IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i23p3676-d1528024.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing Metaheuristic Algorithm Performance Through Structured Population and Evolutionary Game Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Héctor Escobar-Cuevas

    (Department of Electro-Photonic Engineering, Universidad de Guadalajara, CUCEI, Av. Revolución 1500, Guadalajara 44430, Jalisco, Mexico)

  • Erik Cuevas

    (Department of Electro-Photonic Engineering, Universidad de Guadalajara, CUCEI, Av. Revolución 1500, Guadalajara 44430, Jalisco, Mexico)

  • Alberto Luque-Chang

    (Department of Electro-Photonic Engineering, Universidad de Guadalajara, CUCEI, Av. Revolución 1500, Guadalajara 44430, Jalisco, Mexico)

  • Oscar Barba-Toscano

    (Department of Electro-Photonic Engineering, Universidad de Guadalajara, CUCEI, Av. Revolución 1500, Guadalajara 44430, Jalisco, Mexico)

  • Marco Pérez-Cisneros

    (Department of Electro-Photonic Engineering, Universidad de Guadalajara, CUCEI, Av. Revolución 1500, Guadalajara 44430, Jalisco, Mexico)

Abstract

Diversity is crucial for metaheuristic algorithms. It prevents early convergence, balances exploration and exploitation, and helps to avoid local optima. Traditional metaheuristic algorithms tend to rely on a single strategy for generating new solutions, often resulting in a lack of diversity. In contrast, employing multiple strategies encourages a variety of search behaviors and a diverse pool of potential solutions, thereby improving the exploration of the search space. Evolutionary Game Theory (EGT) modifies agents’ strategies through competition, promoting successful strategies and eliminating weaker ones. Structured populations, as opposed to unstructured ones, preserve diverse strategies through localized competition, meaning that an individual’s strategy is influenced by only a subset or group of the population and not all elements. This paper presents a novel metaheuristic method based on EGT applied to structured populations. Initially, individuals are positioned near optimal regions using the Metropolis–Hastings algorithm. Subsequently, each individual is endowed with a unique search strategy. Considering a certain number of clusters, the complete population is segmented. Within these clusters, the method enhances search efficiency and solution quality by adapting all strategies through an intra-cluster competition. To assess the effectiveness of the proposed method, it has been compared against several well-known metaheuristic algorithms across a suite of 30 test functions. The results indicated that the new methodology outperformed the established techniques, delivering higher-quality solutions and faster convergence rates.

Suggested Citation

  • Héctor Escobar-Cuevas & Erik Cuevas & Alberto Luque-Chang & Oscar Barba-Toscano & Marco Pérez-Cisneros, 2024. "Enhancing Metaheuristic Algorithm Performance Through Structured Population and Evolutionary Game Theory," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-44, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:23:p:3676-:d:1528024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/23/3676/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/23/3676/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jorgen W. Weibull, 1997. "Evolutionary Game Theory," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262731215, December.
    2. Hammerstein, Peter & Selten, Reinhard, 1994. "Game theory and evolutionary biology," Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, in: R.J. Aumann & S. Hart (ed.), Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 28, pages 929-993, Elsevier.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kulsum, Umma & Alam, Muntasir & Kamrujjaman, Md., 2024. "Modeling and investigating the dilemma of early and delayed vaccination driven by the dynamics of imitation and aspiration," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    2. Dufwenberg, Martin & Güth, Werner, 1997. "Indirect evolution versus strategic delegation: A comparison of two approaches to explaining economic institutions," SFB 373 Discussion Papers 1997,28, Humboldt University of Berlin, Interdisciplinary Research Project 373: Quantification and Simulation of Economic Processes.
    3. Hart, Sergiu, 2002. "Evolutionary dynamics and backward induction," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 227-264, November.
    4. Sergio Monsalve, 2002. "Teoría de juegos: ¿hacia dónde vamos? (60 años después de von Neumann y Morgenstern)," Revista de Economía Institucional, Universidad Externado de Colombia - Facultad de Economía, vol. 4(7), pages 114-130, July-Dece.
    5. Weibull, Jörgen W., 1997. "What have we learned from Evolutionary Game Theory so far?," Working Paper Series 487, Research Institute of Industrial Economics, revised 26 Oct 1998.
    6. Escobar-Cuevas, Héctor & Cuevas, Erik & Gálvez, Jorge & Toski, Miguel, 2024. "A novel optimization approach based on unstructured evolutionary game theory," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 454-472.
    7. Martin Dufwenberg & Werner Guth, 2003. "Indirect Evolution Versus Strategic Delegation," Levine's Working Paper Archive 618897000000000789, David K. Levine.
    8. Werner Güth & Stefan Napel, 2006. "Inequality Aversion in a Variety of Games - An Indirect Evolutionary Analysis," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 116(514), pages 1037-1056, October.
    9. Dufwenberg, Martin, 1997. "Some relationships between evolutionary stability criteria in games," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 45-50, November.
    10. Lichi Zhang & Yanyan Jiang & Junmin Wu, 2022. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of Government and Residents’ Participation in Waste Separation Based on Cumulative Prospect Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-16, November.
    11. Gu, Tianqi & Xu, Weiping & Liang, Hua & He, Qing & Zheng, Nan, 2024. "School bus transport service strategies’ policy-making mechanism – An evolutionary game approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    12. Mahmoud Mahfouz & Angelos Filos & Cyrine Chtourou & Joshua Lockhart & Samuel Assefa & Manuela Veloso & Danilo Mandic & Tucker Balch, 2019. "On the Importance of Opponent Modeling in Auction Markets," Papers 1911.12816, arXiv.org.
    13. Guohui Song & Yongbin Wang, 2021. "Mainstream Value Information Push Strategy on Chinese Aggregation News Platform: Evolution, Modelling and Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-17, October.
    14. Sandholm,W.H., 2003. "Excess payoff dynamics, potential dynamics, and stable games," Working papers 5, Wisconsin Madison - Social Systems.
    15. Angelo Antoci & Simone Borghesi & Marcello Galeotti, 2013. "Environmental options and technological innovation: an evolutionary game model," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 247-269, April.
    16. Hui Yu & Wei Wang & Baohua Yang & Cunfang Li, 2019. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of the Stress Effect of Cross-Regional Transfer of Resource-Exhausted Enterprises," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-16, November.
    17. Funk, Matt, 2008. "On the Problem of Sustainable Economic Development: A Theoretical Solution to this Prisoner's Dilemma," MPRA Paper 19025, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 08 Jun 2008.
    18. Müller, Stephan, 2014. "The evolution of inequality aversion in a simplified game of life," University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics 219, University of Goettingen, Department of Economics.
    19. Witte, Björn-Christopher, 2012. "Fund managers - Why the best might be the worst: On the evolutionary vigor of risk-seeking behavior," Economics Discussion Papers 2012-20, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    20. Antonio Cabrales & Giovanni Ponti, 2000. "Implementation, Elimination of Weakly Dominated Strategies and Evolutionary Dynamics," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 3(2), pages 247-282, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:23:p:3676-:d:1528024. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.