IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i2p596-d1316213.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability in Japan’s Agriculture: An Analysis of Current Approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Martina Bianca Fuhrmann-Aoyagi

    (Doctoral Program in Biology, Graduate School of Science and Technology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8572, Japan)

  • Kenji Miura

    (Tsukuba-Plant Innovation Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8572, Japan)

  • Kazuo Watanabe

    (Tsukuba-Plant Innovation Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8572, Japan)

Abstract

Sustainable agriculture has gained prominence as a response to global concerns, such as climate change, population growth, and improving the quality of life. In this context, Japan presents specific characteristics regarding land, economy, and population; however, studies related to sustainable agricultural practices and government measures remain insufficient. To evaluate the state of Japan’s sustainable agriculture, this paper presents a comprehensive literature review. In this paper, a bibliographic review was carried out, including articles, books, and governmental data, to contextualize the current state of agriculture in Japan and demonstrate that sustainable agriculture is being applied and encouraged in Japan. According to the research, in general, agriculture in Japan has been suffering over the years due to population decline and an aging population, and fewer young people are interested in agriculture. However, when it comes to sustainability, the country, government, and farmers have adopted several measures to improve aspects such as decreasing herbicide and pesticide use, payment for environmentally friendly farmers, and promoting education about good agricultural practices. This study illuminates the importance of Japan’s efforts to advance sustainable agriculture, potentially offering insights that could contribute to the broader global discourse on sustainable food production. Although Japan presents distinct characteristics, certain patterns observed in its approach may have relevance in similar contexts in other countries. The policies implemented in Japan provide data for comparative studies that aim to assess their adaptability and effectiveness in different global contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Martina Bianca Fuhrmann-Aoyagi & Kenji Miura & Kazuo Watanabe, 2024. "Sustainability in Japan’s Agriculture: An Analysis of Current Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-26, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:596-:d:1316213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/2/596/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/2/596/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Béné, Christophe & Oosterveer, Peter & Lamotte, Lea & Brouwer, Inge D. & de Haan, Stef & Prager, Steve D. & Talsma, Elise F. & Khoury, Colin K., 2019. "When food systems meet sustainability – Current narratives and implications for actions," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 116-130.
    2. Riccardo Torelli, 2020. "Sustainability, responsibility and ethics: different concepts for a single path," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 17(5), pages 719-739, July.
    3. Keiko Sasaki & Stefan Hotes & Tomohiro Ichinose & Tomoko Doko & Volkmar Wolters, 2021. "Hotspots of Agricultural Ecosystem Services and Farmland Biodiversity Overlap with Areas at Risk of Land Abandonment in Japan," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, October.
    4. Verena Seufert & Navin Ramankutty & Jonathan A. Foley, 2012. "Comparing the yields of organic and conventional agriculture," Nature, Nature, vol. 485(7397), pages 229-232, May.
    5. Sheryl Rose C. Reyes & Aya Miyazaki & Evonne Yiu & Osamu Saito, 2020. "Enhancing Sustainability in Traditional Agriculture: Indicators for Monitoring the Conservation of Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS) in Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-28, July.
    6. Kazumi Kondoh, 2015. "The alternative food movement in Japan: Challenges, limits, and resilience of the teikei system," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 32(1), pages 143-153, March.
    7. Torelli, Riccardo, 2020. "Sustainability, Responsibility and Ethics: Different Concepts for a Single Path," OSF Preprints hb92c, Center for Open Science.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abdel-Aziz Ahmad Sharabati & Shafig Al-Haddad & Razan Abu Naba & Diana Hijazat & Ali Abdallah Alalwan & Ra’ed Masa’deh, 2023. "How Consumers’ Consciousness Moderates the Corporate Social Responsibility Effect on Apparel Industry Brand Image," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Aleksandra Kowalska & Monika Ratajczyk & Louise Manning & Milena Bieniek & Radosław Mącik, 2021. "“Young and Green” a Study of Consumers’ Perceptions and Reported Purchasing Behaviour towards Organic Food in Poland and the United Kingdom," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-23, November.
