IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i14p3168-d1197431.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Hybrid Fuzzy MCDM Approach to Open Innovation Partner Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Sanja Puzović

    (Faculty of Technical Sciences Čačak, University of Kragujevac, 32000 Čačak, Serbia)

  • Jasmina Vesić Vasović

    (Faculty of Technical Sciences Čačak, University of Kragujevac, 32000 Čačak, Serbia)

  • Dragan D. Milanović

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Vladan Paunović

    (Faculty of Technical Sciences Čačak, University of Kragujevac, 32000 Čačak, Serbia)

Abstract

Even though interest in open innovation (OI) both as a research field and as an industrial practice for creating competitively advantageous innovation through collaboration has grown exponentially over the last decades, the issue of how to transform OI strategy into a sustainable competitive advantage is still an open research question. Selecting partners capable of operationally and strategically contributing to the OI project goals is a strategic decision for companies striving to effectively implement the OI concept. The study is aimed at defining a structured and methodology-supported decision-making process for OI partner selection based on a novel hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) model which is enhanced by interval type-2 fuzzy sets (IT2F) to deal with the inherent uncertainty. The model combines IT2F Delphi (IT2FD), IT2F Analytical Hierarchy Process (IT2F AHP), and IT2F Preference Ranking Organization METHod for Enrichment of Evaluations (IT2F PROMETHEE). The study provides a comprehensive framework of the OI partner performance indicators; additionally, it provides a contingent approach to identifying evaluation criteria depending on the nature of the company’s innovation processes, contextual conditions, and innovation strategy. The case study is used to verify the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed process. The study’s results highlight the significance of specific factors related to the partners’ technological competencies.

