IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v70y2018icp107-114.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mixed method evaluation of the Virtual Traveller physically active lesson intervention: An analysis using the RE-AIM framework

Author

Listed:
  • Norris, E.
  • Dunsmuir, S.
  • Duke-Williams, O.
  • Stamatakis, E.
  • Shelton, N.

Abstract

Physically active lessons integrating movement into academic content are a way to increase children’s physical activity levels. Virtual Traveller was a physically active lesson intervention set in Year 4 (aged 8–9) primary school classes in Greater London, UK. Implemented by classroom teachers, it was a six-week intervention providing 10-min physically active Virtual Field Trips three times a week. The aim of this paper is to report the process evaluation of the Virtual Traveller randomized controlled trial according to RE-AIM framework criteria (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance).

Suggested Citation

  • Norris, E. & Dunsmuir, S. & Duke-Williams, O. & Stamatakis, E. & Shelton, N., 2018. "Mixed method evaluation of the Virtual Traveller physically active lesson intervention: An analysis using the RE-AIM framework," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 107-114.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:70:y:2018:i:c:p:107-114
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.01.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718917302616
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.01.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Glasgow, R.E. & Vogt, T.M. & Boles, S.M., 1999. "Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: The RE-AIM framework," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 89(9), pages 1322-1327.
    2. Webster, Collin A. & Zarrett, Nicole & Cook, Brittany S. & Egan, Cate & Nesbitt, Danielle & Weaver, R. Glenn, 2017. "Movement integration in elementary classrooms: Teacher perceptions and implications for program planning," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 134-143.
    3. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    4. Gaglio, B. & Shoup, J.A. & Glasgow, R.E., 2013. "The RE-AIM framework: A systematic review of use over time," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 103(6), pages 38-46.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adriana Nielsen-Rodríguez & Ramón Romance & Juan Carlos Dobado-Castañeda, 2021. "Teaching Methodologies and School Organization in Early Childhood Education and Its Association with Physical Activity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-25, April.
    2. Marsha L. Brierley & Lindsey R. Smith & Angel M. Chater & Daniel P. Bailey, 2022. "A-REST (Activity to Reduce Excessive Sitting Time): A Feasibility Trial to Reduce Prolonged Sitting in Police Staff," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-27, July.
    3. Teasdale, Rebecca M. & Strasser, Mikayla & Moore, Ceily & Graham, Kara E., 2023. "Evaluative criteria in practice: Findings from an analysis of evaluations published in Evaluation and Program Planning," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chelsea M. Cooper & Mary Drake & Justine A. Kavle & Joyce Nyoni & Ruth Lemwayi & Lemmy Mabuga & Anne Pfitzer & Mary Makungu & Elizabeth Massawe & John George, 2021. "Implementing a Novel Facility-Community Intervention for Strengthening Integration of Infant Nutrition and Family Planning in Mara and Kagera, Tanzania," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Natalie Bradford & Shirley Chambers & Adrienne Hudson & Jacqui Jauncey‐Cooke & Robyn Penny & Carol Windsor & Patsy Yates, 2019. "Evaluation frameworks in health services: An integrative review of use, attributes and elements," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(13-14), pages 2486-2498, July.
    3. Kristen C. Reilly & Patricia Tucker & Jennifer D. Irwin & Andrew M. Johnson & Erin S. Pearson & Dirk E. Bock & Shauna M. Burke, 2018. "“C.H.A.M.P. Families”: Description and Theoretical Foundations of a Paediatric Overweight and Obesity Intervention Targeting Parents—A Single-Centre Non-Randomised Feasibility Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-23, December.
    4. Marsha L. Brierley & Lindsey R. Smith & Angel M. Chater & Daniel P. Bailey, 2022. "A-REST (Activity to Reduce Excessive Sitting Time): A Feasibility Trial to Reduce Prolonged Sitting in Police Staff," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-27, July.
