IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i1p261-d1037415.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantitative Morphometric 3D Terrain Analysis of Japan Using Scripts of GMT and R

Author

Listed:
  • Polina Lemenkova

    (Laboratory of Image Synthesis and Analysis (LISA), École Polytechnique de Bruxelles (Brussels Faculty of Engineering), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Building L, Campus du Solbosch, ULB—LISA CP165/57, Avenue F. D. Roosevelt 50, 1050 Brussels, Belgium)

  • Olivier Debeir

    (Laboratory of Image Synthesis and Analysis (LISA), École Polytechnique de Bruxelles (Brussels Faculty of Engineering), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Building L, Campus du Solbosch, ULB—LISA CP165/57, Avenue F. D. Roosevelt 50, 1050 Brussels, Belgium)

Abstract

In this paper, we describe two related scripting methods of cartographic data processing and visualization that provide 2D and 3D mapping of Japan with different algorithm complexity. The first algorithm utilizes Generic Mapping Toolset (GMT), which is known as an advanced console-based program for spatial data processing. The modules of GMT combine the functionality of scripting with the aspects of geoinformatics, which is especially effective for the rapid analysis of large geospatial datasets, multi-format data processing, and mapping in 2D and 3D modes. The second algorithm presents the use of the R programming language for cartographic visualization and spatial analysis. This R method utilizes the packages ‘tmap’, ‘raster’, ‘maps’, and ‘mapdata’ to model the morphometric elements of the Japanese archipelago, such as slope, aspect, hillshade and elevation. The general purpose graphical package ‘ggplot2’ of R was used for mapping the prefectures of Japan. The two scripting approaches demonstrated an established correspondence between the programming languages and cartography determined with the use of scripts for data processing. They outperform several well-known and state-of-the-art GIS methods for mapping due to their high automation of data processing. Cartography has largely reflected recent advances in data science, the rapid development of scripting languages, and transfer in the approaches of data processing. This extends to the shift from the traditional GIS to programming languages. As a response to these new challenges, we demonstrated in this paper the advantages of using scripts in mapping, which consist of repeatability and the flexible applicability of scripts in similar works.

