IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v8y2020i9p1548-d411370.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using the Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Inference Systems to Compare the Impact of Speed and Space Perception on the Occurrence of Road Traffic Accidents

Author

Listed:
  • Marjana Čubranić-Dobrodolac

    (Faculty of Transport Engineering, University of Pardubice, Studentská 95, 532 10 Pardubice, Czech Republic
    Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, University of Belgrade, Vojvode Stepe 305, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Libor Švadlenka

    (Faculty of Transport Engineering, University of Pardubice, Studentská 95, 532 10 Pardubice, Czech Republic)

  • Svetlana Čičević

    (Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, University of Belgrade, Vojvode Stepe 305, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Aleksandar Trifunović

    (Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, University of Belgrade, Vojvode Stepe 305, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Momčilo Dobrodolac

    (Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, University of Belgrade, Vojvode Stepe 305, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

Abstract

A constantly increasing number of deaths on roads forces analysts to search for models that predict the driver’s propensity for road traffic accidents (RTAs). This paper aims to examine a relationship between the speed and space assessment capabilities of drivers in terms of their association with the occurrence of RTAs. The method used for this purpose is based on the implementation of the interval Type-2 Fuzzy Inference System (T2FIS). The inputs to the first T2FIS relate to the speed assessment capabilities of drivers. These capabilities were measured in the experiment with 178 young drivers, with test speeds of 30, 50, and 70 km/h. The participants assessed the aforementioned speed values from four different observation positions in the driving simulator. On the other hand, the inputs of the second T2FIS are space assessment capabilities. The same group of drivers took two types of space assessment tests—2D and 3D. The third considered T2FIS sublimates of all previously mentioned inputs in one model. The output in all three T2FIS structures is the number of RTAs experienced by a driver. By testing three proposed T2FISs on the empirical data, the result of the research indicates that the space assessment characteristics better explain participation in RTAs compared to the speed assessment capabilities. The results obtained are further confirmed by implementing a multiple regression analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Marjana Čubranić-Dobrodolac & Libor Švadlenka & Svetlana Čičević & Aleksandar Trifunović & Momčilo Dobrodolac, 2020. "Using the Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Inference Systems to Compare the Impact of Speed and Space Perception on the Occurrence of Road Traffic Accidents," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-19, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:9:p:1548-:d:411370
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/9/1548/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/9/1548/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pingping Gao & Yabin Gao, 2019. "Quadrilateral Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Regression Analysis for Data Outlier Detection," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-9, August.
    2. Chen, Tzu-Ying & Jou, Rong-Chang, 2019. "Using HLM to investigate the relationship between traffic accident risk of private vehicles and public transportation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 148-161.
    3. Shafaei Bajestani, Narges & Vahidian Kamyad, Ali & Nasli Esfahani, Ensieh & Zare, Assef, 2018. "Prediction of retinopathy in diabetic patients using type-2 fuzzy regression model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(3), pages 859-869.
    4. Ryder, Benjamin & Dahlinger, Andre & Gahr, Bernhard & Zundritsch, Peter & Wortmann, Felix & Fleisch, Elgar, 2019. "Spatial prediction of traffic accidents with critical driving events – Insights from a nationwide field study," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 611-626.
    5. Wang, Chao & Quddus, Mohammed & Ison, Stephen, 2009. "The effects of area-wide road speed and curvature on traffic casualties in England," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 385-395.
