IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i12p6077-d1166143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing Co-Creation Research in Food Retail Environments: A Descriptive Case Study of a Healthy Supermarket Initiative in Regional Victoria, Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Carmen Vargas

    (Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition (GLOBE), Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia)

  • Jillian Whelan

    (Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition (GLOBE), Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia)

  • Louise Feery

    (Ballarat Community Health, Ballarat, VIC 3350, Australia)

  • Deborah Greenslade

    (Ballarat Community Health, Ballarat, VIC 3350, Australia)

  • Melissa Farrington

    (Ballarat Community Health, Ballarat, VIC 3350, Australia)

  • Julie Brimblecombe

    (Department of Nutrition, Dietetics and Food, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia)

  • Freddy Thuruthikattu

    (Primary Care Connect, Shepparton, VIC 3630, Australia)

  • Steven Allender

    (Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition (GLOBE), Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia)

Abstract

Research into the co-creation of healthy food retail is in its early stages. One way to advance co-creation research is to explore and understand how co-creation was applied in developing, implementing, and evaluating a heath-enabling initiative in a supermarket in regional Victoria, Australia. A case study design was used to explore and understand how co-creation was applied in the Eat Well, Feel Good Ballarat project. Six documents and reports related to the Eat Well, Feel Good Ballarat project were analyzed with findings from the focus groups and interviews. Motivations to develop or implement health-enabling supermarket initiatives differed among the participants. Participants considered that initial negotiations were insufficient to keep the momentum going and to propose the value to the retailers to scale up the project. Presenting community-identified needs to the supermarket helped gain the retailer’s attention, whilst the co-design process helped the implementation. Showcasing the project to the community through media exposure kept the supermarket interested. Retailers’ time constraints and staff turnover were considered significant barriers to partnership building. This case study contributes insights into applying co-creation to health-enabling strategies in food retail outlets using two co-creation frameworks.

