IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i6p859-d766646.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of a Methodology for Forecasting the Sustainable Development of Industry in Russia Based on the Tools of Factor and Discriminant Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Aleksey I. Shinkevich

    (Logistics and Management Department, Kazan National Research Technological University, 420015 Kazan, Russia)

  • Alsu R. Akhmetshina

    (Graduate School of Business, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University, 420008 Kazan, Russia)

  • Ruslan R. Khalilov

    (Graduate School of Business, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University, 420008 Kazan, Russia)

Abstract

The problem of sustainable development is one of the central issues on the agenda of the global community. However, it is difficult to assess the pace and quality of sustainable development of individual economic systems—in particular, industry—due to the lack of a unified methodological approach. In this regard, the following research goal was formulated—to develop and test a methodology for forecasting sustainable development by using statistical tools. The achievement of the goal was facilitated by the application of formalization methods, factor analysis, discriminant analysis, the method of weighted sum of the criteria, and the method of comparison. The results of the study are new scientific and practical solutions that develop the ability to diagnose economic systems for the transition to environmentally friendly production. Firstly, methodological solutions are proposed to assess the nature of the transition of industry to sustainable development (low, medium, or high rate). The methodology is based on the proposed aggregated indicator of sustainable industrial development based on the results of factor analysis (by the method of principal components). As a result, the patterns of sustainable development of the extractive and manufacturing sectors of the Russian economy are revealed. Secondly, integral indicators of economic, environmental and social factors of sustainable development are calculated, and classification functions for each type of industrial transition to sustainable development (low, medium, or high) are formed through discriminant analysis. Scenarios of industrial development are developed, taking into account the multidirectional trajectories of the socioeconomic development of the country. Thirdly, the DFD model of the process of scenario forecasting of sustainable industrial development is formalized, reflecting the movement of data flows necessary for forecasting sustainable industrial development. It is revealed that the manufacturing industry is expected to maintain a low rate of transition to sustainable development. On the contrary, for the extractive industry, if efforts and resources are concentrated on environmental innovations, average transition rates are predicted. The uniqueness of the proposed approach lies in combining two types of multivariate statistical analysis and taking into account the indicators that characterize the contribution of industrial enterprises to sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Aleksey I. Shinkevich & Alsu R. Akhmetshina & Ruslan R. Khalilov, 2022. "Development of a Methodology for Forecasting the Sustainable Development of Industry in Russia Based on the Tools of Factor and Discriminant Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:6:p:859-:d:766646
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/6/859/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/6/859/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Geraldo Cardoso de Oliveira Neto & Roberto Rodrigues Leite & Wagner Cezar Lucato & Rosangela Maria Vanalle & Marlene Amorim & João Carlos Oliveira Matias & Vikas Kumar, 2022. "Overcoming Barriers to the Implementation of Cleaner Production in Small Enterprises in the Mechanics Industry: Exploring Economic Gains and Contributions for Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Oda, Ryoya & Suzuki, Yuya & Yanagihara, Hirokazu & Fujikoshi, Yasunori, 2020. "A consistent variable selection method in high-dimensional canonical discriminant analysis," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    3. Marina V. Shinkevich & Aleksey I. Shinkevich & Alexey D. Chudnovskiy & Irina V. Lushchik & Gulnara N. Kaigorodova & Izida I. Ishmuradova & Svetlana A. Bashkirtseva & Ludmila V. Marfina & Tatiana A. Zh, 2016. "Formalization of Sustainable Innovative Development Process in the Model of Innovations Diffusion," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 6(1), pages 179-184.
    4. Tatiana S. Degai & Natalia Khortseva & Maria Monakhova & Andrey N. Petrov, 2021. "Municipal Programs and Sustainable Development in Russian Northern Cities: Case Studies of Murmansk and Magadan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, November.
    5. Kristin Linnerud & Erling Holden & Morten Simonsen, 2021. "Closing the sustainable development gap: A global study of goal interactions," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(4), pages 738-753, July.
    6. Diego A. Vazquez-Brust & José Antonio Plaza-Úbeda, 2021. "What Characteristics Do the Firms Have That Go Beyond Compliance with Regulation in Environmental Protection? A Multiple Discriminant Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-27, February.
    7. Vera P. Samarina & Tatiana P. Skufina & Diana Yu. Savon & Alexey I. Shinkevich, 2021. "Management of Externalities in the Context of Sustainable Development of the Russian Arctic Zone," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-12, July.
    8. Xingang Zhao & Yuzhuo Zhang & Ji Liang & Yanbin Li & Rongda Jia & Ling Wang, 2018. "The Sustainable Development of the Economic-Energy-Environment (3E) System under the Carbon Trading (CT) Mechanism: A Chinese Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, January.
    9. Mateusz Lewandowski, 2016. "Designing the Business Models for Circular Economy—Towards the Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-28, January.
    10. Stelios Grafakos & Alberto Gianoli & Alexandra Tsatsou, 2016. "Towards the Development of an Integrated Sustainability and Resilience Benefits Assessment Framework of Urban Green Growth Interventions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-33, May.
