IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i21p3394-d1510164.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technology Empowers Finance: Boundaries and Risks

Author

Listed:
  • Zheng Ji

    (School of Economics and Management, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
    Institute of National Development and Policy Research, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China)

  • Xiaoqi Zhang

    (Institute of National Development and Policy Research, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China)

  • Han Liang

    (Dong Fureng Institute of Economic and Social Development, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)

  • Yang Lyu

    (Dong Fureng Institute of Economic and Social Development, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)

Abstract

BigTech credit has enhanced financial inclusion, but it also poses concerns with its boundaries. This article uses theoretical frameworks and numerical simulations to examine the risks and inclusiveness of technology-empowered credit services for “long-tail” clients. This research discovered that the discrepancy between the commercial boundaries of BigTech credit and the technical limitations of risk management poses a risk in BigTech credit. The expanding boundaries of BigTech’s credit business may mitigate the representativeness of the data, resulting in a systematic deviation of unclear characteristics from the training sample data, which reduces the risk-control model’s ability to identify long-tail customers and raises the risk of credit defaults. Further computer simulations validate these results and demonstrate that competition among various companies would expedite the market’s transition over the boundary in case of a capital shortage. Finally, this article proposes setting up a joint-stock social unified credit technology company with data assets as an investment to facilitate the healthy and orderly development of financial technology institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Zheng Ji & Xiaoqi Zhang & Han Liang & Yang Lyu, 2024. "Technology Empowers Finance: Boundaries and Risks," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-17, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:21:p:3394-:d:1510164
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/21/3394/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/21/3394/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jon Frost & Leonardo Gambacorta & Yi Huang & Hyun Song Shin & Pablo Zbinden, 2019. "BigTech and the changing structure of financial intermediation," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 34(100), pages 761-799.
    2. Mas-Colell, Andreu & Whinston, Michael D. & Green, Jerry R., 1995. "Microeconomic Theory," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195102680.
    3. Bao, Zhengyang & Huang, Difang, 2021. "Shadow Banking in a Crisis: Evidence from Fintech During COVID-19," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 56(7), pages 2320-2355, November.
    4. Richard J. Arend, 2023. "Big Tech, Competition Policy, and Strategic Management: An Alternative Perspective to Teece," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, November.
    5. Stiglitz, Joseph E & Weiss, Andrew, 1981. "Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 71(3), pages 393-410, June.
    6. Seth Freedman & Ginger Zhe Jin, 2008. "Do Social Networks Solve Information Problems for Peer-to-Peer Lending? Evidence from Prosper.com," Working Papers 08-43, NET Institute.
    7. Mingfeng Lin & Nagpurnanand R. Prabhala & Siva Viswanathan, 2013. "Judging Borrowers by the Company They Keep: Friendship Networks and Information Asymmetry in Online Peer-to-Peer Lending," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(1), pages 17-35, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Käfer Benjamin, 2018. "Peer-to-Peer Lending – A (Financial Stability) Risk Perspective," Review of Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 69(1), pages 1-25, April.
    2. Qizhi Tao & Yizhe Dong & Ziming Lin, 2017. "Who can get money? Evidence from the Chinese peer-to-peer lending platform," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 425-441, June.
    3. Rajkamal Iyer & Asim Ijaz Khwaja & Erzo F. P. Luttmer & Kelly Shue, 2016. "Screening Peers Softly: Inferring the Quality of Small Borrowers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(6), pages 1554-1577, June.
    4. Oleksandr Talavera & Haofeng Xu, 2018. "Role of Verification in Peer-to-Peer Lending," Working Papers 2018-25, Swansea University, School of Management.
    5. Qizhi Tao & Yizhe Dong & Ziming Lin, 0. "Who can get money? Evidence from the Chinese peer-to-peer lending platform," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-17.
    6. Ninghua Du & Lingfang Li & Tian Lu & Xianghua Lu, 2020. "Prosocial Compliance in P2P Lending: A Natural Field Experiment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(1), pages 315-333, January.
    7. Yeujun Yoon & Yu Li & Yan Feng, 2019. "Factors affecting platform default risk in online peer-to-peer (P2P) lending business: an empirical study using Chinese online P2P platform data," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 131-158, March.
    8. Janvier D. Nkurunziza, 2005. "Reputation and Credit without Collateral in Africa`s Formal Banking," Economics Series Working Papers WPS/2005-02, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    9. Kong, Dongmin & Pan, Yue & Tian, Gary Gang & Zhang, Pengdong, 2020. "CEOs' hometown connections and access to trade credit: Evidence from China," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    10. Bieta, Volker & Broll, Udo & Siebe, Wilfried, 2014. "Collateral in banking policy: On the possibility of signaling," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 137-141.
    11. Ruyi Ge & Juan Feng & Bin Gu, 2016. "Borrower’s default and self-disclosure of social media information in P2P lending," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 2(1), pages 1-6, December.
    12. Juanjuan Chen & Yabin Zhang & Zhujia Yin, 2018. "Education Premium In The Online Peer-To-Peer Lending Marketplace: Evidence From The Big Data In China," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 63(01), pages 45-64, March.
    13. Xueru Chen & Xiaoji Hu & Shenglin Ben, 2021. "How do reputation, structure design and FinTech ecosystem affect the net cash inflow of P2P lending platforms? Evidence from China," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 1055-1082, December.
    14. Biancini, Sara & Verdier, Marianne, 2023. "Bank-platform competition in the credit market," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    15. Peng Wang & Haichao Zheng & Dongyu Chen & Liangchao Ding, 2015. "Exploring the critical factors influencing online lending intentions," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 1-11, December.
    16. de Roure, Calebe & Pelizzon, Loriana & Tasca, Paolo, 2016. "How does P2P lending fit into the consumer credit market?," Discussion Papers 30/2016, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    17. Yanhong Guo & Shuai Jiang & Wenjun Zhou & Chunyu Luo & Hui Xiong, 2021. "A predictive indicator using lender composition for loan evaluation in P2P lending," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 1-24, December.
    18. Kraemer-Eis, Helmut & Botsari, Antonia & Gvetadze, Salome & Lang, Frank & Torfs, Wouter, 2019. "European Small Business Finance Outlook: December 2019," EIF Working Paper Series 2019/61, European Investment Fund (EIF).
    19. Dorfleitner, Gregor & Rad, Jacqueline & Weber, Martina, 2017. "Pricing in the online invoice trading market: First empirical evidence," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 56-61.
    20. Galema, Rients, 2020. "Credit rationing in P2P lending to SMEs: Do lender-borrower relationships matter?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:21:p:3394-:d:1510164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.