IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v17y2024i3p100-d1348064.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On Comparing and Assessing Robustness of Some Popular Non-Stationary BINAR(1) Models

Author

Listed:
  • Yuvraj Sunecher

    (Department of Accounting and Finance, University of Technology Mauritius, Pointe-Aux-Sables 11110, Mauritius)

  • Naushad Mamode Khan

    (Department of Economics and Statistics, University of Mauritius, Reduit 80835, Mauritius)

Abstract

Intra-day transactions of stocks from competing firms in the financial markets are known to exhibit significant volatility and over-dispersion. This paper proposes some bivariate integer-valued auto-regressive models of order 1 (BINAR(1)) that are useful to analyze such financial series. These models were constructed under both time-variant and time-invariant conditions to capture features such as over-dispersion and non-stationarity in time series of counts. However, the quest for the most robust BINAR(1) models is still on. This paper considers specifically the family of BINAR(1)s with a non-diagonal cross-correlation structure and with unpaired innovation series. These assumptions relax the number of parameters to be estimated. Simulation experiments are performed to assess both the consistency of the estimators and the robust behavior of the BINAR(1)s under mis-specified innovation distribution specifications. The proposed BINAR(1)s are applied to analyze the intra-day transaction series of AstraZeneca and Ericsson. Diagnostic measures such as the root mean square errors (RMSEs) and Akaike information criteria (AICs) are also considered. The paper concludes that the BINAR(1)s with negative binomial and COM–Poisson innovations are among the most suitable models to analyze over-dispersed intra-day transaction series of stocks.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuvraj Sunecher & Naushad Mamode Khan, 2024. "On Comparing and Assessing Robustness of Some Popular Non-Stationary BINAR(1) Models," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-13, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:3:p:100-:d:1348064
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/3/100/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/3/100/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vandna Jowaheer, 2002. "Analysing longitudinal count data with overdispersion," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 89(2), pages 389-399, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brajendra C. Sutradhar & Vandna Jowaheer & R. Prabhakar Rao, 2016. "Semi-Parametric Models for Negative Binomial Panel Data," Sankhya A: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 78(2), pages 269-303, August.
    2. Yuvraj Sunecher & Naushad Mamode Khan & Miroslav M. Ristić & Vandna Jowaheer, 2019. "BINAR(1) negative binomial model for bivariate non-stationary time series with different over-dispersion indices," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 28(4), pages 625-653, December.
    3. Jowaheer, Vandna, 2006. "Model misspecification effects in clustered count data analysis," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 76(5), pages 470-478, March.
    4. Miroslav M. Ristić & Yuvraj Sunecher & Naushad Mamode Khan & Vandna Jowaheer, 2019. "A GQL-based inference in non-stationary BINMA(1) time series," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(3), pages 969-998, September.
    5. Brajendra C. Sutradhar, 2008. "On forecasting counts," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(2), pages 109-129.
    6. Dimitris Karlis & Naushad Mamode Khan & Yuvraj Sunecher, 2024. "The Negative Binomial INAR(1) Process under Different Thinning Processes: Can We Separate between the Different Models?," Stats, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-15, July.
    7. N. Mamode Khan & Y. Sunecher & V. Jowaheer & M. M. Ristic & M. Heenaye-Mamode Khan, 2019. "Investigating GQL-based inferential approaches for non-stationary BINAR(1) model under different quantum of over-dispersion with application," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 1275-1313, September.
    8. Christoph Jeßberger, 2011. "Multilateral Environmental Agreements up to 2050: Are They Sustainable Enough?," ifo Working Paper Series 98, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    9. Ye, Fei & Yue, Chen & Yang, Ying, 2013. "Modeling time-dependent overdispersion in longitudinal count data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 257-264.
    10. Sneddon, Gary & Sutradhar, Brajendra C., 2004. "On semiparametric familial-longitudinal models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 69(3), pages 369-379, September.
    11. Lee, Keunbaik & Joo, Yongsung, 2019. "Marginalized models for longitudinal count data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 47-58.
    12. Brajendra C. Sutradhar & Nan Zheng, 2018. "Inferences in Binary Dynamic Fixed Models in a Semi-parametric Setup," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 80(2), pages 263-291, November.
    13. Wan, Wai-Yin & Chan, Jennifer So-Kuen, 2011. "Bayesian analysis of robust Poisson geometric process model using heavy-tailed distributions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 687-702, January.
    14. Peter Hall & Hans‐Georg Müller & Fang Yao, 2008. "Modelling sparse generalized longitudinal observations with latent Gaussian processes," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(4), pages 703-723, September.
    15. Alwell J. Oyet & Brajendra C. Sutradhar, 2021. "Analyzing Unevenly Spaced Longitudinal Count Data," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 83(2), pages 342-373, November.
    16. Goncalves, M. Helena & Salome Cabral, M. & Carme Ruiz de Villa, Maria & Escrich, Eduardo & Solanas, Montse, 2007. "Likelihood approach for count data in longitudinal experiments," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(12), pages 6511-6520, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:3:p:100-:d:1348064. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.