    11. Andrey Novoselov & Ivan Potravny & Irina Novoselova & Violetta Gassiy, 2022. "Social Investing Modeling for Sustainable Development of the Russian Arctic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-18, January.
    12. Sahu, Omprakash, 2021. "Appropriateness of rose (Rosa hybrida) for bioethanol conversion with enzymatic hydrolysis: Sustainable development on green fuel production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    13. Svetlana Ratner & Konstantin Gomonov & Svetlana Revinova & Inna Lazanyuk, 2021. "Ecolabeling as a Policy Instrument for More Sustainable Development: The Evidence of Supply and Demand Interactions from Russia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-21, August.
    14. Joel A. Martínez-Regalado & Cinthia Leonora Murillo-Avalos & Purificación Vicente-Galindo & Mónica Jiménez-Hernández & José Luis Vicente-Villardón, 2021. "Using HJ-Biplot and External Logistic Biplot as Machine Learning Methods for Corporate Social Responsibility Practices for Sustainable Development," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(20), pages 1-16, October.
    15. Aleksey I. Shinkevich & Irina G. Ershova & Farida F. Galimulina & Alla A. Yarlychenko, 2021. "Innovative Mesosystems Algorithm for Sustainable Development Priority Areas Identification in Industry Based on Decision Trees Construction," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(23), pages 1-18, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aleksey I. Shinkevich & Irina G. Ershova & Farida F. Galimulina & Alla A. Yarlychenko, 2021. "Innovative Mesosystems Algorithm for Sustainable Development Priority Areas Identification in Industry Based on Decision Trees Construction," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(23), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Pina Puntillo, 2023. "Circular economy business models: Towards achieving sustainable development goals in the waste management sector—Empirical evidence and theoretical implications," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 941-954, March.
    3. María E. Aguilar-Fernández & José Ramon Otegi-Olaso, 2018. "Firm Size and the Business Model for Sustainable Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-27, December.
    4. Nadia Preghenella & Cinzia Battistella, 2021. "Exploring business models for sustainability: A bibliographic investigation of the literature and future research directions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2505-2522, July.
    5. Yue, Tingyi & Wang, Honglei & Li, Chengjiang & Hu, Yu-jie, 2024. "Optimization strategies for green power and certificate trading in China considering seasonality: An evolutionary game-based system dynamics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    6. Saja Kosanović & Mirjana Miletić & Ljubo Marković, 2021. "Energy Refurbishment of Family Houses in Serbia in Line with the Principles of Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-14, May.
    7. Anna Barford & Saffy Rose Ahmad, 2021. "A Call for a Socially Restorative Circular Economy: Waste Pickers in the Recycled Plastics Supply Chain," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 761-782, September.
    8. Mariale Moreno & Carolina De los Rios & Zoe Rowe & Fiona Charnley, 2016. "A Conceptual Framework for Circular Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-15, September.
    9. Yaliu Yang & Yuan Wang & Cui Wang & Yingyan Zhang & Cuixia Zhang, 2022. "Temporal and Spatial Evolution of the Science and Technology Innovative Efficiency of Regional Industrial Enterprises: A Data-Driven Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-21, August.
    10. Tariq Javed & Fareyha Said & Dalilawati Zainal & Azlina Abdul Jalil, 2024. "Circular Economy Implementation Status of Selected ASEAN Countries," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(1), pages 21582440231, March.
    11. Jam Shahzaib Khan & Rozana Zakaria & Siti Mazzuana Shamsudin & Nur Izie Adiana Abidin & Shaza Rina Sahamir & Darul Nafis Abbas & Eeydzah Aminudin, 2019. "Evolution to Emergence of Green Buildings: A Review," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-20, January.
    12. Nancy Bocken & Lars Strupeit & Katherine Whalen & Julia Nußholz, 2019. "A Review and Evaluation of Circular Business Model Innovation Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-25, April.
    13. Luigi Fusco Girard & Marilena Vecco, 2021. "The “Intrinsic Value” of Cultural Heritage as Driver for Circular Human-Centered Adaptive Reuse," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-28, March.
    14. Castro-Lopez, Adrian & Iglesias, Victor & Santos-Vijande, María Leticia, 2023. "Organizational capabilities and institutional pressures in the adoption of circular economy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    15. Chembessi Chedrak & Gohoungodji Paulin & Juste Rajaonson, 2023. "“A fine wine, better with age”: Circular economy historical roots and influential publications: A bibliometric analysis using Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy (RPYS)," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(6), pages 1593-1612, December.
    16. Stanislav Mráz, 2016. "Je Humanitárna Intervencia V Súlade S Medzinárodným Právom?," Almanach (Actual Issues in World Economics and Politics), Ekonomická univerzita, Fakulta medzinárodných vzťahov, vol. 11(4), pages 14-19.
    17. María Jesús Ávila-Gutiérrez & Alejandro Martín-Gómez & Francisco Aguayo-González & Juan Ramón Lama-Ruiz, 2020. "Eco-Holonic 4.0 Circular Business Model to Conceptualize Sustainable Value Chain towards Digital Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-32, March.
    18. Gilbert Silvius & Aydan Ismayilova & Vicente Sales-Vivó & Micol Costi, 2021. "Exploring Barriers for Circularity in the EU Furniture Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-25, October.
    19. Pamučar, Dragan & Durán-Romero, Gemma & Yazdani, Morteza & López, Ana M., 2023. "A decision analysis model for smart mobility system development under circular economy approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    20. Vinit Parida & Joakim Wincent, 2019. "Why and how to compete through sustainability: a review and outline of trends influencing firm and network-level transformation," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:6:p:859-:d:766646. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.