    5. Krisdaniel Berreta & Cynthia Nguyen & Alexis M. Stoner & Lindsey Ridgeway & Angela Wilson & Natalie Fadel & Duke Biber, 2023. "A RE-AIM Analysis of a Mental Health App for Undergraduate and Medical Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(13), pages 1-9, June.
    6. Glasgow, LaShawn & Adams, Elizabeth & Smith, Lucia Rojas & Renaud, Jeanette, 2020. "Key Insights on Participation Measurement from Real-world Health Care Interventions," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    7. Kristen C. Reilly & Daniel Briatico & Jennifer D. Irwin & Patricia Tucker & Erin S. Pearson & Shauna M. Burke, 2019. "Participants’ Perceptions of “C.H.A.M.P. Families”: A Parent-Focused Intervention Targeting Paediatric Overweight and Obesity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-24, June.
    8. Liliana Tenney & Amy G. Huebschmann & Carol E. Brown & Natalie V. Schwatka & Lee S. Newman, 2022. "Leveraging an Implementation Science Framework to Measure the Impact of Efforts to Scale Out a Total Worker Health ® Intervention to Employers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-20, January.
    9. Natale, Ruby A. & Kolomeyer, Ellen & Robleto, Ana & Jaffery, Zafreen & Spector, Rachel, 2020. "Utilizing the RE-AIM framework to determine effectiveness of a preschool intervention program on social-emotional outcomes," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    10. McCabe, Lisa A. & Ruberti, Mary R. & Endres, Thomas, 2022. "Sustaining program implementation: A co-constructed technical assistance process to support continuous high-quality implementation of the Therapeutic Crisis Intervention program," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    11. Rehana A Salam & Jai K Das & Zahra Hoodbhoy & Karim Rizwan Nathani & Zulfiqar A Bhutta, 2018. "PROTOCOL: Effects of lifestyle modification interventions to prevent and manage child and adolescent obesity: a systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(1), pages 1-33.
    12. Sebastià Mas-Alòs & Antoni Planas-Anzano & Xavier Peirau-Terés & Jordi Real-Gatius & Gisela Galindo-Ortego, 2021. "Feasibility Assessment of the Let’s Walk Programme (CAMINEM): Exercise Training and Health Promotion in Primary Health-Care Settings," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-18, March.
    13. Shanahan, Meghan & Fleming, Phyllis & Nocera, Maryalice & Sullivan, Kelly & Murphy, Robert & Zolotor, Adam, 2014. "Process evaluation of a statewide abusive head trauma prevention program," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 18-25.
    14. Arora, Prerna G. & Connors, Elizabeth H. & Blizzard, Angela & Coble, Kelly & Gloff, Nicole & Pruitt, David, 2017. "Dissemination and implementation science in program evaluation: A telemental health clinical consultation case example," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 56-63.
    15. Patrícia de Oliveira Bastos & Ana Suelen Pedroza Cavalcante & Wallingson Michael Gonçalves Pereira & Victor Hugo Santos de Castro & Antonio Rodrigues Ferreira Júnior & Paulo Henrique Guerra & Kelly Sa, 2020. "Health Promoting School Interventions in Latin America: A Systematic Review Protocol on the Dimensions of the RE-AIM Framework," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-9, July.
    16. Saeideh Sharifi fard & Ezhar Tamam & Md Salleh Hj Hassan & Moniza Waheed & Zeinab Zaremohzzabieh, 2016. "Factors affecting Malaysian university students’ purchase intention in social networking sites," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 1182612-118, December.
    17. Chou, Jui-Sheng & Gusti Ayu Novi Yutami, I, 2014. "Smart meter adoption and deployment strategy for residential buildings in Indonesia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 336-349.
    18. Philippe Cohard, 2020. "Information Systems Values: A Study of the Intranet in Three French Higher Education Institutions," Post-Print hal-02987225, HAL.
    19. Melih Engin & Fatih Gürses, 2019. "Adoption of Hospital Information Systems in Public Hospitals in Turkey: An Analysis with the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology Model," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(06), pages 1-19, October.
    20. Morosan, Cristian, 2016. "An empirical examination of U.S. travelers’ intentions to use biometric e-gates in airports," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 120-128.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:70:y:2018:i:c:p:107-114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.