IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i11p1830-d1513497.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Multi-Scenario Simulation of Urban Expansion for Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region Considering Multilevel Urban Flows

Author

Listed:
  • Jiayi Hu

    (School of Information Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Dongya Liu

    (School of Information Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
    Observation and Research Station of Beijing Fangshan Comprehensive Exploration, Ministry of Natural Resources of the People’s Republic of China, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Xinqi Zheng

    (School of Information Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
    Observation and Research Station of Beijing Fangshan Comprehensive Exploration, Ministry of Natural Resources of the People’s Republic of China, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

With the development of urban agglomerations in China, the study of the interactions between cities has become a popular and difficult issue. Exploring the interactions between cities can help decision-makers optimize regional resource allocation and improve regional spatial patterns. Combining the urban flow model and the patch-generating land use simulation (PLUS) model, this study simulates and analyzes the process of urban expansion in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH) region, and investigates the impact of urban hierarchical structure differences on urban expansion. In this study, the role and influence of inter-city economy flow, transportation flow, population flow, and information flow on the development of urban agglomerations are comprehensively considered, and a multilevel urban interaction model is constructed based on a hierarchical generalized linear model (HGLM). Based on the national BTH cooperation and development strategy, a multi-scenario simulation study of urban expansion is carried out using the HGLM-PLUS model. The results indicate the following: (1) compared to the traditional PLUS model, the coupled HGLM-PLUS model, which considers multilevel urban flows, improved the overall accuracy by 0.047, the Kappa coefficient by 0.207, and the figure of merit (FoM) index by 0.051; (2) under different simulation scenarios, the development trend under the cooperation and development policy in the BTH region is more stable, demonstrating a relatively smooth urbanization expansion trend; and (3) under the BTH cooperation and development background, the total area of construction land in the BTH region is expected to be maintained at around 1,164,500 km 2 by 2040. The spatial expansion pattern will present a networked expansion with the core driving development, axes and belts connecting, and clusters breaking through.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiayi Hu & Dongya Liu & Xinqi Zheng, 2024. "Research on Multi-Scenario Simulation of Urban Expansion for Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region Considering Multilevel Urban Flows," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:11:p:1830-:d:1513497
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/11/1830/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/11/1830/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Youngjo Lee & John A. Nelder, 2006. "Double hierarchical generalized linear models (with discussion)," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 55(2), pages 139-185, April.
    2. Zhao, Liyuan & Zhou, Cong & Liu, Kaili & Huang, Liyang & Li, Zhi-chun, 2024. "Comparison of the driving mechanism between logistics land use and facilities: A case study from Wuhan metropolitan area," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yanyuan Ma & Marc G. Genton, 2010. "Explicit estimating equations for semiparametric generalized linear latent variable models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 72(4), pages 475-495, September.
    2. Bohua Yu & Wei Song & Yanqing Lang, 2017. "Spatial Patterns and Driving Forces of Greenhouse Land Change in Shouguang City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Leckie, George, 2014. "runmixregls: A Program to Run the MIXREGLS Mixed-Effects Location Scale Software from within Stata," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 59(c02).
    4. Rabindra Nath Das & Jeong-Soo Park, 2012. "Discrepancy in regression estimates between log-normal and gamma: some case studies," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 97-111, March.
    5. Sun-Joo Cho & Paul Boeck & Susan Embretson & Sophia Rabe-Hesketh, 2014. "Additive Multilevel Item Structure Models with Random Residuals: Item Modeling for Explanation and Item Generation," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 79(1), pages 84-104, January.
    6. Lee, Sangin & Lee, Youngjo & Pawitan, Yudi, 2018. "Sparse pathway-based prediction models for high-throughput molecular data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 125-135.
    7. Lee, Sangin & Pawitan, Yudi & Lee, Youngjo, 2015. "A random-effect model approach for group variable selection," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 147-157.
    8. Peter McCullagh, 2008. "Sampling bias and logistic models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(4), pages 643-677, September.
    9. I. Gijbels & I. Prosdocimi, 2011. "Smooth estimation of mean and dispersion function in extended generalized additive models with application to Italian induced abortion data," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(11), pages 2391-2411, December.
    10. Lee, Woojoo & Lim, Johan & Lee, Youngjo & del Castillo, Joan, 2011. "The hierarchical-likelihood approach to autoregressive stochastic volatility models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 248-260, January.
    11. Stephen R. Martin & Philippe Rast, 2022. "The Reliability Factor: Modeling Individual Reliability with Multiple Items from a Single Assessment," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(4), pages 1318-1342, December.
    12. Wu, Jianmin & Bentler, Peter M., 2013. "Limited information estimation in binary factor analysis: A review and extension," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 392-403.
    13. Lorenzo Carbonari & Alessio Farcomeni & Cosimo Petracchi & Giovanni Trovato, 2024. "Macroprudential Policies and Credit Volatility," Working Paper series 24-16, Rimini Centre for Economic Analysis.
    14. Rezzy Eko Caraka & Yusra Yusra & Toni Toharudin & Rung-Ching Chen & Mohammad Basyuni & Vilzati Juned & Prana Ugiana Gio & Bens Pardamean, 2021. "Did Noise Pollution Really Improve during COVID-19? Evidence from Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-12, May.
    15. Yu, Dalei & Yau, Kelvin K.W., 2012. "Conditional Akaike information criterion for generalized linear mixed models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(3), pages 629-644.
    16. Kwon, Sunghoon & Oh, Seungyoung & Lee, Youngjo, 2016. "The use of random-effect models for high-dimensional variable selection problems," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 401-412.
    17. Jiin Choi & Stewart J. Anderson & Thomas J. Richards & Wesley K. Thompson, 2014. "Prediction of transplant-free survival in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients using joint models for event times and mixed multivariate longitudinal data," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(10), pages 2192-2205, October.
    18. Yudi Pawitan & Youngjo Lee, 2017. "Wallet Game: Probability, Likelihood, and Extended Likelihood," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(2), pages 120-122, April.
    19. Meza, Cristian & Jaffrézic, Florence & Foulley, Jean-Louis, 2009. "Estimation in the probit normal model for binary outcomes using the SAEM algorithm," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 1350-1360, February.
    20. Fernanda B. Rizzato & Roseli A. Leandro & Clarice G.B. Demétrio & Geert Molenberghs, 2016. "A Bayesian approach to analyse overdispersed longitudinal count data," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(11), pages 2085-2109, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:11:p:1830-:d:1513497. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.