IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v37y2019i8p1507-1530.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relationships between land use changes, stakeholders, and national scenic area administrations: A case study of Mount Jinfo and its surroundings in China

Author

Listed:
  • Wenwu Du

    (Southwest University, China; Chiba University, Japan)

  • Sofia M Penabaz-Wiley
  • Isami Kinoshita

Abstract

Rapid land use change in the surroundings of protected areas is rampant worldwide. This process is poorly understood and raises questions on how it happens, who shapes it, and the role of administration. To address these questions, we applied a case study in Jinfo National Scenic Area, China, and examined the relationships between land use change, concerned stakeholders, and the administration. Our study revealed that tourism-oriented commercial development and residential relocate were the main reasons for land use change and that the scenic area authorities, tourism enterprises, and locals were pivotal stakeholders in this process. In addition, we identified three authority types since the founding of Jinfo National Scenic Area. Evidence indicates that the conservation-oriented type and development-oriented type were less successful than the integration type in coordinating stakeholders and integrating the scenic area and its surroundings, and the development-oriented type has historically been most closely associated with damaging land use change. Further, we explored the causes for issues during the management of the Jinfo National Scenic Area included frequent administration changes, confusing plans and management goals, absence of a method for involving stakeholders, a lack of clear administrative authority, and a lack of an integrated national legal system. Our study highlights that it is critical to address these problems while aiming for a long-term balance of conservation and sustainable development in scenic areas and their surroundings.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenwu Du & Sofia M Penabaz-Wiley & Isami Kinoshita, 2019. "Relationships between land use changes, stakeholders, and national scenic area administrations: A case study of Mount Jinfo and its surroundings in China," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 37(8), pages 1507-1530, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:37:y:2019:i:8:p:1507-1530
    DOI: 10.1177/2399654419831708
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2399654419831708
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2399654419831708?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Palomo, Ignacio & Martín-López, Berta & Potschin, Marion & Haines-Young, Roy & Montes, Carlos, 2013. "National Parks, buffer zones and surrounding lands: Mapping ecosystem service flows," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 4(C), pages 104-116.
    2. Arnaboldi, Michela & Spiller, Nicola, 2011. "Actor-network theory and stakeholder collaboration: The case of Cultural Districts," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 641-654.
    3. Wenwu Du & Sofia M. Penabaz-Wiley & Anthony Murithi Njeru & Isami Kinoshita, 2015. "Models and Approaches for Integrating Protected Areas with Their Surroundings: A Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-27, June.
    4. Žiga Malek & Anna Scolobig & Dagmar Schröter, 2014. "Understanding Land Cover Changes in the Italian Alps and Romanian Carpathians Combining Remote Sensing and Stakeholder Interviews," Land, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-22, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yongcuomu Qu & Ziqiong Zhang & Yanchao Feng & Xiaorong Cui, 2021. "How Do Chinese National Scenic Areas Affect Tourism Economic Development? The Moderating Effect of Time-Limited Rectification," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-11, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Drakou, E.G. & Crossman, N.D. & Willemen, L. & Burkhard, B. & Palomo, I. & Maes, J. & Peedell, S., 2015. "A visualization and data-sharing tool for ecosystem service maps: Lessons learnt, challenges and the way forward," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 13(C), pages 134-140.
    2. Hummel, John & van der Duim, Rene, 2016. "SNV's modes of ordering: Organizing tourism as development practice," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 312-322.
    3. González-García, Alberto & Palomo, Ignacio & González, José A. & López, César A. & Montes, Carlos, 2020. "Quantifying spatial supply-demand mismatches in ecosystem services provides insights for land-use planning," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    4. Víctor García-Díez & Marina García-Llorente & José A. González, 2020. "Participatory Mapping of Cultural Ecosystem Services in Madrid: Insights for Landscape Planning," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-15, July.
    5. Carmen Schwartz & Mostafa Shaaban & Sonoko Dorothea Bellingrath-Kimura & Annette Piorr, 2021. "Participatory Mapping of Demand for Ecosystem Services in Agricultural Landscapes," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, November.
    6. Jennifer Hodbod & Emma Tebbs & Kristofer Chan & Shubhechchha Sharma, 2019. "Integrating Participatory Methods and Remote Sensing to Enhance Understanding of Ecosystem Service Dynamics Across Scales," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-30, August.
    7. Heagney, E.C. & Rose, J.M. & Ardeshiri, A. & Kovac, M., 2019. "The economic value of tourism and recreation across a large protected area network," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    8. Žiga Malek & Veronica Zumpano & Haydar Hussin, 2018. "Forest management and future changes to ecosystem services in the Romanian Carpathians," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 1275-1291, June.
    9. Brill, Gregg & Anderson, Pippin & O'Farrell, Patrick, 2017. "Urban national parks in the global South: Linking management perceptions, policies and practices to water-related ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(PB), pages 185-195.
    10. Cumming, Graeme S. & Maciejewski, Kristine, 2017. "Reconciling community ecology and ecosystem services: Cultural services and benefits from birds in South African National Parks," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(PB), pages 219-227.
    11. Farkas, Jenő Zsolt & Kovács, András Donát, 2021. "Nature conservation versus agriculture in the light of socio-economic changes over the last half-century–Case study from a Hungarian national park," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    12. Kulczyk, Sylwia & Woźniak, Edyta & Derek, Marta, 2018. "Landscape, facilities and visitors: An integrated model of recreational ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(PC), pages 491-501.
    13. Tianlin Zhai & Jing Wang & Ying Fang & Longyang Huang & Jingjing Liu & Chenchen Zhao, 2021. "Integrating Ecosystem Services Supply, Demand and Flow in Ecological Compensation: A Case Study of Carbon Sequestration Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    14. De Vos, A. & Cumming, G.S. & Roux, D.J., 2017. "The relevance of cross-scale connections and spatial interactions for ecosystem service delivery by protected areas: Insights from southern Africa," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(PB), pages 133-139.
    15. Karimi, Azadeh & Yazdandad, Hossein & Fagerholm, Nora, 2020. "Evaluating social perceptions of ecosystem services, biodiversity, and land management: Trade-offs, synergies and implications for landscape planning and management," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    16. van der Duim, René & Ren, Carina & Jóhannesson, Gunnar Thór, 2017. "ANT: A decade of interfering with tourism," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 139-149.
    17. Bernadetta Zawilińska & Patrycja Brańka & Karol Majewski & Marcin Semczuk, 2021. "National Parks—Areas of Economic Development or Stagnation? Evidence from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-24, October.
    18. Gallego, Aurea & Calafat, Consuelo & Segura, Marina & Quintanilla, Israel, 2019. "Land planning and risk assessment for livestock production based on an outranking approach and GIS," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 606-621.
    19. Bo Jiang & Yuanyuan Chen & Yang Bai & Xibao Xu, 2019. "Supply–Demand Coupling Mechanisms for Policy Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-8, October.
    20. Sébastien Darchen, 2017. "Regeneration and networks in the Arts District (Los Angeles): Rethinking governance models in the production of urbanity," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(15), pages 3615-3635, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:37:y:2019:i:8:p:1507-1530. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.