IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i5p979-d1136211.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deep Insight on Land Use/Land Cover Geospatial Assessment through Internet-Based Validation Tool in Upper Karkheh River Basin (KRB), South-West Iran

Author

Listed:
  • Sina Mallah

    (Department of Soil Science Engineering, University of Tehran, Karaj 77871-31587, Iran
    Department of Soil Physics and Irrigation, Soil and Water Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj 31779-93545, Iran)

  • Manouchehr Gorji

    (Department of Soil Science Engineering, University of Tehran, Karaj 77871-31587, Iran)

  • Mohammad Reza Balali

    (Department of Soil Chemistry, Fertility and Plant Nutrition, Soil and Water Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj 31779-93545, Iran)

  • Hossein Asadi

    (Department of Soil Science Engineering, University of Tehran, Karaj 77871-31587, Iran)

  • Naser Davatgar

    (Department of Soil Physics and Irrigation, Soil and Water Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj 31779-93545, Iran)

  • Hojjat Varmazyari

    (Department of Agricultural Management and Development, University of Tehran, Karaj 31779-93545, Iran)

  • Anna Maria Stellacci

    (Department of Soil, Plant and Food Sciences, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Via Amendola 165/A, 70126 Bari, Italy)

  • Mirko Castellini

    (Council for Agricultural Research and Economics-Research Center for Agriculture and Environment (CREA-AA), Via C. Ulpiani 5, 70125 Bari, Italy)

Abstract

Recently, the demand for high-quality land use/land cover (LULC) information for near-real-time crop type mapping, in particular for multi-relief landscapes, has increased. While the LULC classes are inherently imbalanced, the statistics generally overestimate the majority classes and underestimate the minority ones. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the classes of the 10 m European Satellite Agency (ESA) WorldCover 2020 land use/land cover product with the support of the Google Earth Engine (GEE) in the Honam sub-basin, south-west Iran, using the LACOVAL (validation tool for regional-scale land cover and land cover change) online platform. The effect of imbalanced ground truth has also been explored. Four sampling schemes were employed on a total of 720 collected ground truth points over approximately 14,100 ha. The grassland and cropland totally canopied 94% of the study area, while barren land, shrubland, trees and built-up covered the rest. The results of the validation accuracy showed that the equalized sampling scheme was more realistically successful than the others in terms of roughly the same overall accuracy (91.6%), mean user’s accuracy (91.6%), mean producers’ accuracy (91.9%), mean partial portmanteau (91.9%) and kappa (0.9). The product was statistically improved to 93.5% ± 0.04 by the assembling approach and segmented with the help of supplementary datasets and visual interpretation. The findings confirmed that, in mapping LULC, data of classes should be balanced before accuracy assessment. It is concluded that the product is a reliable dataset for environmental modeling at the regional scale but needs some modifications for barren land and grassland classes in mountainous semi-arid regions of the globe.