    3. Agung Satyadini & Ligang Song, 2023. "Modern entrepreneurship and the ‘doughnut’: productive or destructive?," Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, The Crawford School, The Australian National University, vol. 37(2), pages 119-141, November.
    4. Matthew J. Spaniol & Evita Danilova-Jensen & Martin Nielsen & Carl Gyldenkærne Rosdahl & Clara Jasmin Schmidt, 2024. "Defining Greenwashing: A Concept Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-17, October.
    5. Zdena Krnáčová & Pavol Kenderessy & Zuzana Baránková & Mária Barančoková & Martin Labuda, 2023. "Multifunctional Use of Agricultural Land with Support for Selected Ecosystem Services in the Territory Protected Water Management Area Žitný Ostrov," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Jie Zhao & Ji Chen & Damien Beillouin & Hans Lambers & Yadong Yang & Pete Smith & Zhaohai Zeng & Jørgen E. Olesen & Huadong Zang, 2022. "Global systematic review with meta-analysis reveals yield advantage of legume-based rotations and its drivers," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    7. Movedi, Ermes & Valiante, Daniele & Colosio, Alessandro & Corengia, Luca & Cossa, Stefano & Confalonieri, Roberto, 2022. "A new approach for modeling crop-weed interaction targeting management support in operational contexts: A case study on the rice weeds barnyardgrass and red rice," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 463(C).
    8. Wang, Linlin & Li, Qiang & Coulter, Jeffrey A. & Xie, Junhong & Luo, Zhuzhu & Zhang, Renzhi & Deng, Xiping & Li, Linglin, 2020. "Winter wheat yield and water use efficiency response to organic fertilization in northern China: A meta-analysis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    9. Lucia Mancini, 2013. "Conventional, Organic and Polycultural Farming Practices: Material Intensity of Italian Crops and Foodstuffs," Resources, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-23, December.
    10. Sittichok Plaiphum & Roengchai Tansuchat, 2023. "Cultural Capital of Sea Salt Farming in Ban Laem District of Phetchaburi Province as per the Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-27, August.
    11. Daniel P. Roberts & Autar K. Mattoo, 2018. "Sustainable Agriculture—Enhancing Environmental Benefits, Food Nutritional Quality and Building Crop Resilience to Abiotic and Biotic Stresses," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-24, January.
    12. Beulah Pretorius & Jane Ambuko & Effie Papargyropoulou & Hettie C. Schönfeldt, 2021. "Guiding Nutritious Food Choices and Diets along Food Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-19, August.
    13. Atanu Mukherjee & Emmanuel C. Omondi & Paul R. Hepperly & Rita Seidel & Wade P. Heller, 2020. "Impacts of Organic and Conventional Management on the Nutritional Level of Vegetables," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-25, October.
    14. Seck, Abdoulaye & Thiam, Djiby Racine, 2022. "Understanding consumer attitudes to and valuation of organic food in Sub-Saharan Africa: A double-bound contingent method applied in Dakar, Senegal," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 17(1), March.
    15. Schindele, Stephan & Trommsdorff, Maximilian & Schlaak, Albert & Obergfell, Tabea & Bopp, Georg & Reise, Christian & Braun, Christian & Weselek, Axel & Bauerle, Andrea & Högy, Petra & Goetzberger, Ado, 2020. "Implementation of agrophotovoltaics: Techno-economic analysis of the price-performance ratio and its policy implications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    16. Vogel, Everton & Martinelli, Gabrielli & Artuzo, Felipe Dalzotto, 2021. "Environmental and economic performance of paddy field-based crop-livestock systems in Southern Brazil," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    17. Sadowski, Arkadiusz & Wojcieszak-Zbierska, Monika Małgorzata & Zmyślona, Jagoda, 2024. "Agricultural production in the least developed countries and its impact on emission of greenhouse gases – An energy approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    18. Kalaitzandonakes, Nicholas & Lusk, Jayson & Magnier, Alexandre, 2018. "The price of non-genetically modified (non-GM) food," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 38-50.
    19. Ronja Teschner & Jessica Ruppen & Basil Bornemann & Rony Emmenegger & Lucía Aguirre Sánchez, 2021. "Mapping Sustainable Diets: A Comparison of Sustainability References in Dietary Guidelines of Swiss Food Governance Actors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, November.
    20. Janet MacFall & Joanna Lelekacs & Todd LeVasseur & Steve Moore & Jennifer Walker, 2015. "Toward resilient food systems through increased agricultural diversity and local sourcing in the Carolinas," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 5(4), pages 608-622, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:596-:d:1316213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.