IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v21y2024i10p1271-d1485203.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining Drinking Water Preferences among University Students: A Comparative Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Razi Mahmood

    (Department of Public Health, AFG College with the University of Aberdeen, Doha P.O. Box 10805, Qatar)

  • Norr Hassan

    (Department of Environmental Health and Safety, University of Doha for Science and Technology, Doha P.O. Box 24449, Qatar)

  • Ashraf Chamseddine

    (Department of Environmental Health and Safety, University of Doha for Science and Technology, Doha P.O. Box 24449, Qatar)

  • Ravi Rangarajan

    (Department of Environmental Health and Safety, University of Doha for Science and Technology, Doha P.O. Box 24449, Qatar)

  • Rami Yassoub

    (Department of Quality, Patient Experience and Health Informatics, Sidra Medicine, Doha P.O. Box 26999, Qatar)

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a clear increase in bottled water consumption globally, which has led to significant health and environmental concerns. This cross-sectional study aims to understand the attitude and preferences of university students in Qatar towards the use of bottled and tap drinking water using an online survey questionnaire (September and October 2022). The number of students who responded to the online survey was 14% ( n = 688) of the student population, with a mean age of 22.23 ± 5.15 years from the different colleges. Overall, a higher fraction of students preferred plastic bottled water as the main drinking source on campus ( n = 468; 68.02%), with a majority of them being females (72.08%). Out of the 468 students who preferred plastic bottled water, safety was the most important factor (43.80%), followed by convenience (16.88%) and taste (15.60%). Cost (15.17%), personal/family habits (5.13%), environmental concerns (2.14%), and mineral content (1.28%) were found to be the least important factors. Among the 45 students (6.54%) who preferred tap water over plastic bottled water, cost (46.67%) was the dominant factor, followed by convenience (20.00%), environmental concerns and safety (13.33% each), taste (4.44%), and personal/family habits (2.22%). Around 72% believed that plastic water bottles were more harmful to the environment, yet the greater majority still resorted to this source. The research study underscores safety as the major factor favoring bottled water over tap water. Further, it suggests that knowledge alone does not fully explain student behavior, implying other influential factors. This study recommends campaigns focus on attitude and behavior change and not solely emphasize knowledge. There is an immediate need to further educate students through environmental and health literacy programs on water consumption and quality. Enabling the population to understand the positive and negative aspects of their choices may be an effective remedy for ensuring a healthy population and healthy environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Razi Mahmood & Norr Hassan & Ashraf Chamseddine & Ravi Rangarajan & Rami Yassoub, 2024. "Examining Drinking Water Preferences among University Students: A Comparative Assessment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(10), pages 1-14, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:10:p:1271-:d:1485203
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/10/1271/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/10/1271/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhihua Hu & Lois Wright Morton & Robert L. Mahler, 2011. "Bottled Water: United States Consumers and Their Perceptions of Water Quality," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-14, February.
    2. Alasdair Cohen & Md Rasheduzzaman & Amanda Darling & Leigh-Anne Krometis & Marc Edwards & Teresa Brown & Tahmina Ahmed & Erin Wettstone & Suporn Pholwat & Mami Taniuchi & Elizabeth T. Rogawski McQuade, 2022. "Bottled and Well Water Quality in a Small Central Appalachian Community: Household-Level Analysis of Enteric Pathogens, Inorganic Chemicals, and Health Outcomes in Rural Southwest Virginia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-12, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Argyrios Periferakis & Ana Caruntu & Aristodemos-Theodoros Periferakis & Andreea-Elena Scheau & Ioana Anca Badarau & Constantin Caruntu & Cristian Scheau, 2022. "Availability, Toxicology and Medical Significance of Antimony," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-29, April.
    2. Joshua D. Miller & Chad Staddon & Aaron Salzberg & Julius B. Lucks & Wändi Bruine de Bruin & Sera L. Young, 2024. "Self-reported anticipated harm from drinking water across 141 countries," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Namakando, Namakando, 2020. "Stakeholder perceptions of raw water quality and its management in Fetakgomo and Maruleng municipalities of Limpopo Province," Research Theses 334769, Collaborative Masters Program in Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    4. Suntorn Sudsandee & Krailak Fakkaew & Vivat Keawdounglek & Pussadee Laor & Suwalee Worakhunpiset & Tawatchai Apidechkul, 2020. "Drinking Water Investigation of Hill Tribes: A Case Study in Northern Thailand," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-13, March.
    5. Jessica C. Wedgworth & Joe Brown & Pauline Johnson & Julie B. Olson & Mark Elliott & Rick Forehand & Christine E. Stauber, 2014. "Associations between Perceptions of Drinking Water Service Delivery and Measured Drinking Water Quality in Rural Alabama," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, July.
    6. Liu, Yanan & Klaiber, Allen, 2022. "The Impact of Harmful Algal Blooms on Household Averting Expenditure," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322117, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    7. Yanan Liu & H. Allen Klaiber, 2023. "Don’t Drink the Water! The Impact of Harmful Algal Blooms on Household Averting Expenditure," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 86(1), pages 29-55, October.
    8. Lianne McLeod & Lalita Bharadwaj & Cheryl Waldner, 2014. "Risk Factors Associated with the Choice to Drink Bottled Water and Tap Water in Rural Saskatchewan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-21, January.
    9. Erica L. Kenney & James G. Daly & Rebekka M. Lee & Rebecca S. Mozaffarian & Katherine Walsh & Jill Carter & Steven L. Gortmaker, 2019. "Providing Students with Adequate School Drinking Water Access in an Era of Aging Infrastructure: A Mixed Methods Investigation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-15, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:10:p:1271-:d:1485203. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.