Suggested Citation

  • Sina Mallah & Manouchehr Gorji & Mohammad Reza Balali & Hossein Asadi & Naser Davatgar & Hojjat Varmazyari & Anna Maria Stellacci & Mirko Castellini, 2023. "Deep Insight on Land Use/Land Cover Geospatial Assessment through Internet-Based Validation Tool in Upper Karkheh River Basin (KRB), South-West Iran," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-22, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:5:p:979-:d:1136211
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/5/979/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/5/979/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rui Liu & Yun Chen & Jianping Wu & Lei Gao & Damian Barrett & Tingbao Xu & Xiaojuan Li & Linyi Li & Chang Huang & Jia Yu, 2017. "Integrating Entropy‐Based Naïve Bayes and GIS for Spatial Evaluation of Flood Hazard," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(4), pages 756-773, April.
    2. Megersa Kebede Leta & Tamene Adugna Demissie & Jens Tränckner, 2021. "Modeling and Prediction of Land Use Land Cover Change Dynamics Based on Land Change Modeler (LCM) in Nashe Watershed, Upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-24, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sonu Thaivalappil Sukumaran & Stephen J. Birkinshaw, 2024. "Investigating the Impact of Recent and Future Urbanization on Flooding in an Indian River Catchment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-22, July.
    2. Alule, RJ & Nuwategeka, E & Oriangi, G, 2023. "Assessment Of Population Dynamics And Forest Cover Change In Yumbe District, Uganda," African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development (AJFAND), African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development (AJFAND), vol. 23(5), May.
    3. Harik, G. & Alameddine, I. & Zurayk, R. & El-Fadel, M., 2023. "Uncertainty in forecasting land cover land use at a watershed scale: Towards enhanced sustainable land management," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 486(C).
    4. Belay Z. Abate & Tewodros T. Assefa & Tibebe B. Tigabu & Wubneh B. Abebe & Li He, 2023. "Hydrological Modeling of the Kobo-Golina River in the Data-Scarce Upper Danakil Basin, Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-23, February.
    5. Yang Zhang & Nazhalati Naerkezi & Yun Zhang & Bo Wang, 2024. "Multi-Scenario Land Use/Cover Change and Its Impact on Carbon Storage Based on the Coupled GMOP-PLUS-InVEST Model in the Hexi Corridor, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-22, February.
    6. Yajun Ma & Ping Zhang & Kaixu Zhao & Yong Zhou & Sidong Zhao, 2022. "A Dynamic Performance and Differentiation Management Policy for Urban Construction Land Use Change in Gansu, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-31, June.
    7. Yilun Zhao & Yan Rong & Yiyi Liu & Tianshu Lin & Liangji Kong & Qinqin Dai & Runzi Wang, 2023. "Investigating Urban Flooding and Nutrient Export under Different Urban Development Scenarios in the Rouge River Watershed in Michigan, USA," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-25, December.
    8. Markos Mathewos & Semaria Moga Lencha & Misgena Tsegaye, 2022. "Land Use and Land Cover Change Assessment and Future Predictions in the Matenchose Watershed, Rift Valley Basin, Using CA-Markov Simulation," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-28, September.
    9. Jie Chen & Ruijie Shi & Geng Sun & Ya Guo & Min Deng & Xiuyuan Zhang, 2023. "Simulation-Based Optimization of the Urban Thermal Environment through Local Climate Zones Reorganization in Changsha City, China with the FLUS Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-28, August.
    10. Yecheng He & Weicheng Wu & Xinyuan Xie & Xinxin Ke & Yifei Song & Cuimin Zhou & Wenjing Li & Yuan Li & Rong Jing & Peixia Song & Linqian Fu & Chunlian Mao & Meng Xie & Sicheng Li & Aohui Li & Xiaoping, 2023. "Land Use/Cover Change Prediction Based on a New Hybrid Logistic-Multicriteria Evaluation-Cellular Automata-Markov Model Taking Hefei, China as an Example," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-27, October.
    11. Rupak Goswami & Riya Roy & Dipjyoti Gangopadhyay & Poulami Sen & Kalyan Roy & Sukamal Sarkar & Sanchayeeta Misra & Krishnendu Ray & Marta Monjardino & Mohammed Mainuddin, 2024. "Understanding Resource Recycling and Land Management to Upscale Zero-Tillage Potato Cultivation in the Coastal Indian Sundarbans," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-23, January.
    12. Sujarwo & Aditya Nugraha Putra & Raden Arief Setyawan & Heitor Mancini Teixeira & Uma Khumairoh, 2022. "Forecasting Rice Status for a Food Crisis Early Warning System Based on Satellite Imagery and Cellular Automata in Malang, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-14, July.
    13. Haile Belay & Assefa M. Melesse & Getachew Tegegne, 2024. "Scenario-Based Land Use and Land Cover Change Detection and Prediction Using the Cellular Automata–Markov Model in the Gumara Watershed, Upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-34, March.
    14. René Ulloa-Espíndola & Susana Martín-Fernández, 2021. "Simulation and Analysis of Land Use Changes Applying Cellular Automata in the South of Quito and the Machachi Valley, Province of Pichincha, Ecuador," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-25, August.
    15. Raquel Faria de Deus & José António Tenedório & Denise Pumain & Jorge Rocha & Margarida Pereira, 2023. "100 Years of Land-Use and Land-Cover Data: What Has Been the Effect of Spatial Planning in Coastal Land-Use and Land-Cover Change?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, May.
    16. Shanqing Huang & Huimin Wang & Yejun Xu & Jingwen She & Jing Huang, 2021. "Key Disaster-Causing Factors Chains on Urban Flood Risk Based on Bayesian Network," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-21, February.
    17. Parviz Azizi & Ali Soltani & Farokh Bagheri & Shahrzad Sharifi & Mehdi Mikaeili, 2022. "An Integrated Modelling Approach to Urban Growth and Land Use/Cover Change," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-26, October.
    18. Motuma Shiferaw Regasa & Michael Nones, 2022. "Past and Future Land Use/Land Cover Changes in the Ethiopian Fincha Sub-Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, August.
    19. Bhatia, Samarth Y. & Gadiya, Kirtesh & Patil, Gopal R. & Krishna Mohan, Buddhiraju, 2024. "Thresholding-based cellular automata for transportation network derived future urban growth patterns in a peri-urban area," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 40-55.
    20. Denis Krivoguz & Sergei G. Chernyi & Elena Zinchenko & Artem Silkin & Anton Zinchenko, 2023. "Using Landsat-5 for Accurate Historical LULC Classification: A Comparison of Machine Learning Models," Data, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-17, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:5:p:979-:d:1136211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.