    6. Stefan Jovčić & Petr Průša & Momčilo Dobrodolac & Libor Švadlenka, 2019. "A Proposal for a Decision-Making Tool in Third-Party Logistics (3PL) Provider Selection Based on Multi-Criteria Analysis and the Fuzzy Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-23, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ke Zhang & Yaming Guo, 2023. "Attention-Based Residual Dilated Network for Traffic Accident Prediction," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Marjana Čubranić-Dobrodolac & Stefan Jovčić & Sara Bošković & Darko Babić, 2023. "A Decision-Making Model for Professional Drivers Selection: A Hybridized Fuzzy–AROMAN–Fuller Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-24, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gu, Shuang & Li, Keping & Feng, Tao & Yan, Dongyang & Liu, Yanyan, 2022. "The prediction of potential risk path in railway traffic events," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    2. Weifan Zhong & Lijing Du, 2023. "Predicting Traffic Casualties Using Support Vector Machines with Heuristic Algorithms: A Study Based on Collision Data of Urban Roads," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Yu, Chenyang & Tan, Yuanfang & Zhou, Yu & Zang, Chuanxiang & Tu, Chenglin, 2022. "Can functional urban specialization improve industrial energy efficiency? Empirical evidence from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PA).
    4. Lord, Dominique & Mannering, Fred, 2010. "The statistical analysis of crash-frequency data: A review and assessment of methodological alternatives," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 44(5), pages 291-305, June.
    5. Claudio Caterino & Luigi M. Solivetti, 2022. "Spatial distribution of serious traffic accidents and its persistence over time in Milan," RIEDS - Rivista Italiana di Economia, Demografia e Statistica - The Italian Journal of Economic, Demographic and Statistical Studies, SIEDS Societa' Italiana di Economia Demografia e Statistica, vol. 76(1), pages 23-33, January-M.
    6. Stefan Jovčić & Petr Průša, 2021. "A Hybrid MCDM Approach in Third-Party Logistics (3PL) Provider Selection," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(21), pages 1-19, October.
    7. Mike G. Tsionas, 2023. "Linex and double-linex regression for parameter estimation and forecasting," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 323(1), pages 229-245, April.
    8. Jing Wang & Chenhao Zhao & Zhixia Liu, 2024. "Can Historical Accident Data Improve Sustainable Urban Traffic Safety? A Predictive Modeling Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-24, November.
    9. Federico Orsini & Mariaelena Tagliabue & Giulia De Cet & Massimiliano Gastaldi & Riccardo Rossi, 2021. "Highway Deceleration Lane Safety: Effects of Real-Time Coaching Programs on Driving Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-16, August.
    10. Sanja Puzović & Jasmina Vesić Vasović & Dragan D. Milanović & Vladan Paunović, 2023. "A Hybrid Fuzzy MCDM Approach to Open Innovation Partner Evaluation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-26, July.
    11. Tibor Sipos & Anteneh Afework Mekonnen & Zsombor Szabó, 2021. "Spatial Econometric Analysis of Road Traffic Crashes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, February.
    12. Dražen Žgaljić & Edvard Tijan & Alen Jugović & Tanja Poletan Jugović, 2019. "Implementation of Sustainable Motorways of the Sea Services Multi-Criteria Analysis of a Croatian Port System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-21, December.
    13. Kexin Bi & Mengke Yang & Latif Zahid & Xiaoguang Zhou, 2020. "A New Solution for City Distribution to Achieve Environmental Benefits within the Trend of Green Logistics: A Case Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-25, October.
    14. Mireille Megnidio-Tchoukouegno & Jacob Adedayo Adedeji, 2023. "Machine Learning for Road Traffic Accident Improvement and Environmental Resource Management in the Transportation Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, January.
    15. Obelheiro, Marta Rodrigues & da Silva, Alan Ricardo & Nodari, Christine Tessele & Cybis, Helena Beatriz Bettella & Lindau, Luis Antonio, 2020. "A new zone system to analyze the spatial relationships between the built environment and traffic safety," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    16. Xu, Chengcheng & Wang, Yong & Liu, Pan & Wang, Wei & Bao, Jie, 2018. "Quantitative risk assessment of freeway crash casualty using high-resolution traffic data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 299-311.
    17. Huang, Wencheng & Zhang, Yue & Yin, Dezhi & Zuo, Borui & Liu, Zhanru, 2021. "Urban bus accident analysis: based on a Tropos Goal Risk-Accident Framework considering Learning From Incidents process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    18. Sai Chand & Zhuolin Li & Abdulmajeed Alsultan & Vinayak V. Dixit, 2022. "Comparing and Contrasting the Impacts of Macro-Level Factors on Crash Duration and Frequency," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-19, May.
    19. Wang, Chunli & Jiang, Qun'ou & Engel, Bernard & Mercado, Johann Alexander Vera & Zhang, Zhonghui, 2020. "Analysis on net primary productivity change of forests and its multi–level driving mechanism – A case study in Changbai Mountains in Northeast China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    20. Adil Baykasoğlu & İlker Gölcük, 2019. "An Interactive Data-Driven (Dynamic) Multiple Attribute Decision Making Model via Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Functions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-31, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:9:p:1548-:d:411370. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.