IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v14y2021i5p192-d541212.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preference between Individual Products and Bundles: Effects of Complementary, Price, and Discount Level in Portugal

Author

Listed:
  • Paulo Martins

    (Faculty of Economics and Management, Universidade Lusíada, Norte, 4369-006 Porto, Portugal)

  • Paula Rodrigues

    (Faculty of Economics and Management, Universidade Lusíada, Norte, 4369-006 Porto, Portugal)

  • Carlos Martins

    (Faculty of Economics and Management, Universidade Lusíada, Norte, 4369-006 Porto, Portugal)

  • Teresa Barros

    (CIICESI-ESTG, Politécnico do Porto, 4610-156 Felgueiras, Portugal
    International Research Institute for Economics and Management, Hong Kong, China)

  • Nelson Duarte

    (CIICESI-ESTG, Politécnico do Porto, 4610-156 Felgueiras, Portugal
    International Research Institute for Economics and Management, Hong Kong, China)

  • Rebecca Kechen Dong

    (International Research Institute for Economics and Management, Hong Kong, China
    School of Management, University of South Australia, Adelaide 5001, Australia)

  • Yiyi Liao

    (International Research Institute for Economics and Management, Hong Kong, China)

  • Ubaldo Comite

    (Department of Business Sciences, University Giustino Fortunato, 82100 Benevento, Italy)

  • Xiaoguang Yue

    (CIICESI-ESTG, Politécnico do Porto, 4610-156 Felgueiras, Portugal
    International Research Institute for Economics and Management, Hong Kong, China
    Department of Business Sciences, University Giustino Fortunato, 82100 Benevento, Italy
    Department of Computer Science and Engineering, School of Sciences, European University Cyprus, Nicosia 1516, Cyprus)

Abstract

This paper aims to (1) compare consumers’ preferences between individual products and bundles as well as (2) investigate some of the factors involved in bundle characteristics that may affect consumer’s preferences. Those factors are complementarity, price level, and discount level. An online survey developed by means of questionnaires were collected from the Portuguese population. Student’s t -tests were used to test the hypothesis formulated and to analyze the consumers’ preferences. The findings corroborate that in a scenario where the bundle does not offer any discounts, preference of individual products is higher. When a 20% discount is assigned to bundles, the overall preference for individual products is still superior. By offering a discount level of 45%, the overall preference for bundles becomes higher. The positive effect of complementarity bundles valuation is confirmed. This is the first approach to evaluate the preferences between bundles and individual products in the Portuguese market. The findings contribute to clarify the customer map within a Business Model Canvas. Furthermore, this paper analyzes the bundle complementarity and discount level effects simultaneously.

