meixian Xu & Zhaohu Wang & Yujie Xiao, 2023. "A Genetic Algorithm for Integrated Scheduling of Container Handing Systems at Container Terminals from a Low-Carbon Operations Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-21, March.
    11. Zhou, Chenhao & Lee, Byung Kwon & Li, Haobin, 2020. "Integrated optimization on yard crane scheduling and vehicle positioning at container yards," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    12. T. Jonker & M. B. Duinkerken & N. Yorke-Smith & A. Waal & R. R. Negenborn, 2021. "Coordinated optimization of equipment operations in a container terminal," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 281-311, June.
    13. Schepler, Xavier & Balev, Stefan & Michel, Sophie & Sanlaville, Éric, 2017. "Global planning in a multi-terminal and multi-modal maritime container port," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 38-62.
    14. Kress, Dominik & Meiswinkel, Sebastian & Pesch, Erwin, 2019. "Straddle carrier routing at seaport container terminals in the presence of short term quay crane buffer areas," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(3), pages 732-750.
    15. Lashkari, Shabnam & Wu, Yong & Petering, Matthew E.H., 2017. "Sequencing dual-spreader crane operations: Mathematical formulation and heuristic algorithm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(2), pages 521-534.
    16. Hang Yu & Yiyun Deng & Leijie Zhang & Xin Xiao & Caimao Tan, 2022. "Yard Operations and Management in Automated Container Terminals: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-24, March.
    17. Ulf Speer & Kathrin Fischer, 2017. "Scheduling of Different Automated Yard Crane Systems at Container Terminals," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(1), pages 305-324, February.
    18. Dirk Briskorn & Lennart Zey, 2018. "Resolving interferences of triple‐crossover‐cranes by determining paths in networks," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 65(6-7), pages 477-498, September.
    19. Robenek, Tomáš & Umang, Nitish & Bierlaire, Michel & Ropke, Stefan, 2014. "A branch-and-price algorithm to solve the integrated berth allocation and yard assignment problem in bulk ports," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 399-411.
    20. Kastner, Marvin & Kämmerling, Nicolas & Jahn, Carlos & Clausen, Uwe, 2020. "Equipment selection and layout planning - Literature overview and research directions," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Jahn, Carlos & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Data Science in Maritime and City Logistics: Data-driven Solutions for Logistics and Sustainability. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conferen, volume 30, pages 485-519, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:18:p:2236-:d:633732. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.