Suggested Citation

  • Carmen Vargas & Jillian Whelan & Louise Feery & Deborah Greenslade & Melissa Farrington & Julie Brimblecombe & Freddy Thuruthikattu & Steven Allender, 2023. "Developing Co-Creation Research in Food Retail Environments: A Descriptive Case Study of a Healthy Supermarket Initiative in Regional Victoria, Australia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(12), pages 1-18, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:12:p:6077-:d:1166143
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/12/6077/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/12/6077/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pera, Rebecca & Occhiocupo, Nicoletta & Clarke, Jackie, 2016. "Motives and resources for value co-creation in a multi-stakeholder ecosystem: A managerial perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 4033-4041.
    2. Megan R. Winkler & Shannon N. Zenk & Barbara Baquero & Elizabeth Anderson Steeves & Sheila E. Fleischhacker & Joel Gittelsohn & Lucia A Leone & Elizabeth F. Racine, 2020. "A Model Depicting the Retail Food Environment and Customer Interactions: Components, Outcomes, and Future Directions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-21, October.
    3. Stephanie E. Austin & Robbert Biesbroek & Lea Berrang-Ford & James D. Ford & Stephen Parker & Manon D. Fleury, 2016. "Public Health Adaptation to Climate Change in OECD Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, September.
    4. Iana A. Castro & Anuja Majmundar & Christine B. Williams & Barbara Baquero, 2018. "Customer Purchase Intentions and Choice in Food Retail Environments: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-19, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ivan Fedorenko & Pierre Berthon, 2017. "Beyond the expected benefits: unpacking value co-creation in crowdsourcing business models," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 7(3), pages 183-194, December.
    2. Secundo, Giustina & Del Vecchio, Pasquale & Simeone, Luca & Schiuma, Giovanni, 2020. "Creativity and stakeholders' engagement in open innovation: Design for knowledge translation in technology-intensive enterprises," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 272-282.
    3. Wenwen Shen & Yuankun Nie & Chao Long & Zibo Song & Qian Zhang & Decai Tang, 2022. "Research on the Mechanism of Collaborative Value Co-Creation of Enterprise–Science Community: A Case Study Based on the Green Brand Maoduoli," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-19, November.
    4. Santosh R. Pathak & Neera Shrestha Pradhan & Sadiksha Guragai & Bulbul Baksi & Fayezurahman Azizi & Arun Bhakta Shrestha, 2022. "Complexities and Opportunities of Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships: A Case Study of Water Resource Management in Afghanistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-14, November.
    5. Yvette Buist & Marleen Bekker & Lenneke Vaandrager & Maria Koelen, 2021. "Understanding Public Health Adaptation to Climate Change: An Explorative Study on the Development of Adaptation Strategies Relating to the Oak Processionary Moth in The Netherlands," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-19, March.
    6. Peng, Hui & Lu, Yaobin & Gupta, Sumeet, 2023. "Promoting value emergence through digital platform ecosystems: Perspectives on resource integration in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    7. Chih-Shiang (Mike) Wu & Tung-Jung (David) Sung, 2021. "Applying Values-Led Communication Design to Engage Stakeholders in Developing Dementia-Friendly Visitor Destinations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-25, April.
    8. Mohd Danish Khan & Hong Ha Thi Vu & Quang Tuan Lai & Ji Whan Ahn, 2019. "Aggravation of Human Diseases and Climate Change Nexus," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-26, August.
    9. Siaw, Christopher Agyapong & Sarpong, David, 2021. "Dynamic exchange capabilities for value co-creation in ecosystems," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 493-506.
    10. Araceli Galiano Coronil, 2022. "Behavior as an approach to identifying target groups from a social marketing perspective," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 19(2), pages 265-287, June.
    11. Matzner, Martin & Büttgen, Marion & Demirkan, Haluk & Spohrer, Jim & Alter, Steven & Fritzsche, Albrecht & Ng, Irene C. L. & Jonas, Julia M. & Martinez, Veronica & Möslein, Kathrin M. & Neely, Andy, 2018. "Digital Transformation in Service Management," SMR - Journal of Service Management Research, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 2(2), pages 3-21.
    12. Indre Kalinauskaite & Rens Brankaert & Yuan Lu & Tilde Bekker & Aarnout Brombacher & Steven Vos, 2021. "Facing Societal Challenges in Living Labs: Towards a Conceptual Framework to Facilitate Transdisciplinary Collaborations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-14, January.
    13. Sanjit K. Roy & Gaganpreet Singh & Corey Hatton & Bidit Dey & Nisreen Ameen & Satish Kumar, 2023. "Customers’ motives to co-create in smart services interactions," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 1367-1400, September.
    14. Luckrezia Awuor & Richard Meldrum & Eric N. Liberda, 2020. "Institutional Engagement Practices as Barriers to Public Health Capacity in Climate Change Policy Discourse: Lessons from the Canadian Province of Ontario," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-35, August.
    15. Guillaume Dumont & Mart Ots, 2020. "Social dynamics and stakeholder relationships in personal branding," Post-Print hal-02312404, HAL.
    16. repec:hal:journl:hal-04816732 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Mary Fox & Christopher Zuidema & Bridget Bauman & Thomas Burke & Mary Sheehan, 2019. "Integrating Public Health into Climate Change Policy and Planning: State of Practice Update," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-22, September.
    18. Reckien, Diana & Buzasi, Attila & Olazabal, Marta & Spyridaki, Niki-Artemis & Eckersley, Peter & Simoes, Sofia G. & Salvia, Monica & Pietrapertosa, Filomena & Fokaides, Paris & Goonesekera, Sascha M. , 2023. "Quality of urban climate adaptation plans over time," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 3, pages 1-14.
    19. Vhushavhelo Nedzingahe & Betrand Ayuk Tambe & Mthokozisi Kwazi Zuma & Xikombiso Gertrude Mbhenyane, 2023. "Associations among Food Systems, Food Environments, Food Choices, Food Security, and Nutrition Transition in Limpopo Province, South Africa: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(16), pages 1-21, August.
    20. Chao Gu & Tingting Huang & Wei Wei & Chun Yang & Jiangjie Chen & Wei Miao & Shuyuan Lin & Hanchu Sun & Jie Sun, 2023. "The Effect of Using Augmented Reality Technology in Takeaway Food Packaging to Improve Young Consumers’ Negative Evaluations," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-35, January.
    21. Pucci, Tommaso & Casprini, Elena & Galati, Antonino & Zanni, Lorenzo, 2020. "The virtuous cycle of stakeholder engagement in developing a sustainability culture: Salcheto winery," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 364-376.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:12:p:6077-:d:1166143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.