Suggested Citation

  • Sanja Puzović & Jasmina Vesić Vasović & Dragan D. Milanović & Vladan Paunović, 2023. "A Hybrid Fuzzy MCDM Approach to Open Innovation Partner Evaluation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-26, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:14:p:3168-:d:1197431
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/14/3168/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/14/3168/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Reshma H. Shah & Vanitha Swaminathan, 2008. "Factors influencing partner selection in strategic alliances: the moderating role of alliance context," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5), pages 471-494, May.
    2. Fatih Ecer, 2022. "Multi-criteria decision making for green supplier selection using interval type-2 fuzzy AHP: a case study of a home appliance manufacturer," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 199-233, March.
    3. Seyed Amirali Hoseini & Sarfaraz Hashemkhani Zolfani & Paulius Skačkauskas & Alireza Fallahpour & Sara Saberi, 2021. "A Combined Interval Type-2 Fuzzy MCDM Framework for the Resilient Supplier Selection Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-24, December.
    4. Aleksandar Aleksić & Snežana Nestić & Michael Huber & Nikolina Ljepava, 2022. "The Assessment of the Key Competences for Lifelong Learning—The Fuzzy Model Approach for Sustainable Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-15, February.
    5. Du, Jingshu & Leten, Bart & Vanhaverbeke, Wim, 2014. "Managing open innovation projects with science-based and market-based partners," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(5), pages 828-840.
    6. Carmona-Lavado, Antonio & Cuevas-Rodríguez, Gloria & Cabello-Medina, Carmen & Fedriani, Eugenio M., 2021. "Does open innovation always work? The role of complementary assets," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    7. Becker, Wolfgang & Dietz, Jurgen, 2004. "R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms--evidence for the German manufacturing industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 209-223, March.
    8. Xu, Zeshui & Da, Qingli, 2005. "A least deviation method to obtain a priority vector of a fuzzy preference relation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 164(1), pages 206-216, July.
    9. Ricardo S. Santos & Jose Soares & Pedro Carmona Marques & Helena V. G. Navas & José Moleiro Martins, 2021. "Integrating Business, Social, and Environmental Goals in Open Innovation through Partner Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-25, November.
    10. Liang, Gin-Shuh, 1999. "Fuzzy MCDM based on ideal and anti-ideal concepts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(3), pages 682-691, February.
    11. Dacin, M. Tina & Hitt, Michael A. & Levitas, Edward, 1997. "Selecting partners for successful international alliances: Examination of U.S. and Korean firms," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 3-16, April.
    12. Sandra Dubouloz & Rachel Bocquet & Catherine Equey Balzli & Elodie Gardet & Romain Gandia, 2021. "SMEs’ Open Innovation: Applying a Barrier Approach," Post-Print hal-03944937, HAL.
    13. Gangfeng Wang & Xitian Tian & Yongbiao Hu & Richard David Evans & Mingrui Tian & Rong Wang, 2017. "Manufacturing Process Innovation-Oriented Knowledge Evaluation Using MCDM and Fuzzy Linguistic Computing in an Open Innovation Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-19, September.
    14. Büyüközkan, Gülçin & Feyzioglu, Orhan & Nebol, Erdal, 2008. "Selection of the strategic alliance partner in logistics value chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 148-158, May.
    15. L Mikhailov, 2000. "A fuzzy programming method for deriving priorities in the analytic hierarchy process," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 51(3), pages 341-349, March.
    16. Wang, Ming-Yeu, 2012. "Exploring potential R&D collaborators with complementary technologies: The case of biosensors," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 79(5), pages 862-874.
    17. Chang, Da-Yong, 1996. "Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 649-655, December.
    18. Stefan Jovčić & Petr Průša & Momčilo Dobrodolac & Libor Švadlenka, 2019. "A Proposal for a Decision-Making Tool in Third-Party Logistics (3PL) Provider Selection Based on Multi-Criteria Analysis and the Fuzzy Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-23, August.
    19. J Michael Geringer, 1991. "Strategic Determinants of Partner Selection Criteria in International Joint Ventures," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 22(1), pages 41-62, March.
    20. Çolak, Murat & Kaya, İhsan, 2017. "Prioritization of renewable energy alternatives by using an integrated fuzzy MCDM model: A real case application for Turkey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 840-853.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gabriel Gomes Moreira & Robério José Rogério dos Santos & Victor Diogho Heuer de Carvalho & Francisco José Peixoto Rosário & Agnaldo José dos Santos, 2024. "Potential for Frugal Innovation in a Brazilian Regional System: A Study Based on a Multicriteria Approach," Societies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-22, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Song, Bomi & Seol, Hyeonju & Park, Yongtae, 2016. "A patent portfolio-based approach for assessing potential R&D partners: An application of the Shapley value," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 156-165.
    2. Sascha Kraus & Fabian Meier & Thomas Niemand & Ricarda B. Bouncken & Paavo Ritala, 2018. "In search for the ideal coopetition partner: an experimental study," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 1025-1053, October.
    3. Marisol Carvajal-Camperos & Paloma Almodóvar & Ignacio Danvila-del-Valle, 2024. "Examining the conditions for signing a strategic alliance contract: a configurational approach to the biotechnology sector," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 44-68, February.
    4. Krammer, Sorin M.S., 2018. "A double-edged sword? The antipodal effects of institutional distance on partner selection in cross-border alliances," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(6), pages 930-943.
    5. Julia K. Groote & Sabrina Schell & Nadine Kammerlander & Andreas Hack, 2023. "The role of similarity and complementarity in the selection of potential partners for open innovation projects in family firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 60(4), pages 1347-1367, April.
    6. Chia-Nan Wang & Ngoc-Ai-Thy Nguyen & Thanh-Tuan Dang & Chen-Ming Lu, 2021. "A Compromised Decision-Making Approach to Third-Party Logistics Selection in Sustainable Supply Chain Using Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy VIKOR Methods," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-27, April.
    7. Lupo, Toni, 2015. "Fuzzy ServPerf model combined with ELECTRE III to comparatively evaluate service quality of international airports in Sicily," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 249-259.
    8. Wang, Xiaojun & Chan, Hing Kai & Li, Dong, 2015. "A case study of an integrated fuzzy methodology for green product development," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(1), pages 212-223.
    9. Chung, Jaemin & Ko, Namuk & Yoon, Janghyeok, 2021. "Inventor group identification approach for selecting university-industry collaboration partners," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    10. Aleksandar Aleksić & Danijela Tadić, 2023. "Industrial and Management Applications of Type-2 Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Techniques Extended with Type-2 Fuzzy Sets from 2013 to 2022," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, May.
    11. Griffith, David A., 2011. "Insights into gaining access to export financing: Understanding export lenders' ideal exporter profile," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 84-92, January.
    12. Olcer, A. I. & Odabasi, A. Y., 2005. "A new fuzzy multiple attributive group decision making methodology and its application to propulsion/manoeuvring system selection problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 166(1), pages 93-114, October.
    13. Alev Taskin Gumus & A. Yesim Yayla & Erkan Çelik & Aytac Yildiz, 2013. "A Combined Fuzzy-AHP and Fuzzy-GRA Methodology for Hydrogen Energy Storage Method Selection in Turkey," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(6), pages 1-16, June.
    14. S. Mostafa Mokhtari & Hamid Alinejad-Rokny & Hossein Jalalifar, 2014. "Selection of the best well control system by using fuzzy multiple-attribute decision-making methods," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(5), pages 1105-1121, May.
    15. Wu, Yunna & Xu, Chuanbo & Zhang, Ting, 2018. "Evaluation of renewable power sources using a fuzzy MCDM based on cumulative prospect theory: A case in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 1227-1239.
    16. Zhu, Bin & Xu, Zeshui & Zhang, Ren & Hong, Mei, 2015. "Generalized analytic network process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(1), pages 277-288.
    17. Wang, Pien & Hou Wee, Chow & Hiong Koh, Peck, 1999. "Establishing a successful Sino-foreign equity joint venture: the Singapore experience," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 287-305, October.
    18. Marco Furlotti & Giuseppe Soda, 2018. "Fit for the Task: Complementarity, Asymmetry, and Partner Selection in Alliances," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(5), pages 837-854, October.
    19. Denise Rossato Quatrin & Breno Augusto Diniz Pereira, 2017. "Who Should They Relate To? A Study For the Identification and Analysis of Criteria to the Partners’ Selection in Inter-Organizational Networks," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 14(3), pages 321-335, May.
    20. Guodong Yu & Li Zhang & Huiping Sun, 2018. "A Method for Partner Selection of Supply Chain Using Interval-Valued Fuzzy Sets — Fuzzy Choquet Integral and Improved Dempster–Shafer Theory," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(06), pages 1777-1804, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    open innovation projects; MCDM; IT2FD; IT2F AHP; IT2F PROMETHEE;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:14:p:3168-:d:1197431. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.