IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i11p1878-d950700.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Potential of Vegetation Carbon Uptake from Optimal Land Management in the Greater Guangzhou Area

Author

Listed:
  • Zongyao Sha

    (Key Laboratory of Natural Resources Monitoring in Tropical and Subtropical area of South China, Ministry of Natural Resources, Guangzhou 510631, China
    School of Remote Sensing and Information Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Dai Qiu

    (School of Remote Sensing and Information Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Husheng Fang

    (School of Remote Sensing and Information Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Yichun Xie

    (Department of Geography and Geology, Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, MI 48197, USA)

  • Jiangguang Tu

    (School of Remote Sensing and Information Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Xicheng Tan

    (School of Remote Sensing and Information Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Xiaolei Li

    (School of Remote Sensing and Information Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Jiangping Chen

    (School of Remote Sensing and Information Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China)

Abstract

Rapid urbanization has threatened sustainable urban development in many cities across the globe, causing green space loss and vegetation cover degradation which reduce carbon sequestration. Optimal land management practices (LMPs) in an urban context are known as ways capable of promoting urban vegetation growth and contributing to carbon sequestration. Due to variations of physical, biological, and social structures in urban areas, policymakers often lack relevant information to decide and implement site-specific LMPs. Here we try to extract the areas in need of the optimal LMPs, identify location-dependent optimal LMPs, and assess how much more carbon can be captured by applying a combination of segmenting homogeneous urban environments and neighborhood-based analysis. As one of the most developed cities in China, the greater Guangzhou area (GGA) was selected as a case study. We found that the carbon uptake from the urban vegetation in GGA could be improved on average by 185 gC m −2 yr −1 in flux (or 1.3 TgC yr −1 in total) with optimal LMPs, equivalent to a ~30% increase considering the current level of 662 gC m −2 yr −1 in flux (4.4 TgC yr −1 in total). The carbon uptake potential was found to differ considerably across locations and among different ecosystem types, highlighting spatially varied priorities for implementing optimal LMPs over the space. This study reveals the usefulness of the model in assessing carbon uptake potential from optimal LMPs and emphasizes that future urban planning may consider the importance of optimal LMPs in enhancing vegetation carbon uptake in urban planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Zongyao Sha & Dai Qiu & Husheng Fang & Yichun Xie & Jiangguang Tu & Xicheng Tan & Xiaolei Li & Jiangping Chen, 2022. "Assessing the Potential of Vegetation Carbon Uptake from Optimal Land Management in the Greater Guangzhou Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:11:p:1878-:d:950700
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/11/1878/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/11/1878/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ying Wang & Xiangmei Li & Jiangfeng Li & Zhengdong Huang & Renbin Xiao, 2018. "Impact of Rapid Urbanization on Vulnerability of Land System from Complex Networks View: A Methodological Approach," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-18, May.
    2. Francesca Peroni & Guglielmo Pristeri & Daniele Codato & Salvatore Eugenio Pappalardo & Massimo De Marchi, 2019. "Biotope Area Factor: An Ecological Urban Index to Geovisualize Soil Sealing in Padua, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Ming Li & Guojun Zhang & Ying Liu & Yongwang Cao & Chunshan Zhou, 2019. "Determinants of Urban Expansion and Spatial Heterogeneity in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-19, October.
    4. Jones, Peter G. & Thornton, Philip K., 2015. "Representative soil profiles for the Harmonized World Soil Database at different spatial resolutions for agricultural modelling applications," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 93-99.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dunnett, A. & Shirsath, P.B. & Aggarwal, P.K. & Thornton, P. & Joshi, P.K. & Pal, B.D. & Khatri-Chhetri, A. & Ghosh, J., 2018. "Multi-objective land use allocation modelling for prioritizing climate-smart agricultural interventions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 381(C), pages 23-35.
