IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v8y2011i2p565-578d11390.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bottled Water: United States Consumers and Their Perceptions of Water Quality

Author

Listed:
  • Zhihua Hu

    (Department of Sociology, Iowa State University, 103 East Hall, Ames, IA 50011, USA)

  • Lois Wright Morton

    (Department of Sociology, Iowa State University, 103 East Hall, Ames, IA 50011, USA)

  • Robert L. Mahler

    (PSES Department, University of Idaho, P.O. Box 442339, Moscow, ID 83844, USA)

Abstract

Consumption of bottled water is increasing worldwide. Prior research shows many consumers believe bottled water is convenient and has better taste than tap water, despite reports of a number of water quality incidents with bottled water. The authors explore the demographic and social factors associated with bottled water users in the U.S. and the relationship between bottled water use and perceptions of the quality of local water supply. They find that U.S. consumers are more likely to report bottled water as their primary drinking water source when they perceive that drinking water is not safe. Furthermore, those who give lower ratings to the quality of their ground water are more likely to regularly purchase bottle water for drinking and use bottle water as their primary drinking water source.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhihua Hu & Lois Wright Morton & Robert L. Mahler, 2011. "Bottled Water: United States Consumers and Their Perceptions of Water Quality," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-14, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:8:y:2011:i:2:p:565-578:d:11390
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/8/2/565/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/8/2/565/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Donna M. Dosman & Wiktor L. Adamowicz & Steve E. Hrudey, 2001. "Socioeconomic Determinants of Health‐ and Food Safety‐Related Risk Perceptions," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(2), pages 307-318, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Suntorn Sudsandee & Krailak Fakkaew & Vivat Keawdounglek & Pussadee Laor & Suwalee Worakhunpiset & Tawatchai Apidechkul, 2020. "Drinking Water Investigation of Hill Tribes: A Case Study in Northern Thailand," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-13, March.
    2. Jessica C. Wedgworth & Joe Brown & Pauline Johnson & Julie B. Olson & Mark Elliott & Rick Forehand & Christine E. Stauber, 2014. "Associations between Perceptions of Drinking Water Service Delivery and Measured Drinking Water Quality in Rural Alabama," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, July.
    3. Joshua D. Miller & Chad Staddon & Aaron Salzberg & Julius B. Lucks & Wändi Bruine de Bruin & Sera L. Young, 2024. "Self-reported anticipated harm from drinking water across 141 countries," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Liu, Yanan & Klaiber, Allen, 2022. "The Impact of Harmful Algal Blooms on Household Averting Expenditure," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322117, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    5. Argyrios Periferakis & Ana Caruntu & Aristodemos-Theodoros Periferakis & Andreea-Elena Scheau & Ioana Anca Badarau & Constantin Caruntu & Cristian Scheau, 2022. "Availability, Toxicology and Medical Significance of Antimony," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-29, April.
    6. Razi Mahmood & Norr Hassan & Ashraf Chamseddine & Ravi Rangarajan & Rami Yassoub, 2024. "Examining Drinking Water Preferences among University Students: A Comparative Assessment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(10), pages 1-14, September.
    7. Namakando, Namakando, 2020. "Stakeholder perceptions of raw water quality and its management in Fetakgomo and Maruleng municipalities of Limpopo Province," Research Theses 334769, Collaborative Masters Program in Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    8. Lianne McLeod & Lalita Bharadwaj & Cheryl Waldner, 2014. "Risk Factors Associated with the Choice to Drink Bottled Water and Tap Water in Rural Saskatchewan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-21, January.
    9. Yanan Liu & H. Allen Klaiber, 2023. "Don’t Drink the Water! The Impact of Harmful Algal Blooms on Household Averting Expenditure," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 86(1), pages 29-55, October.
    10. Erica L. Kenney & James G. Daly & Rebekka M. Lee & Rebecca S. Mozaffarian & Katherine Walsh & Jill Carter & Steven L. Gortmaker, 2019. "Providing Students with Adequate School Drinking Water Access in an Era of Aging Infrastructure: A Mixed Methods Investigation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-15, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiyoun Kim & Sara K. Yeo & Dominique Brossard & Dietram A. Scheufele & Michael A. Xenos, 2014. "Disentangling the Influence of Value Predispositions and Risk/Benefit Perceptions on Support for Nanotechnology Among the American Public," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(5), pages 965-980, May.
