IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i20p3875-d946551.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predicting Angle of Internal Friction and Cohesion of Rocks Based on Machine Learning Algorithms

Author

Listed:
  • Niaz Muhammad Shahani

    (School of Mines, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
    The State Key Laboratory for Geo Mechanics and Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Barkat Ullah

    (School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Kausar Sultan Shah

    (Department of Mining Engineering, Karakoram International University, Gilgit 15100, Pakistan)

  • Fawad Ul Hassan

    (School of Mines, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
    Department of Mining Engineering, Baluchistan University of Information Technology, Engineering and Management Sciences, Quetta 87300, Pakistan)

  • Rashid Ali

    (School of Mathematics and Statistics, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Mohamed Abdelghany Elkotb

    (Mechanical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia
    Mechanical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh 33516, Egypt)

  • Mohamed E. Ghoneim

    (Department of Mathematical Sciences, Faculty of Applied Science, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 21955, Saudi Arabia
    Faculty of Computers and Artificial Intelligence, Damietta University, Damietta 34517, Egypt)

  • Elsayed M. Tag-Eldin

    (Center of Research and Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Future University in Egypt, New Cairo 11835, Egypt)

Abstract

The safe and sustainable design of rock slopes, open-pit mines, tunnels, foundations, and underground excavations requires appropriate and reliable estimation of rock strength and deformation characteristics. Cohesion (𝑐) and angle of internal friction (πœ‘) are the two key parameters widely used to characterize the shear strength of materials. Thus, the prediction of these parameters is essential to evaluate the deformation and stability of any rock formation. In this study, four advanced machine learning (ML)-based intelligent prediction models, namely Lasso regression (LR), ridge regression (RR), decision tree (DT), and support vector machine (SVM), were developed to predict 𝑐 in (MPa) and πœ‘ in (Β°), with P-wave velocity in (m/s), density in (gm/cc), UCS in (MPa), and tensile strength in (MPa) as input parameters. The actual dataset having 199 data points with no missing data was allocated identically for each model with 70% for training and 30% for testing purposes. To enhance the performance of the developed models, an iterative 5-fold cross-validation method was used. The coefficient of determination (R 2 ), mean absolute error (MAE), mean square error (MSE), root mean square error (RMSE), and a10-index were used as performance metrics to evaluate the optimal prediction model. The results revealed the SVM to be a more efficient model in predicting 𝑐 (R 2 = 0.977) and πœ‘ (R 2 = 0.916) than LR (𝑐: R 2 = 0.928 and πœ‘: R 2 = 0.606), RR (𝑐: R 2 = 0.961 and πœ‘: R 2 = 0.822), and DT (𝑐: R 2 = 0.934 and πœ‘: R 2 = 0.607) on the testing data. Furthermore, to check the level of accuracy of the SVM model, a sensitivity analysis was performed on the testing data. The results showed that UCS and tensile strength were the most influential parameters in predicting 𝑐 and πœ‘. The findings of this study contribute to long-term stability and deformation evaluation of rock masses in surface and subsurface rock excavations.

