IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i11p1110-d660616.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decoding Rural Space Reconstruction Using an Actor-Network Methodological Approach: A Case Study from the Yangtze River Delta, China

Author

Listed:
  • Haoyu Liu

    (College of Public Administration (College of Land Management), Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China)

  • Dalai Weng

    (College of Public Administration (College of Land Management), Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China)

  • Hongguang Liu

    (College of Public Administration (College of Land Management), Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China)

Abstract

Using actor-network theory (ANT), this paper explores the process and mechanisms of rural space reconstruction in China in the post-urbanization era. In the context of urban–rural integration development in China, villages have become diversified. They are not only the living spaces of villagers, but they are also consumption spaces of urban residents. Through a case study of a typical village in the Yangtze River Delta, this study highlights that the actor-network of rural spatial reconstruction includes heterogeneous actors, such as the village committee, villagers, governments, tourism enterprises, makers, housing, and landscape—among which the Lishui Government is the key actor. Therefore, this paper argues that China’s rural space reconstruction is greatly dependent on external resources such as government policy support or enterprise investment. In the future, promoting public participation will be necessary to realize villages’ endogenous transformation and development.

Suggested Citation

  • Haoyu Liu & Dalai Weng & Hongguang Liu, 2021. "Decoding Rural Space Reconstruction Using an Actor-Network Methodological Approach: A Case Study from the Yangtze River Delta, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:11:p:1110-:d:660616
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/11/1110/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/11/1110/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arnaboldi, Michela & Spiller, Nicola, 2011. "Actor-network theory and stakeholder collaboration: The case of Cultural Districts," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 641-654.
    2. Beard, Lynn & Scarles, Caroline & Tribe, John, 2016. "Mess and method: Using ANT in tourism research," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 97-110.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ledi Wen & Lei Sima, 2022. "Analysis of Outdoor Activity Space-Use Preferences in Rural Communities: An Example from Puxiu and Yuanyi Village in Shanghai," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, August.
    2. Jing Wang & Yaping Zhang & Guofu Yang & Yinyi Wang & Xiaomeng Cheng & Bin Xu, 2023. "Spatial Reconstruction of Traditional Villages towards Synergistic Development in the Fuchun River Basin Based on the Gravity Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-24, May.
    3. Sebastian Țoc & Filip Mihai Alexandrescu, 2022. "Post-Coal Fantasies: An Actor-Network Theory-Inspired Critique of Post-Coal Development Strategies in the Jiu Valley, Romania," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. van der Duim, René & Ren, Carina & Jóhannesson, Gunnar Thór, 2017. "ANT: A decade of interfering with tourism," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 139-149.
    2. Guorong Tang & Jinhe Zhang & Yu Zhang, 2017. "Livestock Animal Displacement on Rural Tourism Destinations: Placing Livestock's “Pest” Role in the Background," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-20, July.
    3. Hummel, John & van der Duim, Rene, 2016. "SNV's modes of ordering: Organizing tourism as development practice," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 312-322.
    4. Sébastien Darchen, 2017. "Regeneration and networks in the Arts District (Los Angeles): Rethinking governance models in the production of urbanity," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(15), pages 3615-3635, November.
    5. Camisón, César & Forés, Beatriz, 2015. "Is tourism firm competitiveness driven by different internal or external specific factors?: New empirical evidence from Spain," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 477-499.
    6. Wenwu Du & Sofia M Penabaz-Wiley & Isami Kinoshita, 2019. "Relationships between land use changes, stakeholders, and national scenic area administrations: A case study of Mount Jinfo and its surroundings in China," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 37(8), pages 1507-1530, December.
    7. Dibb, Sally & Ball, Kirstie & Canhoto, Ana & Daniel, Elizabeth M. & Meadows, Maureen & Spiller, Keith, 2014. "Taking responsibility for border security: Commercial interests in the face of e-borders," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 50-61.
    8. Waqas Ahmed & Sharafat Ali & Muhammad Asghar & Alisher Ismailov, 2023. "Assessment and Analysis of the Complexities in Sustainability of the Transport Projects Under CPEC: A Grounded Theory Approach," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, November.
    9. Blanca García Henche & Erica Salvaj & Pedro Cuesta-Valiño, 2020. "A Sustainable Management Model for Cultural Creative Tourism Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-21, November.
    10. Stinson, Michela J. & Hurst, Chris E. & Grimwood, Bryan S.R., 2022. "Tracing the materiality of reconciliation in tourism," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    11. Stinson, Michela J. & Grimwood, Bryan S.R., 2019. "On actor-network theory and anxiety in tourism research," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 141-143.
    12. Anna Moretti & Michele Tamma, 2014. "Making cultural tourism networks work - the role of collective actors," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(4), pages 63-83.
    13. Farsari, Ioanna, 2018. "A structural approach to social representations of destination collaboration in Idre, Sweden," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 1-12.
    14. Sainaghi, Ruggero & Baggio, Rodolfo, 2017. "Complexity traits and dynamics of tourism destinations," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 368-382.
    15. Marion, Élodie & Mann-Feder, Varda, 2020. "Supporting the educational attainment of youth in residential care: From issues to controversies," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    16. Beard, Lynn & Scarles, Caroline & Tribe, John, 2016. "Mess and method: Using ANT in tourism research," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 97-110.
    17. Junsheng Liu & Yaofeng Ma, 2017. "The Perceptual Differences among Stakeholders in the Tourism Supply of Xi’an City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-21, February.
    18. Dedeke, Adenekan (Nick), 2017. "Creating sustainable tourism ventures in protected areas: An actor-network theory analysis," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 161-172.
    19. Wondirad, Amare & Ewnetu, Biruk, 2019. "Community participation in tourism development as a tool to foster sustainable land and resource use practices in a national park milieu," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    20. Jørgensen, Matias Thuen, 2017. "Reframing tourism distribution - Activity Theory and Actor-Network Theory," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 312-321.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:11:p:1110-:d:660616. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.