IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v8y2020i2p191-d316592.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determining Weights in Multi-Criteria Decision Making Based on Negation of Probability Distribution under Uncertain Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Chao Sun

    (Institute of Fundamental and Frontier Science, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610054, China
    School of information and Communication Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China)

  • Shiying Li

    (Glasgow College, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610054, China)

  • Yong Deng

    (Institute of Fundamental and Frontier Science, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610054, China)

Abstract

Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) refers to the decision making in the limited or infinite set of conflicting schemes. At present, the general method is to obtain the weight coefficients of each scheme based on different criteria through the expert questionnaire survey, and then use the Dempster–Shafer Evidence Theory (D-S theory) to model all schemes into a complete identification framework to generate the corresponding basic probability assignment (BPA). The scheme with the highest belief value is then chosen. In the above process, using different methods to determine the weight coefficient will have different effects on the final selection of alternatives. To reduce the uncertainty caused by subjectively determining the weight coefficients of different criteria and further improve the level of multi-criteria decision-making, this paper combines negation of probability distribution with evidence theory and proposes a weights-determining method in MCDM based on negation of probability distribution. Through the quantitative evaluation of the fuzzy degree of the criterion, the uncertainty caused by human subjective factors is reduced, and the subjective error is corrected to a certain extent.

Suggested Citation

  • Chao Sun & Shiying Li & Yong Deng, 2020. "Determining Weights in Multi-Criteria Decision Making Based on Negation of Probability Distribution under Uncertain Environment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-15, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:2:p:191-:d:316592
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/2/191/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/2/191/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chao Fu & Dong-Ling Xu, 2016. "Determining attribute weights to improve solution reliability and its application to selecting leading industries," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 245(1), pages 401-426, October.
    2. Xu, Paiheng & Zhang, Rong & Deng, Yong, 2018. "A novel visibility graph transformation of time series into weighted networks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 201-208.
    3. Tao Wang & Xiaoguang Wei & Tao Huang & Jun Wang & Luis Valencia-Cabrera & Zhennan Fan & Mario J. Pérez-Jiménez, 2019. "Cascading Failures Analysis Considering Extreme Virus Propagation of Cyber-Physical Systems in Smart Grids," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-15, March.
    4. Mo, Hongming & Deng, Yong, 2019. "Identifying node importance based on evidence theory in complex networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 529(C).
    5. Yang, Guo-liang & Yang, Jian-Bo & Xu, Dong-Ling & Khoveyni, Mohammad, 2017. "A three-stage hybrid approach for weight assignment in MADM," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 93-105.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhao, Jie & Wang, Yunchuan & Deng, Yong, 2020. "Identifying influential nodes in complex networks from global perspective," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    2. Yige Xue & Yong Deng, 2020. "Refined Expected Value Decision Rules under Orthopair Fuzzy Environment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-14, March.
    3. Jinyi Hu, 2023. "Linguistic Multiple-Attribute Decision Making Based on Regret Theory and Minimax-DEA," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-14, October.
    4. Chen, Wei & Hou, Xiaoli & Jiang, Manrui & Jiang, Cheng, 2022. "Identifying systemically important financial institutions in complex network: A case study of Chinese stock market," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    5. Feng Li & Qingyuan Zhu & Liang Liang, 2019. "A new data envelopment analysis based approach for fixed cost allocation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 274(1), pages 347-372, March.
    6. Lu Gan & Yuanyuan Wang & Yusheng Wang & Benjamin Lev & Wenjing Shen & Wen Jiang, 2021. "Coupling coordination analysis with data-driven technology for disaster–economy–ecology system: an empirical study in China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 107(3), pages 2123-2153, July.
    7. Wang, Fang & Wang, Lin & Chen, Yuming, 2022. "Multi-affine visible height correlation analysis for revealing rich structures of fractal time series," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    8. Zhang, Zhi-Gang & Hu, Xiao & Liu, Zhao-Ting & Zhao, Lu-Tao, 2021. "Multi-attribute decision making: An innovative method based on the dynamic credibility of experts," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 393(C).
    9. Katharina Gompf & Marzia Traverso & Jörg Hetterich, 2021. "Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to Introduce Weights to Social Life Cycle Assessment of Mobility Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-10, January.
    10. Sangho Lee & Jeongsub Choi & Youngdoo Son, 2024. "Efficient visibility algorithm for high-frequency time-series: application to fault diagnosis with graph convolutional network," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 339(1), pages 813-833, August.
    11. Shen Yan & Sing Kiong Nguang & Liruo Zhang, 2019. "Nonfragile Integral-Based Event-Triggered Control of Uncertain Cyber-Physical Systems under Cyber‐Attacks," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-14, November.
    12. Chao Fu & Weiyong Liu & Wenjun Chang, 2020. "Data-driven multiple criteria decision making for diagnosis of thyroid cancer," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 293(2), pages 833-862, October.
    13. Xu, Sheng & Tu, Haicheng & Xia, Yongxiang, 2023. "Resilience enhancement of renewable cyber–physical power system against malware attacks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    14. Yang, Guo-liang & Fukuyama, Hirofumi & Song, Yao-yao, 2018. "Measuring the inefficiency of Chinese research universities based on a two-stage network DEA model," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 10-30.
    15. Dai, Peng-Fei & Xiong, Xiong & Zhou, Wei-Xing, 2019. "Visibility graph analysis of economy policy uncertainty indices," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 531(C).
    16. Wen, Tao & Deng, Yong, 2020. "The vulnerability of communities in complex networks: An entropy approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    17. Chen, Sai & Ding, Yueting & Zhang, Yanfang & Zhang, Ming & Nie, Rui, 2022. "Study on the robustness of China's oil import network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).
    18. Chafi, Mohammadreza Shafiee & Narm, Hossein Gholizade & Kalat, Ali Akbarzadeh, 2023. "Chaotic and stochastic evaluation in Fluxgate magnetic sensors," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    19. Liu, Hao-Ran & Li, Ming-Xia & Zhou, Wei-Xing, 2024. "Visibility graph analysis of the grains and oilseeds indices," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 650(C).
    20. Dongye Sun & Yuanhua Jia & Lingqiao Qin & Yang Yang & Juyong Zhang, 2018. "A Variance Maximization Based Weight Optimization Method for Railway Transportation Safety Performance Measurement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-13, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:2:p:191-:d:316592. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.