IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlogis/v5y2021i3p44-d586508.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Defining and Measuring the Relevance of Criteria for the Evaluation of the Inflow of Goods in City Centers

Author

Listed:
  • Mladen Jardas

    (Faculty of Maritime Studies, University of Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia)

  • Ana Perić Hadžić

    (Faculty of Maritime Studies, University of Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia)

  • Edvard Tijan

    (Faculty of Maritime Studies, University of Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia)

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to define and measure the relevance of the criteria for the evaluation of the inflow of goods in city centers, in order to improve delivery activities within city centers. The development of the city center leads to the grouping of numerous business operators, which results in the increase of the quantity of goods entering the city center, causing additional traffic congestion, higher levels of noise and emissions of harmful gases. In the long term, this leads to major dissatisfaction with the quality of life among city residents. Therefore, the planning of goods delivery must be in line with the sustainable development of city logistics, while at the same time considering the interests of relevant stakeholders. However, in the existing literature the criteria for evaluating delivery flows have not been comprehensively identified or evaluated by the stakeholders of city centers. In order to fill the research gap, the authors have defined four groups of criteria: technical-technological, economic-financial, organizational and social criteria. To determine the relevance of these criteria, it was necessary to use the questionnaire method to collect data from the stakeholder groups defined by the literature review. Regarding the relevant stakeholders (carriers, delivery recipients, residents and urban policy makers), the results have pointed out that the technical-technological and organizational criteria groups are considered the most relevant by the stakeholders regarding the inflow of goods in city centers.

