IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i3p464-d1572426.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Promoting or Hindering: The Impact of ESG Rating Differences on Energy Enterprises’ Green Transformation—A Causal Test from Double Machine-Learning Algorithms

Author

Listed:
  • Jun Wan

    (School of Management, Wuhan Textile University, Wuhan 430200, China)

  • Yuejia Wang

    (School of International Tourism and Public Management, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China)

  • Yuan Wang

    (School of Business Administration, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510642, China)

Abstract

There is a lack of comprehensive evaluation on the impact of ESG rating differences on the green transformation of energy enterprises in the transition era. This study leverages data from companies listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange in China, applying double machine-learning algorithms to precisely estimate the causal relationship between variations in ESG ratings and the green transition efficiency of energy companies. The research shows that the difference in ESG ratings of third-party rating agencies significantly promotes the efficiency of green transformation of energy enterprises. This paper also studies the influencing factors of this effect: First, ESG rating differences significantly promote the improvement of green transition efficiency of energy enterprises; Second, the positive effect is more pronounced in energy companies with more balanced board structures. Finally, energy companies with high capital market attention can also contribute to this positive impact. Through the mechanism test, this paper finds that enterprise green innovation is an important mechanism for ESG rating divergence to positively promote the efficiency of energy enterprises’ green transformation. Furthermore, this paper analyzes the impact of ESG rating on enterprises from the perspective of market cognition and short-term behavior, which provides a new perspective for analyzing the practice of enterprises pursuing long-term transformation. The study also calls for a more sober reflection on the trend toward ESG in society.