    2. Yang, Ya Ling, 2020. "Comparison of public perception and risk management decisions of aircraft noise near Taoyuan and Kaohsiung International Airports," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    3. Justin Baker & W. Douglass Shaw & Mary Riddel & Richard T. Woodward, 2009. "Changes in subjective risks of hurricanes as time passes: analysis of a sample of Katrina evacuees," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 59-74, January.
    4. Zhihua Xu & Jingzhu Shan, 2018. "The effect of risk perception on willingness to pay for reductions in the health risks posed by particulate matter 2.5: A case study of Beijing, China," Energy & Environment, , vol. 29(8), pages 1319-1337, December.
    5. Tianjun Feng & L. Robin Keller & Ping Wu & Yifan Xu, 2014. "An Empirical Study of the Toxic Capsule Crisis in China: Risk Perceptions and Behavioral Responses," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(4), pages 698-710, April.
    6. Yu-Hui Chen & Kai-Han Qiu & Kang Ernest Liu & Chun-Yuan Chiang, 2020. "Are Consumers Willing to Pay a Premium for Pure Rice Noodles? A Study of Discrete Choice Experiments in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-18, July.
    7. Desta Woldetsadik & Pay Drechsel & Bernard Keraita & Fisseha Itanna & Heluf Gebrekidan, 2018. "Farmers’ perceptions on irrigation water contamination, health risks and risk management measures in prominent wastewater-irrigated vegetable farming sites of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 52-64, March.
    8. Violet Muringai & Ellen Goddard, 2018. "Trust and consumer risk perceptions regarding BSE and chronic wasting disease," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(2), pages 240-265, March.
    9. C. M. Jolly & B. Bayard & S. Vodouhe, 2009. "Risks of Ingestion of Aflatoxin‐Contaminated Groundnuts in Benin: Scale Measurements, Beliefs, and Socioeconomic Factors," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(10), pages 1395-1409, October.
    10. Cyrielle Gaglio & Simone Pfuderer & Bodo Steiner, 2024. "Sustainability initiatives in food supply chains from stakeholders' perspectives: An analysis of predictors of cognition-based trust and trust initiatives," French Stata Users' Group Meetings 2024 24, Stata Users Group.
    11. Ghislain B. D. Aïhounton & Arne Henningsen & Neda Trifkovic, 2021. "Pesticide Handling and Human Health: Conventional and Organic Cotton Farming in Benin," IFRO Working Paper 2021/06, University of Copenhagen, Department of Food and Resource Economics.
    12. Thanh Mai Ha & Shamim Shakur & Kim Hang Pham Do, 2019. "Consumers’ Perception of Food Safety Risk From Vegetables: A Rural - Urban Comparison," Discussion Papers 1902, School of Economics and Finance, Massey University, New Zealand.
    13. Ryoko Nakano & Tomio Miwa & Takayuki Morikawa, 2019. "Factors Promoting Clean Energy in Japanese Cities: Nuclear Risks Versus Climate Change Risks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-15, December.
    14. Konstantinos Drakos & Catherine Mueller, 2014. "On the Determinants of Terrorism Risk Concern in Europe," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 291-310, June.
    15. Janneke De Jonge & Hans Van Trijp & Reint Jan Renes & Lynn Frewer, 2007. "Understanding Consumer Confidence in the Safety of Food: Its Two‐Dimensional Structure and Determinants," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3), pages 729-740, June.
    16. Chinh Ho & Corinne Mulley, 2015. "Intra-household interactions in transport research: a review," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 33-55, January.
    17. Md Rokonuzzaman & Zhihong Ye & Chuan Wu & Wai-Chin Li, 2023. "Arsenic Elevated Groundwater Irrigation: Farmers’ Perception of Rice and Vegetable Contamination in a Naturally Arsenic Endemic Area," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-19, March.
    18. John T. Brady, 2012. "Health risk perceptions across time in the USA," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(6), pages 547-563, June.
    19. Liang Ma & Peng Liu, 2019. "Missing links between regulatory resources and risk concerns: Evidence from the case of food safety in China," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(1), pages 35-50, March.
    20. Petit, Joshua D. & Needham, Mark D. & Howe, Glenn T., 2021. "Cognitive and demographic drivers of attitudes toward using genetic engineering to restore American chestnut trees," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:8:y:2011:i:2:p:565-578:d:11390. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.