Suggested Citation

  • Paulo Martins & Paula Rodrigues & Carlos Martins & Teresa Barros & Nelson Duarte & Rebecca Kechen Dong & Yiyi Liao & Ubaldo Comite & Xiaoguang Yue, 2021. "Preference between Individual Products and Bundles: Effects of Complementary, Price, and Discount Level in Portugal," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-19, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:14:y:2021:i:5:p:192-:d:541212
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/14/5/192/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/14/5/192/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roland T. Rust & J. Jeffrey Inman & Jianmin Jia & Anthony Zahorik, 1999. "What You Know About Customer-Perceived Quality: The Role of Customer Expectation Distributions," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(1), pages 77-92.
    2. Dansby, Robert E & Conrad, Cecilia, 1984. "Commodity Bundling," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 74(2), pages 377-381, May.
    3. Kopczewski, Tomasz & Sobolewski, Maciej & Miernik, Ireneusz, 2018. "Bundling or unbundling? Integrated simulation model of optimal pricing strategies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 328-345.
    4. Yoram Kinberg & Ephraim F Sudit, 1979. "Country/Service Bundling in International Tourism: Criteria for the Selection of an Efficient Bundle Mix and Allocation of Joint Revenues," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 10(2), pages 51-62, June.
    5. Epstein, Leonardo D. & Inostroza-Quezada, Ignacio E. & Goodstein, Ronald C. & Choi, S. Chan, 2021. "Dynamic effects of store promotions on purchase conversion: Expanding technology applications with innovative analytics," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 279-289.
    6. Telser, L G, 1979. "A Theory of Monopoly of Complementary Goods," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 52(2), pages 211-230, April.
    7. Michael W. Lawless, 1991. "Commodity Bundling For Competitive Advantage: Strategic Implications," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(3), pages 267-280, May.
    8. Schmalensee, Richard, 1984. "Gaussian Demand and Commodity Bundling," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 57(1), pages 211-230, January.
    9. Harlam, Bari A. & Krishna, Aradhna & Lehmann, Donald R. & Mela, Carl, 1995. "Impact of bundle type, price framing and familiarity on purchase intention for the bundle," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 57-66, May.
    10. Goldberg, Stephen M & Green, Paul E & Wind, Yoram, 1984. "Conjoint Analysis of Price Premiums for Hotel Amenities," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 57(1), pages 111-132, January.
    11. Xia, Lan & Bechwati, Nada Nasr, 2021. "Maximizing what? The effect of maximizing mindset on the evaluation of product bundles," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 314-325.
    12. Yadav, Manjit S, 1994. "How Buyers Evaluate Product Bundles: A Model of Anchoring and Adjustment," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(2), pages 342-353, September.
    13. R. Venkatesh & Wagner Kamakura, 2003. "Optimal Bundling and Pricing under a Monopoly: Contrasting Complements and Substitutes from Independently Valued Products," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 76(2), pages 211-232, April.
    14. Nagle, Thomas, 1984. "Economic Foundations for Pricing," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 57(1), pages 3-26, January.
    15. William James Adams & Janet L. Yellen, 1976. "Commodity Bundling and the Burden of Monopoly," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 90(3), pages 475-498.
    16. Dorothée Honhon & Xiajun Amy Pan, 2017. "Improving Profits by Bundling Vertically Differentiated Products," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(8), pages 1481-1497, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mikkonen, Karri & Niskanen, Hanna & Pynnönen, Mikko & Hallikas, Jukka, 2015. "The presence of emotional factors: An empirical exploration of bundle purchasing process," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(8), pages 642-657.
    2. Tarek Abdallah, 2019. "On the Benefit (Or Cost) of Large‐Scale Bundling," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(4), pages 955-969, April.
    3. Koukova, Nevena T. & Kannan, P.K. & Ratchford, Brian T., 2008. "Product form bundling: Implications for marketing digital products," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 84(2), pages 181-194.
    4. Simonin, Bernard L. & Ruth, Julie A., 1995. "Bundling as a strategy for new product introduction: Effects on consumers' reservation prices for the bundle, the new product, and its tie-in," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 219-230, July.
    5. Lee, Hsiao-Ching & Tsai, Dung Chun & Wu, Ming-De, 2011. "The dilemma of mixed bundles: The effects of price, brand, and content preference on music CD bundle choices," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 18(5), pages 455-462.
    6. Ritwik Raj & Mark H. Karwan & Chase Murray & Lei Sun, 2022. "Itemized pricing in B2B bundles with diminishing reservation prices and loss averse customers," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(4), pages 375-392, August.
    7. Bikram Ghosh & Subramanian Balachander, 2007. "Research Note--Competitive Bundling and Counterbundling with Generalist and Specialist Firms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(1), pages 159-168, January.
    8. Liu Weihua & Yu Hui, 2017. "Pure Components VS Full Mixed Bundling When Stackelberg Pricing," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 5(5), pages 435-445, October.
    9. Kamel Jedidi & Sharan Jagpal & Puneet Manchanda, 2003. "Measuring Heterogeneous Reservation Prices for Product Bundles," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 107-130, July.
    10. Ali Azadeh & Hassan Songhori & Nima Salehi, 2017. "A unique optimization model for deterministic bundle pricing of two products with limited stock," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 8(2), pages 1154-1160, November.
    11. Rustam Ibragimov & Johan Walden, 2010. "Optimal Bundling Strategies Under Heavy-Tailed Valuations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(11), pages 1963-1976, November.
    12. Harlam, Bari A. & Krishna, Aradhna & Lehmann, Donald R. & Mela, Carl, 1995. "Impact of bundle type, price framing and familiarity on purchase intention for the bundle," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 57-66, May.
    13. Rustam Ibragimov, 2004. "Shifting paradigms: on the robustness of economic models to heavy-tailedness assumptions," Econometric Society 2004 Latin American Meetings 105, Econometric Society.
    14. Doha, Ahmed & Ghasemaghaei, Maryam & Hassanein, Khaled, 2017. "Social bundling: A novel method to enhance consumers’ intention to purchase online bundles," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 106-117.
    15. Timothy Gilbride & Joseph Guiltinan & Joel Urbany, 2008. "Framing effects in mixed price bundling," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 125-139, June.
    16. Yan, Ruiliang & Myers, Chris & Wang, John & Ghose, Sanjoy, 2014. "Bundling products to success: The influence of complementarity and advertising," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 48-53.
    17. Jeffrey Meyer & Venkatesh Shankar & Leonard L. Berry, 2018. "Pricing hybrid bundles by understanding the drivers of willingness to pay," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 497-515, May.
    18. Tang, Yuanzhao & Perera, Sandun C. & Cao, Qingning & Ji, Xiang, 2023. "Supplier versus platform bundling: Optimal strategies under agency selling," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    19. Priessner, Alfons & Hampl, Nina, 2020. "Can product bundling increase the joint adoption of electric vehicles, solar panels and battery storage? Explorative evidence from a choice-based conjoint study in Austria," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    20. Cao, Qingning & Tang, Yuanzhao & Perera, Sandun & Zhang, Jianqiang, 2022. "Manufacturer- versus retailer-initiated bundling: Implications for the supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:14:y:2021:i:5:p:192-:d:541212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.