IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i14p2183-d1433557.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Marshall–Olkin Bivariate Weibull Model with Modified Singularity (MOBW- μ ): A Study of Its Properties and Correlation Structure

Author

Listed:
  • Hugo Brango

    (Departamento de Matemáticas y Estadística, Universidad del Norte, Barranquilla 080001, Colombia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Angie Guerrero

    (Departamento de Matemáticas y Estadística, Universidad del Norte, Barranquilla 080001, Colombia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Humberto Llinás

    (Departamento de Matemáticas y Estadística, Universidad del Norte, Barranquilla 080001, Colombia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

We propose the “Marshall–Olkin Bivariate Weibull Model with Modified Singularity MOBW- μ ”, which focuses on bivariate distributions essential for reliability and survival analyses. Distributions such as the Marshall–Olkin bivariate exponential (MOBE) and the Marshall–Olkin bivariate Weibull (MOBW) are discussed. The MOBW- μ model is introduced, which incorporates a lag parameter μ in the singular part, and probabilistic properties such as the joint survival function, marginal density functions, and the bivariate hazard rate function are explored. In addition, aspects such as the correlation structure and survival copulation are addressed and we show that the correlation of the MOBW- μ is always lower than that of its copula, regardless of the parameters. The latter result implies that the MOBW- μ does not have the Lancaster’s phenomenon that explains that any nonlinear transformation of variables decreases the correlation in absolute value. The article concludes by presenting a robust theoretical framework applicable to various disciplines.

Suggested Citation

  • Hugo Brango & Angie Guerrero & Humberto Llinás, 2024. "Marshall–Olkin Bivariate Weibull Model with Modified Singularity (MOBW- μ ): A Study of Its Properties and Correlation Structure," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-16, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:14:p:2183-:d:1433557
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/14/2183/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/14/2183/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Angelo Koudou, 1998. "Lancaster bivariate probability distributions with Poisson, negative binomial and gamma margins," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 7(1), pages 95-110, June.
    2. Li, Xiaohu & Pellerey, Franco, 2011. "Generalized Marshall-Olkin distributions and related bivariate aging properties," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 102(10), pages 1399-1409, November.
    3. Papadatos, Nickos & Xifara, Tatiana, 2013. "A simple method for obtaining the maximal correlation coefficient and related characterizations," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 102-114.
    4. Alexander J. McNeil & Rüdiger Frey & Paul Embrechts, 2015. "Quantitative Risk Management: Concepts, Techniques and Tools Revised edition," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 2, number 10496.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Papadatos, Nickos, 2014. "Some counterexamples concerning maximal correlation and linear regression," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 114-117.
    2. Abduraimova, Kumushoy, 2022. "Contagion and tail risk in complex financial networks," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    3. Tobias Fissler & Yannick Hoga, 2024. "How to Compare Copula Forecasts?," Papers 2410.04165, arXiv.org.
    4. Masahiko Egami & Rusudan Kevkhishvili, 2020. "Time reversal and last passage time of diffusions with applications to credit risk management," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 795-825, July.
    5. Avanzi, Benjamin & Taylor, Greg & Wong, Bernard & Yang, Xinda, 2021. "On the modelling of multivariate counts with Cox processes and dependent shot noise intensities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 9-24.
    6. Pfeifer Dietmar & Mändle Andreas & Ragulina Olena, 2017. "New copulas based on general partitions-of-unity and their applications to risk management (part II)," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 246-255, October.
    7. Diba Daraei & Kristina Sendova, 2024. "Determining Safe Withdrawal Rates for Post-Retirement via a Ruin-Theory Approach," Risks, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, April.
    8. Makam, Vaishno Devi & Millossovich, Pietro & Tsanakas, Andreas, 2021. "Sensitivity analysis with χ2-divergences," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 372-383.
    9. Nevrla, Matěj, 2020. "Systemic risk in European financial and energy sectors: Dynamic factor copula approach," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 44(4).
    10. H. Kaibuchi & Y. Kawasaki & G. Stupfler, 2022. "GARCH-UGH: a bias-reduced approach for dynamic extreme Value-at-Risk estimation in financial time series," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(7), pages 1277-1294, July.
    11. Battulga Gankhuu, 2022. "Merton's Default Risk Model for Private Company," Papers 2208.01974, arXiv.org.
    12. Saminger-Platz Susanne & Kolesárová Anna & Šeliga Adam & Mesiar Radko & Klement Erich Peter, 2024. "On comprehensive families of copulas involving the three basic copulas and transformations thereof," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 12(1), pages 1-36.
    13. Stephan Schlüter & Fabian Menz & Milena Kojić & Petar Mitić & Aida Hanić, 2022. "A Novel Approach to Generate Hourly Photovoltaic Power Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-16, April.
    14. Borowska, Agnieszka & Hoogerheide, Lennart & Koopman, Siem Jan & van Dijk, Herman K., 2020. "Partially censored posterior for robust and efficient risk evaluation," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 217(2), pages 335-355.
    15. Dietmar Pfeifer & Olena Ragulina, 2018. "Generating VaR Scenarios under Solvency II with Product Beta Distributions," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-15, October.
    16. E. Ramos-P'erez & P. J. Alonso-Gonz'alez & J. J. N'u~nez-Vel'azquez, 2020. "Forecasting volatility with a stacked model based on a hybridized Artificial Neural Network," Papers 2006.16383, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2020.
    17. Gorgi, P. & Koopman, S.J., 2023. "Beta observation-driven models with exogenous regressors: A joint analysis of realized correlation and leverage effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 237(2).
    18. Dimitris Bertsimas & Agni Orfanoudaki, 2021. "Algorithmic Insurance," Papers 2106.00839, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2022.
    19. Pellerey, Franco & Shaked, Moshe & Yasaei Sekeh, Salimeh, 2012. "Comparisons of concordance in additive models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 82(11), pages 2059-2067.
    20. Tim J. Boonen & Wing Fung Chong & Mario Ghossoub, 2024. "Pareto‐efficient risk sharing in centralized insurance markets with application to flood risk," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 91(2), pages 449-488, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:14:p:2183-:d:1433557. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.