IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i19p3119-d1492705.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding Public Opinion towards ESG and Green Finance with the Use of Explainable Artificial Intelligence

Author

Listed:
  • Wihan van der Heever

    (College of Computing and Data Science, Nanyang Technological University, 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore 639798, Singapore)

  • Ranjan Satapathy

    (Institute of High Performance Computing (IHPC), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 1 Fusionopolis Way, #16-16 Connexis, Singapore 138632, Singapore)

  • Ji Min Park

    (Nanyang Business School, Nanyang Technological University, Gaia, 91 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore 639956, Singapore)

  • Erik Cambria

    (College of Computing and Data Science, Nanyang Technological University, 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore 639798, Singapore)

Abstract

This study leverages explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) techniques to analyze public sentiment towards Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors, climate change, and green finance. It does so by developing a novel multi-task learning framework combining aspect-based sentiment analysis, co-reference resolution, and contrastive learning to extract nuanced insights from a large corpus of social media data. Our approach integrates state-of-the-art models, including the SenticNet API, for sentiment analysis and implements multiple XAI methods such as LIME, SHAP, and Permutation Importance to enhance interpretability. Results reveal predominantly positive sentiment towards environmental topics, with notable variations across ESG categories. The contrastive learning visualization demonstrates clear sentiment clustering while highlighting areas of uncertainty. This research contributes to the field by providing an interpretable, trustworthy AI system for ESG sentiment analysis, offering valuable insights for policymakers and business stakeholders navigating the complex landscape of sustainable finance and climate action. The methodology proposed in this paper advances the current state of AI in ESG and green finance in several ways. By combining aspect-based sentiment analysis, co-reference resolution, and contrastive learning, our approach provides a more comprehensive understanding of public sentiment towards ESG factors than traditional methods. The integration of multiple XAI techniques (LIME, SHAP, and Permutation Importance) offers a transparent view of the subtlety of the model’s decision-making process, which is crucial for building trust in AI-driven ESG assessments. Our approach enables a more accurate representation of public opinion, essential for informed decision-making in sustainable finance. This paper paves the way for more transparent and explainable AI applications in critical domains like ESG.

Suggested Citation

  • Wihan van der Heever & Ranjan Satapathy & Ji Min Park & Erik Cambria, 2024. "Understanding Public Opinion towards ESG and Green Finance with the Use of Explainable Artificial Intelligence," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-21, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:19:p:3119-:d:1492705
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/19/3119/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/19/3119/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wei Jie Yeo & Wihan van der Heever & Rui Mao & Erik Cambria & Ranjan Satapathy & Gianmarco Mengaldo, 2023. "A Comprehensive Review on Financial Explainable AI," Papers 2309.11960, arXiv.org.
    2. Samuel Drempetic & Christian Klein & Bernhard Zwergel, 2020. "The Influence of Firm Size on the ESG Score: Corporate Sustainability Ratings Under Review," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(2), pages 333-360, November.
    3. Caroline Flammer & Michael W. Toffel & Kala Viswanathan, 2021. "Shareholder activism and firms' voluntary disclosure of climate change risks," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(10), pages 1850-1879, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vincenzo D'Apice & Giovanni Ferri & Mariantonietta Intonti, 2021. "Sustainable disclosure versus ESG intensity: Is there a cross effect between holding and SRI funds?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5), pages 1496-1510, September.
    2. Spira, Robin, 2024. "How does ESG rating disagreement influence analyst forecast dispersion?," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 9(3), pages 1769-1804.
    3. Scholz, Robert, 2023. "Unternehmensmitbestimmung und die sozialökologische Transformation: Zusammenhang zwischen Mitbestimmungsindex und ESG-Kriterien in börsennotierten Unternehmen," Mitbestimmungsreport 79, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.
    4. Andreas Wagner & Denise Fischer‐Kreer, 2024. "The role of CEO regulatory focus in increasing or reducing corporate carbon emissions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 1051-1065, February.
    5. Natalia Semenova, 2021. "Management control systems in response to social and environmental risk in large Nordic companies," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-11, December.
    6. Ren, Xiaohang & Zeng, Gudian & Zhao, Yang, 2023. "Digital finance and corporate ESG performance: Empirical evidence from listed companies in China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    7. Finja Lena Kind & Jennifer Zeppenfeld & Rainer Lueg, 2023. "The impact of chief executive officer narcissism on environmental, social, and governance reporting," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4448-4466, November.
    8. Jun Wan & Yuejia Wang & Yuan Wang, 2025. "Promoting or Hindering: The Impact of ESG Rating Differences on Energy Enterprises’ Green Transformation—A Causal Test from Double Machine-Learning Algorithms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-21, January.
    9. Ameen Qasem & Shaker Dahan AL-Duais & Wan Nordin Wan-Hussin & Hasan Mohamad Bamahros & Abdulsalam Alquhaif & Murad Thomran, 2022. "Institutional Ownership Types and ESG Reporting: The Case of Saudi Listed Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-23, September.
    10. Vincent Leow Chee Ho & Lim Jian Yi & Noorsidi Aizuddin Bin Mat Noor & Rohaya Binti Abdul Jalil, 2024. "Assessing the Listed Property Companies Readiness Towards Environmental Social Governance Implementation in Malaysia," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(7), pages 2514-2524, July.
    11. Liu, Benjamin & Johl, Shireenjit & Lasantha, Ruwan, 2023. "ESG scores and cash holdings: The role of disciplinary trading," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 55(PA).
    12. Chen, Zhixiong & Sugiyama, Kohei & Tasaka, Kazuyuki & Kito, Tomomi & Yasuda, Yukihiro, 2024. "Impact of environmental, social and governance initiatives on firm value: Analysis using AI-based ESG scores for Japanese listed firms," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(PA).
    13. Lee, Michael T. & Raschke, Robyn L. & Krishen, Anjala S., 2023. "Understanding ESG scores and firm performance: Are high-performing firms E, S, and G-balanced?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    14. Cheng, Louis T.W. & Shen, Jianfu & Wojewodzki, Michal, 2023. "A cross-country analysis of corporate carbon performance: An international investment perspective," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    15. Chao Li & Mian Wu & Wenli Huang, 2023. "Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance and Enterprise Dynamic Financial Behavior: Evidence from Panel Vector Autoregression," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(2), pages 281-295, January.
    16. Diana Elena VASIU, 2024. "Esg Rates Divergence On The Emerging Markets In The European Union," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 19(2), pages 274-289, August.
    17. Patrick Velte, 2023. "Which institutional investors drive corporate sustainability? A systematic literature review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 42-71, January.
    18. Damberg, Sarah V. & Hartmann, Julia & Heese, H. Sebastian, 2022. "Does bad press help or hinder sustainable supply chain management? An empirical investigation of US-based corporations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    19. Yinju Nie & Ming Jia, 2021. "The power of crowds: can minority shareholder activism promote management earnings forecast accuracy," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(5), pages 6333-6385, December.
    20. Liyuan Meng & Yuchen Zhang, 2023. "Impact of Tax Administration on ESG Performance—A Quasi-Natural Experiment Based on China’s Golden Tax Project III," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-23, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:19:p:3119-:d:1492705. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.