IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v21y2024i7p878-d1429246.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Implementation Evaluation of the Smartphone-Enhanced Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid (SEVIA) Program for Cervical Cancer Prevention in Urban and Rural Tanzania

Author

Listed:
  • Alyssa L. Ferguson

    (Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 0K9, Canada)

  • Erica Erwin

    (Department of Medicine, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada)

  • Jessica Sleeth

    (Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, ON K7L 2V5, Canada)

  • Nicola Symonds

    (School of Medicine, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada)

  • Sidonie Chard

    (Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, D02 YN77 Dublin, Ireland)

  • Safina Yuma

    (Ministry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly, and Children, Dodoma 40478, Tanzania)

  • Olola Oneko

    (Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Center, Moshi P.O. Box 3010, Tanzania)

  • Godwin Macheku

    (Ministry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly, and Children, Dodoma 40478, Tanzania)

  • Linda Andrews

    (Pamoja Tunaweza Women’s Centre, Moshi P.O. Box 8434, Tanzania)

  • Nicola West

    (Department of Medicine, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada)

  • Melinda Chelva

    (Department of Medicine, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada)

  • Ophira Ginsburg

    (Center for Global Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892-9760, USA)

  • Karen Yeates

    (Department of Medicine, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada)

Abstract

Introduction: The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) for cervical cancer screening (CCS) in lower-resource settings; however, quality varies widely, and it is difficult to maintain a well-trained cadre of providers. The Smartphone-Enhanced Visual Inspection with Acetic acid (SEVIA) program was designed to offer secure sharing of cervical images and real-time supportive supervision to health care workers, in order to improve the quality and accuracy of visual assessment of the cervix for treatment. The purpose of this evaluation was to document early learnings from patients, providers, and higher-level program stakeholders, on barriers and enablers to program implementation. Methods: From 9 September to 8 December 2016, observational activities and open-ended interviews were conducted with image reviewers (n = 5), providers (n = 17), community mobilizers (n = 14), patients (n = 21), supervisors (n = 4) and implementation partners (n = 5) involved with SEVIA. Sixty-six interviews were conducted at 14 facilities, in all five of the program regions Results SEVIA was found to be a highly regarded tool for the enhancement of CCS services in Northern Tanzania. Acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, feasibility, and coverage of the intervention were highly recognized. It appeared to be an effective means of improving good clinical practice among providers and fit seamlessly into existing roles and processes. Barriers to implementation included network connectivity issues, and community misconceptions and the adoption of CCS more generally. Conclusions: SEVIA is a practical and feasible mobile health intervention and tool that is easily integrated into the National CCS program to enhance the quality of care.