Suggested Citation

  • Jun Wan & Yuejia Wang & Yuan Wang, 2025. "Promoting or Hindering: The Impact of ESG Rating Differences on Energy Enterprises’ Green Transformation—A Causal Test from Double Machine-Learning Algorithms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-21, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:3:p:464-:d:1572426
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/3/464/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/3/464/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Victor Chernozhukov & Denis Chetverikov & Mert Demirer & Esther Duflo & Christian Hansen & Whitney Newey & James Robins, 2018. "Double/debiased machine learning for treatment and structural parameters," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 21(1), pages 1-68, February.
    2. Satyabrata Aich & Ayusha Thakur & Deepanjan Nanda & Sushanta Tripathy & Hee-Cheol Kim, 2021. "Factors Affecting ESG towards Impact on Investment: A Structural Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-14, September.
    3. Maha Faisal Alsayegh & Rashidah Abdul Rahman & Saeid Homayoun, 2020. "Corporate Economic, Environmental, and Social Sustainability Performance Transformation through ESG Disclosure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Alessio Baratta & Antonio Cimino & Francesco Longo & Vittorio Solina & Saverino Verteramo, 2023. "The Impact of ESG Practices in Industry with a Focus on Carbon Emissions: Insights and Future Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-20, April.
    5. Amir Amel-Zadeh & George Serafeim, 2018. "Why and How Investors Use ESG Information: Evidence from a Global Survey," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 74(3), pages 87-103, July.
    6. Mustafa Disli & Mustafa Kemal Yilmaz & Farah Finn Mohamud Mohamed, 2022. "Board characteristics and sustainability performance: empirical evidence from emerging markets," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(4), pages 929-952, January.
    7. Beatty, Randolph P. & Ritter, Jay R., 1986. "Investment banking, reputation, and the underpricing of initial public offerings," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(1-2), pages 213-232.
    8. Stiglitz, Joseph E, 1985. "Credit Markets and the Control of Capital," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 17(2), pages 133-152, May.
    9. Grigoris Giannarakis & Andreas Andronikidis & Nikolaos Sariannidis, 2020. "Determinants of environmental disclosure: investigating new and conventional corporate governance characteristics," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 294(1), pages 87-105, November.
    10. Samuel Drempetic & Christian Klein & Bernhard Zwergel, 2020. "The Influence of Firm Size on the ESG Score: Corporate Sustainability Ratings Under Review," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(2), pages 333-360, November.
    11. Łukasz Jarosław Kozar & Adam Sulich, 2023. "Energy Sector’s Green Transformation towards Sustainable Development: A Review and Future Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-18, July.
    12. Ni Wang & Haiying Pan & Yuze Feng & Sixuan Du, 2023. "How do ESG practices create value for businesses? Research review and prospects," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(5), pages 1155-1177, February.
    13. James Cordeiro & Manish Tewari, 2015. "Firm Characteristics, Industry Context, and Investor Reactions to Environmental CSR: A Stakeholder Theory Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 130(4), pages 833-849, September.
    14. Yunfu Zhu & Haoling Yang & Ma Zhong, 2023. "Do ESG Ratings of Chinese Firms Converge or Diverge? A Comparative Analysis Based on Multiple Domestic and International Ratings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-17, August.
    15. Avramov, Doron & Cheng, Si & Lioui, Abraham & Tarelli, Andrea, 2022. "Sustainable investing with ESG rating uncertainty," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 642-664.
    16. Clement, Ronald W., 2005. "The lessons from stakeholder theory for U.S. business leaders," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 255-264.
    17. Sanjay Sharma & Audun Ruud, 2003. "On the path to sustainability: integrating social dimensions into the research and practice of environmental management," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(4), pages 205-214, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Zhen & Chu, Erming & Hao, Yukai, 2024. "Towards sustainable development: How does ESG performance promotes corporate green transformation," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    2. Cini, Federico & Ferrari, Annalisa, 2025. "Towards the estimation of ESG ratings: A machine learning approach using balance sheet ratios," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(PB).
    3. Jin Zhu & Fei Huang, 2023. "Transformational Leadership, Organizational Innovation, and ESG Performance: Evidence from SMEs in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-23, March.
    4. Cheng, Louis T.W. & Cheong, Tsun Se & Wojewodzki, Michal & Chui, David, 2025. "The effect of ESG divergence on the financial performance of Hong Kong-listed firms: An artificial neural network approach," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(PA).
    5. Caterina Lucarelli & Sabrina Severini, 2024. "Anatomy of the chimera: Environmental, Social, and Governance ratings beyond the myth," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 4198-4217, July.
    6. Yang, Yuan & Wang, Baomin & Su, Xingyu, 2024. "Judicial quality and corporate ESG performance: Evidence from the establishment of circuit courts," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    7. Beat Reber & Agnes Gold & Stefan Gold, 2022. "ESG Disclosure and Idiosyncratic Risk in Initial Public Offerings," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(3), pages 867-886, September.
    8. Liu, Xiangqiang & Yang, Qingqing & Wei, Kai & Dai, Peng-Fei, 2024. "ESG rating disagreement and idiosyncratic return volatility: Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(PB).
    9. Diana Elena VASIU, 2024. "Esg Rates Divergence On The Emerging Markets In The European Union," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 19(2), pages 274-289, August.
    10. Deli Wang & Ke Peng & Kaiye Tang & Yewei Wu, 2022. "Does Fintech Development Enhance Corporate ESG Performance? Evidence from an Emerging Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-21, December.
    11. Barbara Rocha Gonzaga & Marcelo Cabus Klotzle & Talles Vianna Brugni & Ileana-Sorina Rakos & Ionela Cornelia Cioca & Cristian-Marian Barbu & Teodora Cucerzan, 2024. "The ESG Patterns of Emerging-Market Companies: Are There Differences in Their Sustainable Behavior after COVID-19?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-41, January.
    12. Chang Liu & Zihao Xin, 2024. "Does environmental, social, and governance practice boost corporate human capital inflow in China? From the perspective of stakeholder response," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 3251-3273, July.
    13. Huang, Ruilei & Wei, Jiuchang, 2023. "Does CEOs’ green experience affect environmental corporate social responsibility? Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 205-231.
    14. Lorenzo Dal Maso & Laura Gianfagna & Federico Maglione & Nicola Lattanzi, 2024. "Going green: Environmental risk management, market value and performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 122-132, January.
    15. Nguyen Vinh Khuong & Vu Tran Trong Tai & Nguyen Thi Phuong Thao & Pham Minh Tuan & Tran Tuan Dung & Vo Tuong Khanh, 2024. "Corporate governance and corporate carbon disclosures: The moderating role of earnings management," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 4596-4611, September.
    16. Danni Yu & Tiantian Meng & Minyu Zheng & Rongyi Ma, 2024. "ESG uncertainty, investor attention and stock price crash risk in China: evidence from PVAR model analysis," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    17. Tristan Jourde & Arthur Stalla-Bourdillon, 2024. "PEnvironmental Preferences and Sector Valuations," Working papers 964, Banque de France.
    18. Yan, Meilan & Li, Youwei & Pantelous, Athanasios A. & Vigne, Samuel A. & Zhang, Dalu, 2024. "A comparative and conceptual intellectual study of environmental topic in economic and finance," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    19. Tian, Tian & Chen, Ning, 2024. "How does entrepreneurship promote corporate ESG performance?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA).
    20. Abhishek Behl & P. S. Raghu Kumari & Harnesh Makhija & Dipasha Sharma, 2022. "Exploring the relationship of ESG score and firm value using cross-lagged panel analyses: case of the Indian energy sector," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 313(1), pages 231-256, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:3:p:464-:d:1572426. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.