Suggested Citation

  • Polina Lemenkova & Olivier Debeir, 2023. "Quantitative Morphometric 3D Terrain Analysis of Japan Using Scripts of GMT and R," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-29, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:1:p:261-:d:1037415
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/1/261/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/1/261/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hanaoka, Kazumasa & Nakaya, Tomoki & Yano, Keiji & Inoue, Shigeru, 2014. "Network-based spatial interpolation of commuting trajectories: application of a university commuting management project in Kyoto, Japan," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 274-281.
    2. Nakayama, Tadanobu & Osako, Masahiro, 2023. "Development of a process-based eco-hydrology model for evaluating the spatio-temporal dynamics of macro- and micro-plastics for the whole of Japan," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 476(C).
    3. Yuji Hara & Shinji Oki & Yoshiyuki Uchiyama & Kyuichi Ito & Yuto Tani & Asako Naito & Yuki Sampei, 2021. "Plant Diversity in the Dynamic Mosaic Landscape of an Agricultural Heritage System: The Minabe-Tanabe Ume System," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, May.
    4. Keiko Sasaki & Stefan Hotes & Tomohiro Ichinose & Tomoko Doko & Volkmar Wolters, 2021. "Hotspots of Agricultural Ecosystem Services and Farmland Biodiversity Overlap with Areas at Risk of Land Abandonment in Japan," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, October.
    5. Sasai, Takahiro & Nakai, Saori & Setoyama, Yuko & Ono, Keisuke & Kato, Soushi & Mano, Masayoshi & Murakami, Kazutaka & Miyata, Akira & Saigusa, Nobuko & Nemani, Ramakrishna R. & Nasahara, Kenlo N., 2012. "Analysis of the spatial variation in the net ecosystem production of rice paddy fields using the diagnostic biosphere model, BEAMS," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 175-189.
    6. Polina Lemenkova & Olivier Debeir, 2022. "R Libraries for Remote Sensing Data Classification by k-means Clustering and NDVI Computation in Congo River Basin, DRC," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/352357, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    7. Yoshihiko Kariya, 2002. "Geomorphic processes at a snowpatch hollow on Gassan volcano, northern Japan," Permafrost and Periglacial Processes, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(2), pages 107-116, April.
    8. Polina Lemenkova & Olivier Debeir, 2022. "Seismotectonics of Shallow-Focus Earthquakes in Venezuela with Links to Gravity Anomalies and Geologic Heterogeneity Mapped by a GMT Scripting Language," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-21, November.
    9. Shinji Otani & Yasunori Kurosaki & Youichi Kurozawa & Masato Shinoda, 2017. "Dust Storms from Degraded Drylands of Asia: Dynamics and Health Impacts," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-5, November.
    10. Minseo Kim & Christoph D. D. Rupprecht & Katsunori Furuya, 2018. "Residents’ Perception of Informal Green Space—A Case Study of Ichikawa City, Japan," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-20, September.
    11. Kikuko Shoyama, 2021. "Assessment of Land-Use Scenarios at a National Scale Using Intensity Analysis and Figure of Merit Components," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-13, April.
    12. Polina Lemenkova, 2022. "Handling Dataset with Geophysical and Geological Variables on the Bolivian Andes by the GMT Scripts," Data, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-18, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Richard Smardon, 2020. "Thomas Panagopoulos. Landscape urbanism and green infrastructure," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 10(2), pages 208-209, June.
    2. Francesco Piras & Beatrice Fiore & Antonio Santoro, 2022. "Small Cultural Forests: Landscape Role and Ecosystem Services in a Japanese Cultural Landscape," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, September.
    3. Enrico Pomatto & Marco Devecchi & Federica Larcher, 2022. "Coevolution between Terraced Landscapes and Rural Communities: An Integrated Approach Using Expert-Based Assessment and Evaluation of Winegrowers’ Perceptions (Northwest Piedmont, Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-27, July.
    4. Yuji Hara & Chizuko Hirai & Yuki Sampei, 2022. "Mapping Uncounted Anthropogenic Fill Flows: Environmental Impact and Mitigation," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, November.
    5. Walter Dachaga & Walter Timo de Vries, 2021. "Land Tenure Security and Health Nexus: A Conceptual Framework for Navigating the Connections between Land Tenure Security and Health," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-21, March.
    6. Ning Geng & Xiaoqing Zheng & Xibing Han & Xiaonan Li, 2024. "Towards Sustainable Development: The Impact of Agricultural Productive Services on China’s Low-Carbon Agricultural Transformation," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-25, June.
    7. Polina Lemenkova & Olivier Debeir, 2022. "R Libraries for Remote Sensing Data Classification by k-means Clustering and NDVI Computation in Congo River Basin, DRC," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/352357, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    8. Shi, Yusheng & Sasai, Takahiro & Yamaguchi, Yasushi, 2014. "Spatio-temporal evaluation of carbon emissions from biomass burning in Southeast Asia during the period 2001–2010," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 272(C), pages 98-115.
    9. Haruhiko Iba & Apichaya Lilavanichakul, 2023. "Farm Business Model on Smart Farming Technology for Sustainable Farmland in Hilly and Mountainous Areas of Japan," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, March.
    10. Xue Wang, 2022. "Changes in Cultivated Land Loss and Landscape Fragmentation in China from 2000 to 2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, May.
    11. Li-Yan Wang & Yi Xiao & En-Ming Rao & Ling Jiang & Yang Xiao & Zhi-Yun Ouyang, 2018. "An Assessment of the Impact of Urbanization on Soil Erosion in Inner Mongolia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-13, March.
    12. Nakayama, Tadanobu & Osako, Masahiro, 2024. "Plastic trade-off: Impact of export and import of waste plastic on plastic dynamics in Asian region," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 489(C).
    13. Huang, Duan & Chi, Hong & Xin, Fengfei & Miyata, Akira & Kang, Minseok & Liu, Kaiwen & Li, Rendong & Dang, Haishan & Qin, Yuanwei & Xiao, Xiangming, 2021. "Improved estimation of gross primary production of paddy rice cropland with changing model parameters over phenological transitions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 445(C).
    14. Yiming Liu & Xiangxiang Pan & Qing Liu & Guicai Li, 2023. "Establishing a Reliable Assessment of the Green View Index Based on Image Classification Techniques, Estimation, and a Hypothesis Testing Route," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, May.
    15. Martina Bianca Fuhrmann-Aoyagi & Kenji Miura & Kazuo Watanabe, 2024. "Sustainability in Japan’s Agriculture: An Analysis of Current Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-26, January.
    16. Yun Hye Hwang & Ivan Kurniawan Nasution & Deepika Amonkar & Amy Hahs, 2020. "Urban Green Space Distribution Related to Land Values in Fast-Growing Megacities, Mumbai and Jakarta–Unexploited Opportunities to Increase Access to Greenery for the Poor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-17, June.
    17. Duy Thong Ta & Katsunori Furuya, 2022. "Google Street View and Machine Learning—Useful Tools for a Street-Level Remote Survey: A Case Study in Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam and Ichikawa, Japan," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, December.
    18. Emmanuel Okiria & Muhamad Khoiru Zaki & Keigo Noda, 2021. "A Review of Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) in Agricultural Water: Are PES from the Operation of Agricultural Water Control Structures Ubiquitous?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-12, November.
    19. Rina Nuryati & Lies Sulistyowati & Trisna Insan Noor & Iwan Setiawan, 2024. "Innovation for development of sustainable integrated plantation polyculture on dry land: Using Structural Equation Modelling," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 70(6), pages 291-308.
    20. Zhongjian Mei & Cheng Li & Jie Zhao & Zixuan Li & Kaiyi Chen & Xin Huang & Zhiyue Zhao, 2024. "The Temporal and Spatial Evolution Characteristics and Driving Factors of Ecosystem Service Bundles in Anhui Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:1:p:261-:d:1037415. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.