IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i13p1951-d1420836.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Similarity-Based Three-Way Clustering by Using Dimensionality Reduction

Author

Listed:
  • Anlong Li

    (School of Computer, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212100, China)

  • Yiping Meng

    (School of Science, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212100, China)

  • Pingxin Wang

    (School of Science, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212100, China)

Abstract

Three-way clustering uses core region and fringe region to describe a cluster, which divide the dataset into three parts. The division helps identify the central core and outer sparse regions of a cluster. One of the main challenges in three-way clustering is the meaningful construction of the two sets. Aimed at handling high-dimensional data and improving the stability of clustering, this paper proposes a novel three-way clustering method. The proposed method uses dimensionality reduction techniques to reduce data dimensions and eliminate noise. Based on the reduced dataset, random sampling and feature extraction are performed multiple times to introduce randomness and diversity, enhancing the algorithm’s robustness. Ensemble strategies are applied on these subsets, and the k-means algorithm is utilized to obtain multiple clustering results. Based on these results, we obtain co-association frequency between different samples and fused clustering result using the single-linkage method of hierarchical clustering. In order to describe the core region and fringe region of each cluster, the similar class of each sample is defined by co-association frequency. The lower and upper approximations of each cluster are obtained based on similar class. The samples in the lower approximation of each cluster belong to the core region of the cluster. The differences between lower and upper approximations of each cluster are defined as fringe region. Therefore, a three-way explanation of each cluster is naturally formed. By employing various UC Irvine Machine Learning Repository (UCI) datasets and comparing different clustering metrics such as Normalized Mutual Information (NMI), Adjusted Rand Index (ARI), and Accuracy (ACC), the experimental results show that the proposed strategy is effective in improving the structure of clustering results.

Suggested Citation

  • Anlong Li & Yiping Meng & Pingxin Wang, 2024. "Similarity-Based Three-Way Clustering by Using Dimensionality Reduction," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-19, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:13:p:1951-:d:1420836
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/13/1951/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/13/1951/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Warren Torgerson, 1952. "Multidimensional scaling: I. Theory and method," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 17(4), pages 401-419, December.
    2. Tingfeng Wu & Jiachen Fan & Pingxin Wang, 2022. "An Improved Three-Way Clustering Based on Ensemble Strategy," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexander Strehl & Joydeep Ghosh, 2003. "Relationship-Based Clustering and Visualization for High-Dimensional Data Mining," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 15(2), pages 208-230, May.
    2. Venera Tomaselli, 1996. "Multivariate statistical techniques and sociological research," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 253-276, August.
    3. Oscar Claveria & Enric Monte & Salvador Torra, 2017. "A new approach for the quantification of qualitative measures of economic expectations," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(6), pages 2685-2706, November.
    4. Bijmolt, T.H.A. & Wedel, M., 1996. "A Monte Carlo Evaluation of Maximum Likelihood Multidimensional Scaling Methods," Other publications TiSEM f72cc9d8-f370-43aa-a224-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    5. Jinkai Yu & Wenjing Bi, 2019. "Evolution of Marine Environmental Governance Policy in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-14, September.
    6. Walesiak Marek & Dudek Andrzej, 2017. "Selecting the Optimal Multidimensional Scaling Procedure for Metric Data With R Environment," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 18(3), pages 521-540, September.
    7. Mirta Galesic & A. Walkyria Goode & Thomas S. Wallsten & Kent L. Norman, 2018. "Using Tversky’s contrast model to investigate how features of similarity affect judgments of likelihood," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 13(2), pages 163-169, March.
    8. Lewis, R.M. & Trosset, M.W., 2006. "Sensitivity analysis of the strain criterion for multidimensional scaling," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 135-153, January.
    9. Morales José F. & Song Tingting & Auerbach Arleen D. & Wittkowski Knut M., 2008. "Phenotyping Genetic Diseases Using an Extension of µ-Scores for Multivariate Data," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 1-20, June.
    10. Benjamin B. Risk & David S. Matteson & David Ruppert & Ani Eloyan & Brian S. Caffo, 2014. "An evaluation of independent component analyses with an application to resting-state fMRI," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(1), pages 224-236, March.
    11. Carter T. Butts & Kathleen M. Carley, 2005. "Some Simple Algorithms for Structural Comparison," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 291-305, December.
    12. Raatikainen, Mika & Skön, Jukka-Pekka & Leiviskä, Kauko & Kolehmainen, Mikko, 2016. "Intelligent analysis of energy consumption in school buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 416-429.
    13. José Luis Ortega Priego, 2003. "A Vector Space Model as a methodological approach to the Triple Helix dimensionality: A comparative study of Biology and Biomedicine Centres of two European National Research Councils from a Webometri," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 58(2), pages 429-443, October.
    14. Christopher T. Whelan & Mario Lucchini & Maurizio Pisati & Maitre, Bertrand, 2009. "Understanding the Socio-Economic Distribution and Consequences of Patterns of Multiple Deprivation: An Application of Self-Organising Maps," Papers WP302, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    15. Péladeau, Normand & Dagenais, Christian & Ridde, Valéry, 2017. "Concept mapping internal validity: A case of misconceived mapping?," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 56-63.
    16. W. Alan Nicewander & Joseph Lee Rodgers, 2022. "Obituary: Bruce McArthur Bloxom 1938–2020," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(3), pages 1042-1044, September.
    17. Panpan Yu & Qingna Li, 2018. "Ordinal Distance Metric Learning with MDS for Image Ranking," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 35(01), pages 1-19, February.
    18. Paul F. M. Krabbe & Joshua A. Salomon & Christopher J. L. Murray, 2007. "Quantification of Health States with Rank-Based Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 27(4), pages 395-405, July.
    19. Valeria Glorioso & Maurizio Pisati, 2014. "Socioeconomic inequality in health-related behaviors: a lifestyle approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(5), pages 2859-2879, September.
    20. Yan Liu & Changshun Liu & Jingjing Song & Xibei Yang & Taihua Xu & Pingxin Wang, 2023. "Multi-Scale Annulus Clustering for Multi-Label Classification," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:13:p:1951-:d:1420836. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.