Suggested Citation

  • Niaz Muhammad Shahani & Barkat Ullah & Kausar Sultan Shah & Fawad Ul Hassan & Rashid Ali & Mohamed Abdelghany Elkotb & Mohamed E. Ghoneim & Elsayed M. Tag-Eldin, 2022. "Predicting Angle of Internal Friction and Cohesion of Rocks Based on Machine Learning Algorithms," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(20), pages 1-17, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:20:p:3875-:d:946551
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/20/3875/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/20/3875/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peng Xiao & Guoyan Zhao & Huanxin Liu, 2022. "Failure Transition and Validity of Brazilian Disc Test under Different Loading Configurations: A Numerical Study," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(15), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Niaz Muhammad Shahani & Xigui Zheng & Xiaowei Guo & Xin Wei, 2022. "Machine Learning-Based Intelligent Prediction of Elastic Modulus of Rocks at Thar Coalfield," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-24, March.
    3. Barkat Ullah & Muhammad Kamran & Yichao Rui, 2022. "Predictive Modeling of Short-Term Rockburst for the Stability of Subsurface Structures Using Machine Learning Approaches: t-SNE, K-Means Clustering and XGBoost," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-20, January.
    4. Yangchun Wu & Linqi Huang & Xibing Li & Yide Guo & Huilin Liu & Jiajun Wang, 2022. "Effects of Strain Rate and Temperature on Physical Mechanical Properties and Energy Dissipation Features of Granite," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, May.
    5. Hui Zou & Trevor Hastie, 2005. "Addendum: Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(5), pages 768-768, November.
    6. Hui Zou & Trevor Hastie, 2005. "Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(2), pages 301-320, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Linqi Huang & Shaofeng Wang & Xin Cai & Zhengyang Song, 2022. "Mathematical Problems in Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-3, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tutz, Gerhard & Pâßnecker, Wolfgang & Uhlmann, Lorenz, 2015. "Variable selection in general multinomial logit models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 207-222.
    2. Oxana Babecka Kucharcukova & Jan Bruha, 2016. "Nowcasting the Czech Trade Balance," Working Papers 2016/11, Czech National Bank.
    3. Carstensen, Kai & Heinrich, Markus & Reif, Magnus & Wolters, Maik H., 2020. "Predicting ordinary and severe recessions with a three-state Markov-switching dynamic factor model," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 829-850.
    4. Hou-Tai Chang & Ping-Huai Wang & Wei-Fang Chen & Chen-Ju Lin, 2022. "Risk Assessment of Early Lung Cancer with LDCT and Health Examinations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-12, April.
    5. Margherita Giuzio, 2017. "Genetic algorithm versus classical methods in sparse index tracking," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 40(1), pages 243-256, November.
    6. Nicolaj N. MΓΌhlbach, 2020. "Tree-based Synthetic Control Methods: Consequences of moving the US Embassy," CREATES Research Papers 2020-04, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    7. Wang, Qiao & Zhou, Wei & Cheng, Yonggang & Ma, Gang & Chang, Xiaolin & Miao, Yu & Chen, E, 2018. "Regularized moving least-square method and regularized improved interpolating moving least-square method with nonsingular moment matrices," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 325(C), pages 120-145.
    8. Dmitriy Drusvyatskiy & Adrian S. Lewis, 2018. "Error Bounds, Quadratic Growth, and Linear Convergence of Proximal Methods," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(3), pages 919-948, August.
    9. Mkhadri, Abdallah & Ouhourane, Mohamed, 2013. "An extended variable inclusion and shrinkage algorithm for correlated variables," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 631-644.
    10. Lucian Belascu & Alexandra Horobet & Georgiana Vrinceanu & Consuela Popescu, 2021. "Performance Dissimilarities in European Union Manufacturing: The Effect of Ownership and Technological Intensity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    11. Candelon, B. & Hurlin, C. & Tokpavi, S., 2012. "Sampling error and double shrinkage estimation of minimum variance portfolios," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 511-527.
    12. Susan Athey & Guido W. Imbens & Stefan Wager, 2018. "Approximate residual balancing: debiased inference of average treatment effects in high dimensions," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 80(4), pages 597-623, September.
    13. Andrea Carriero & Todd E. Clark & Massimiliano Marcellino, 2022. "Specification Choices in Quantile Regression for Empirical Macroeconomics," Working Papers 22-25, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.
    14. Kim, Hyun Hak & Swanson, Norman R., 2018. "Mining big data using parsimonious factor, machine learning, variable selection and shrinkage methods," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 339-354.
    15. Shuichi Kawano, 2014. "Selection of tuning parameters in bridge regression models via Bayesian information criterion," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 55(4), pages 1207-1223, November.
    16. Yize Zhao & Matthias Chung & Brent A. Johnson & Carlos S. Moreno & Qi Long, 2016. "Hierarchical Feature Selection Incorporating Known and Novel Biological Information: Identifying Genomic Features Related to Prostate Cancer Recurrence," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(516), pages 1427-1439, October.
    17. ChuliΓ‘, Helena & GarrΓ³n, Ignacio & Uribe, Jorge M., 2024. "Daily growth at risk: Financial or real drivers? The answer is not always the same," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 762-776.
    18. Enrico Bergamini & Georg Zachmann, 2020. "Exploring EU’s Regional Potential in Low-Carbon Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-28, December.
    19. Jie Jian & Peijun Sang & Mu Zhu, 2024. "Two Gaussian Regularization Methods for Time-Varying Networks," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 29(4), pages 853-873, December.
    20. Qianyun Li & Runmin Shi & Faming Liang, 2019. "Drug sensitivity prediction with high-dimensional mixture regression," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-18, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:20:p:3875-:d:946551. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.