Suggested Citation

  • Mladen Jardas & Ana Perić Hadžić & Edvard Tijan, 2021. "Defining and Measuring the Relevance of Criteria for the Evaluation of the Inflow of Goods in City Centers," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-15, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:5:y:2021:i:3:p:44-:d:586508
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/5/3/44/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/5/3/44/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edvard Tijan & Saša Aksentijević & Katarina Ivanić & Mladen Jardas, 2019. "Blockchain Technology Implementation in Logistics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-13, February.
    2. Jan Fabian Ehmke, 2012. "Attended Home Delivery," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Integration of Information and Optimization Models for Routing in City Logistics, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 23-33, Springer.
    3. Karine Evrard Samuel & Parisa Dolati Neghabadi & Marie-Laure Espinouse, 2016. "City logistics: a review and research framework," Post-Print hal-02056253, HAL.
    4. Giuseppe Munda, 2016. "Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis and Sustainable Development," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Salvatore Greco & Matthias Ehrgott & José Rui Figueira (ed.), Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis, edition 2, chapter 0, pages 1235-1267, Springer.
    5. Ivan Cardenas & Yari Borbon-Galvez & Thomas Verlinden & Eddy Van de Voorde & Thierry Vanelslander & Wouter Dewulf, 2017. "City logistics, urban goods distribution and last mile delivery and collection," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, , vol. 18(1-2), pages 22-43, March.
    6. Jan Fabian Ehmke, 2012. "Routing in City Logistics," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Integration of Information and Optimization Models for Routing in City Logistics, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 119-156, Springer.
    7. Angus Eugene Retallack & Bertram Ostendorf, 2019. "Current Understanding of the Effects of Congestion on Traffic Accidents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-13, September.
    8. Vijay Paidi & Roger G. Nyberg & Johan Håkansson, 2020. "Dynamic Scheduling and Communication System to Manage Last Mile Handovers," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-11, June.
    9. Juan Manuel Ramon-Jeronimo & Raquel Florez-Lopez & Maria Angeles Ramon-Jeronimo, 2017. "Understanding the Generation of Value along Supply Chains: Balancing Control Information and Relational Governance Mechanisms in Downstream and Upstream Relationships," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-31, August.
    10. Ward, E. John & Dimitriou, Harry T. & Dean, Marco, 2016. "Theory and background of multi-criteria analysis: Toward a policy-led approach to mega transport infrastructure project appraisal," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 21-45.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lázaro Florido-Benítez, 2022. "The Safety-Hygiene Air Corridor between UK and Spain Will Coexist with COVID-19," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-22, July.
    2. Anastasia D. Mitropoulou & Giannis T. Tsoulfas, 2021. "Using a Modified SERVQUAL Approach to Assess the Quality of Supply Chain Services in Greek Online Supermarkets," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-17, October.
    3. Raquel Soriano-Gonzalez & Elena Perez-Bernabeu & Yusef Ahsini & Patricia Carracedo & Andres Camacho & Angel A. Juan, 2023. "Analyzing Key Performance Indicators for Mobility Logistics in Smart and Sustainable Cities: A Case Study Centered on Barcelona," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-20, October.
    4. S. M. Talha Qadri & Ateeb Hamdan & Veena Raj & Muhsan Ehsan & Norazanita Shamsuddin & Mohammed Hail Hakimi & Khairul Azlan Mustapha, 2023. "Assessment of Land Surface Temperature from the Indian Cities of Ranchi and Dhanbad during COVID-19 Lockdown: Implications on the Urban Climatology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-23, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Techane Bosona, 2020. "Urban Freight Last Mile Logistics—Challenges and Opportunities to Improve Sustainability: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Wu, Ruijuan & Li, Peiyu, 2023. "Continuance intention to use self-delivery boxes: An empirical study in Tianjin, China," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    3. Shenle Pan & Vaggelis Giannikas & Yufei Han & Etta Grover-Silva & Bin Qiao, 2017. "Using Customer-related Data to Enhance E-grocery Home Delivery," Post-Print hal-01482901, HAL.
    4. Anna Corinna Cagliano & Alberto Marco & Giulio Mangano & Giovanni Zenezini, 2017. "Levers of logistics service providers’ efficiency in urban distribution," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 104-117, December.
    5. Avraham, Edison & Raviv, Tal, 2020. "The data-driven time-dependent traveling salesperson problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 25-40.
    6. Daniel Belanche & Marta Flavián & Alfredo Pérez-Rueda, 2020. "Mobile Apps Use and WOM in the Food Delivery Sector: The Role of Planned Behavior, Perceived Security and Customer Lifestyle Compatibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-21, May.
    7. Ivan Cardenas & Yari Borbon-Galvez & Thomas Verlinden & Eddy Van de Voorde & Thierry Vanelslander & Wouter Dewulf, 2017. "City logistics, urban goods distribution and last mile delivery and collection," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, , vol. 18(1-2), pages 22-43, March.
    8. Bruno P. Bruck & Filippo Castegini & Jean-François Cordeau & Manuel Iori & Tommaso Poncemi & Dario Vezzali, 2020. "A Decision Support System for Attended Home Services," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 50(2), pages 137-152, March.
    9. Duc C. Phan & Long T. Truong, 2024. "Traffic Congestion and Safety: Mixed Effects on Total and Fatal Crashes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-11, October.
    10. Kwang O. Park, 2020. "A Study on Sustainable Usage Intention of Blockchain in the Big Data Era: Logistics and Supply Chain Management Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-15, December.
    11. Khatab Alqararah, 2023. "Assessing the robustness of composite indicators: the case of the Global Innovation Index," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-22, December.
    12. Ehmke, Jan Fabian & Campbell, Ann M. & Thomas, Barrett W., 2018. "Optimizing for total costs in vehicle routing in urban areas," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 242-265.
    13. Van Asch, Thomas & Dewulf, Wouter & Kupfer, Franziska & Cárdenas, Ivan & Van de Voorde, Eddy, 2020. "Cross-border e-commerce logistics – Strategic success factors for airports," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    14. Xiaoxuan Wei & Meng Ye & Liang Yuan & Wei Bi & Weisheng Lu, 2022. "Analyzing the Freight Characteristics and Carbon Emission of Construction Waste Hauling Trucks: Big Data Analytics of Hong Kong," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-21, February.
    15. Berjawi, A.E.H. & Walker, S.L. & Patsios, C. & Hosseini, S.H.R., 2021. "An evaluation framework for future integrated energy systems: A whole energy systems approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    16. Thies, Christian & Kieckhäfer, Karsten & Spengler, Thomas S. & Sodhi, Manbir S., 2019. "Operations research for sustainability assessment of products: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(1), pages 1-21.
    17. Walther Zeug & Alberto Bezama & Urs Moesenfechtel & Anne Jähkel & Daniela Thrän, 2019. "Stakeholders’ Interests and Perceptions of Bioeconomy Monitoring Using a Sustainable Development Goal Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-24, March.
    18. Ehmke, Jan Fabian & Campbell, Ann Melissa, 2014. "Customer acceptance mechanisms for home deliveries in metropolitan areas," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(1), pages 193-207.
    19. Zsuzsanna Katalin Szabo & Zsombor Szádoczki & Sándor Bozóki & Gabriela C. Stănciulescu & Dalma Szabo, 2021. "An Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach for Prioritisation of Strategic Objectives of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-26, February.
    20. Hangwei Feng & Jinlin Wang & Yang Li, 2022. "An Efficient Blockchain Transaction Retrieval System," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:5:y:2021:i:3:p:44-:d:586508. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.