    2. Xiaoguang Wei & Shibin Gao & Tao Huang & Tao Wang & Wenli Fan, 2019. "Identification of Two Vulnerability Features: A New Framework for Electrical Networks Based on the Load Redistribution Mechanism of Complex Networks," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-14, January.
    3. Parisa Paymard & Mohammad Bannayan & Reza Sadrabadi Haghighi, 2018. "Analysis of the climate change effect on wheat production systems and investigate the potential of management strategies," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 91(3), pages 1237-1255, April.
    4. Tao Yu & Anming Bao & Wenqiang Xu & Hao Guo & Liangliang Jiang & Guoxiong Zheng & Ye Yuan & Vincent NZABARINDA, 2019. "Exploring Variability in Landscape Ecological Risk and Quantifying Its Driving Factors in the Amu Darya Delta," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-21, December.
    5. Amit Kumar Basukala & Livia Rasche, 2022. "Model-Based Yield Gap Assessment in Nepal’s Diverse Agricultural Landscape," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-25, August.
    6. Fraga, Helder & Santos, João A., 2018. "Vineyard mulching as a climate change adaptation measure: Future simulations for Alentejo, Portugal," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 107-115.
    7. Nimra Iqbal & Marvin Ravan & Ali Jamshed & Joern Birkmann & Giorgos Somarakis & Zina Mitraka & Nektarios Chrysoulakis, 2022. "Linkages between Typologies of Existing Urban Development Patterns and Human Vulnerability to Heat Stress in Lahore," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-26, August.
    8. Dingrao Feng & Wenkai Bao & Meichen Fu & Min Zhang & Yiyu Sun, 2021. "Current and Future Land Use Characters of a National Central City in Eco-Fragile Region—A Case Study in Xi’an City Based on FLUS Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-25, March.
    9. Zunfu Lv & Yan Zhu & Xiaojun Liu & Hongbao Ye & Yongchao Tian & Feifei Li, 2018. "Climate change impacts on regional rice production in China," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 147(3), pages 523-537, April.
    10. Fraga, H. & García de Cortázar Atauri, I. & Santos, J.A, 2018. "Viticultural irrigation demands under climate change scenarios in Portugal," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 66-74.
    11. Anna Codemo & Angelica Pianegonda & Marco Ciolli & Sara Favargiotti & Rossano Albatici, 2022. "Mapping Pervious Surfaces and Canopy Cover Using High-Resolution Airborne Imagery and Digital Elevation Models to Support Urban Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, May.
    12. Kamila Pawłowska & Bartosz Jawecki, 2021. "The Determination of Priority Areas for the Construction of Green Roofs with Use of the Urban Area Valorisation Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-24, November.
    13. Xinhang Tang & Shuai Shao & Jia Cui, 2024. "Spatial-Temporal Evolution and Environmental Regulation Effects of Carbon Emissions in Shrinking and Growing Cities: Empirical Evidence from 272 Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-21, August.
    14. Yiting Zuo & Jie Cheng & Meichen Fu, 2022. "Analysis of Land Use Change and the Role of Policy Dimensions in Ecologically Complex Areas: A Case Study in Chongqing," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-27, April.
    15. Global Commission on Adaptation, 2019. "Adapt Now," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 32362.
    16. Yang, Chenyao & Fraga, Helder & Ieperen, Wim Van & Santos, João Andrade, 2017. "Assessment of irrigated maize yield response to climate change scenarios in Portugal," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 178-190.
    17. Tingley-Holyoak & Pisaniello, John & Buss, Peter & Wiersma, Ben, 2019. "Pr - Development Of A Cost-Effective Water Productivity Accounting Tool For Agriculture," 22nd Congress, Tasmania, Australia, March 3-8, 2019 345907, International Farm Management Association.
    18. Henderson, Benjamin & Cacho, Oscar & Thornton, Philip & van Wijk, Mark & Herrero, Mario, 2018. "The economic potential of residue management and fertilizer use to address climate change impacts on mixed smallholder farmers in Burkina Faso," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 195-205.
    19. Zinhle Mashaba-Munghemezulu & George Johannes Chirima & Cilence Munghemezulu, 2021. "Modeling the Spatial Distribution of Soil Nitrogen Content at Smallholder Maize Farms Using Machine Learning Regression and Sentinel-2 Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, October.
    20. Fangqu Niu & Lan Wang & Wei Sun, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Characteristics and Determinants of Rural Construction Land in China’s Developed Areas: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-19, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:11:p:1878-:d:950700. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.