Suggested Citation

  • Alyssa L. Ferguson & Erica Erwin & Jessica Sleeth & Nicola Symonds & Sidonie Chard & Safina Yuma & Olola Oneko & Godwin Macheku & Linda Andrews & Nicola West & Melinda Chelva & Ophira Ginsburg & Karen, 2024. "An Implementation Evaluation of the Smartphone-Enhanced Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid (SEVIA) Program for Cervical Cancer Prevention in Urban and Rural Tanzania," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(7), pages 1-14, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:7:p:878-:d:1429246
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/7/878/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/7/878/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gaglio, B. & Shoup, J.A. & Glasgow, R.E., 2013. "The RE-AIM framework: A systematic review of use over time," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 103(6), pages 38-46.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chelsea M. Cooper & Mary Drake & Justine A. Kavle & Joyce Nyoni & Ruth Lemwayi & Lemmy Mabuga & Anne Pfitzer & Mary Makungu & Elizabeth Massawe & John George, 2021. "Implementing a Novel Facility-Community Intervention for Strengthening Integration of Infant Nutrition and Family Planning in Mara and Kagera, Tanzania," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Natalie Bradford & Shirley Chambers & Adrienne Hudson & Jacqui Jauncey‐Cooke & Robyn Penny & Carol Windsor & Patsy Yates, 2019. "Evaluation frameworks in health services: An integrative review of use, attributes and elements," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(13-14), pages 2486-2498, July.
    3. Kristen C. Reilly & Patricia Tucker & Jennifer D. Irwin & Andrew M. Johnson & Erin S. Pearson & Dirk E. Bock & Shauna M. Burke, 2018. "“C.H.A.M.P. Families”: Description and Theoretical Foundations of a Paediatric Overweight and Obesity Intervention Targeting Parents—A Single-Centre Non-Randomised Feasibility Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-23, December.
    4. Marsha L. Brierley & Lindsey R. Smith & Angel M. Chater & Daniel P. Bailey, 2022. "A-REST (Activity to Reduce Excessive Sitting Time): A Feasibility Trial to Reduce Prolonged Sitting in Police Staff," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-27, July.
    5. Aisha Lofters & Kimberly Devotta & Vijayshree Prakash & Mandana Vahabi, 2021. "Understanding the Acceptability and Uptake of HPV Self-Sampling Amongst Women Under- or Never-Screened for Cervical Cancer in Toronto (Ontario, Canada): An Intervention Study Protocol," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-11, August.
    6. Glorian Sorensen & Susan Peters & Karina Nielsen & Eve Nagler & Melissa Karapanos & Lorraine Wallace & Lisa Burke & Jack T. Dennerlein & Gregory R. Wagner, 2019. "Improving Working Conditions to Promote Worker Safety, Health, and Wellbeing for Low-Wage Workers: The Workplace Organizational Health Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-16, April.
    7. Krisdaniel Berreta & Cynthia Nguyen & Alexis M. Stoner & Lindsey Ridgeway & Angela Wilson & Natalie Fadel & Duke Biber, 2023. "A RE-AIM Analysis of a Mental Health App for Undergraduate and Medical Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(13), pages 1-9, June.
    8. Glasgow, LaShawn & Adams, Elizabeth & Smith, Lucia Rojas & Renaud, Jeanette, 2020. "Key Insights on Participation Measurement from Real-world Health Care Interventions," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    9. Kristen C. Reilly & Daniel Briatico & Jennifer D. Irwin & Patricia Tucker & Erin S. Pearson & Shauna M. Burke, 2019. "Participants’ Perceptions of “C.H.A.M.P. Families”: A Parent-Focused Intervention Targeting Paediatric Overweight and Obesity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-24, June.
    10. Liliana Tenney & Amy G. Huebschmann & Carol E. Brown & Natalie V. Schwatka & Lee S. Newman, 2022. "Leveraging an Implementation Science Framework to Measure the Impact of Efforts to Scale Out a Total Worker Health ® Intervention to Employers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-20, January.
    11. Natale, Ruby A. & Kolomeyer, Ellen & Robleto, Ana & Jaffery, Zafreen & Spector, Rachel, 2020. "Utilizing the RE-AIM framework to determine effectiveness of a preschool intervention program on social-emotional outcomes," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    12. Norris, E. & Dunsmuir, S. & Duke-Williams, O. & Stamatakis, E. & Shelton, N., 2018. "Mixed method evaluation of the Virtual Traveller physically active lesson intervention: An analysis using the RE-AIM framework," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 107-114.
    13. McCabe, Lisa A. & Ruberti, Mary R. & Endres, Thomas, 2022. "Sustaining program implementation: A co-constructed technical assistance process to support continuous high-quality implementation of the Therapeutic Crisis Intervention program," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    14. Rehana A Salam & Jai K Das & Zahra Hoodbhoy & Karim Rizwan Nathani & Zulfiqar A Bhutta, 2018. "PROTOCOL: Effects of lifestyle modification interventions to prevent and manage child and adolescent obesity: a systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(1), pages 1-33.
    15. Sebastià Mas-Alòs & Antoni Planas-Anzano & Xavier Peirau-Terés & Jordi Real-Gatius & Gisela Galindo-Ortego, 2021. "Feasibility Assessment of the Let’s Walk Programme (CAMINEM): Exercise Training and Health Promotion in Primary Health-Care Settings," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-18, March.
    16. Shanahan, Meghan & Fleming, Phyllis & Nocera, Maryalice & Sullivan, Kelly & Murphy, Robert & Zolotor, Adam, 2014. "Process evaluation of a statewide abusive head trauma prevention program," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 18-25.
    17. Catriona L. Rose & Katherine B. Owen & Bridget C. Foley & Lindsey J. Reece, 2022. "“We Don’t Have to Do Things the Way They’ve Been Done Before”; Mixed-Method Evaluation of a National Grant Program Tackling Physical Inactivity through Sport," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-16, June.
    18. Arora, Prerna G. & Connors, Elizabeth H. & Blizzard, Angela & Coble, Kelly & Gloff, Nicole & Pruitt, David, 2017. "Dissemination and implementation science in program evaluation: A telemental health clinical consultation case example," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 56-63.
    19. Bradford W. Hesse & Richard P. Moser & William T. Riley, 2015. "From Big Data to Knowledge in the Social Sciences," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 659(1), pages 16-32, May.
    20. Marcia G. Ory & Shinduk Lee & Samuel D. Towne & Starr Flores & Olga Gabriel & Matthew Lee Smith, 2020. "Implementing a Diabetes Education Program to Reduce Health Disparities in South Texas: Application of the RE-AIM Framework for Planning and Evaluation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-19, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:7:p:878-:d:1429246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.