IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i22p15439-d978992.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Mechanism of Collaborative Value Co-Creation of Enterprise–Science Community: A Case Study Based on the Green Brand Maoduoli

Author

Listed:
  • Wenwen Shen

    (Business School, Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, Kunming 650221, China)

  • Yuankun Nie

    (Business School, Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, Kunming 650221, China)

  • Chao Long

    (Institute of Finance, Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, Kunming 650221, China)

  • Zibo Song

    (Yunnan Mao Duo Li Group Food Co., Ltd., Kunming 650221, China)

  • Qian Zhang

    (Business School, Nanjing Xiaozhuang University, Nanjing 211171, China)

  • Decai Tang

    (School of Management Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China)

Abstract

With the rapid increase of market competition pressure, enterprises’ collaborative innovation plays a more prominent role in competitive advantage. This paper aims to explore how the enterprise–science community can achieve sustainable collaborative value co-creation. Taking the Maoduoli Group as a sample, using the single case study method and grounded theory, a structural model of the enterprise–science community collaborative value co-creation mechanism is constructed. The proposed model is based on the value logic of “advocating value—creating value—delivering value—acquiring value”, which explains how the enterprise–scientific community collaborative value co-creation model is formed, how it is implemented, how it is delivered to customers, and the overall process of jointly harvesting value at last. The findings are as follows: First, government support, market demand, and entrepreneurial spirit are the internal and external factors for the enterprise–science community to develop collaborative value co-creation; secondly, the synergy mechanism of the enterprise–science community is to realize mutual activities such as joint research and development, a joint publication of papers, sharing of research results, joint research and development activities, and joint teaching practice through means of capital investment, concept support, and technical support. Third, the synergy mechanism of the enterprise–science community can realize the value of the economic and scientific research and the ecological and social benefits (narrow sense), and continuously feed back to further promote a deeper level of collaborative value co-creation of the enterprise–science community. This paper introduces the dimension of the scientific community, forms a special construct, and focuses on the collaborative value co-creation model of the enterprise–scientific community, which fills the gap in this research direction, and also provides theoretical support and practical guidance for the collaborative value co-creation model of the enterprise–scientific community.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenwen Shen & Yuankun Nie & Chao Long & Zibo Song & Qian Zhang & Decai Tang, 2022. "Research on the Mechanism of Collaborative Value Co-Creation of Enterprise–Science Community: A Case Study Based on the Green Brand Maoduoli," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-19, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:15439-:d:978992
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/15439/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/15439/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pera, Rebecca & Occhiocupo, Nicoletta & Clarke, Jackie, 2016. "Motives and resources for value co-creation in a multi-stakeholder ecosystem: A managerial perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 4033-4041.
    2. Ping Zhou & Robert Tijssen & Loet Leydesdorff, 2016. "University-Industry Collaboration in China and the USA: A Bibliometric Comparison," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Nebojša Stojčić, 2021. "Collaborative innovation in emerging innovation systems: Evidence from Central and Eastern Europe," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 531-562, April.
    4. Saïd Yami & André Nemeh, 2014. "Organizing coopetition for innovation: The case of wireless telecommunication sector in Europe," Post-Print hal-02049456, HAL.
    5. H. Igor Ansoff, 1980. "Strategic issue management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 1(2), pages 131-148, April.
    6. Giuditta Prato & Daniel Nepelski, 2014. "Global technological collaboration network: network analysis of international co-inventions," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 39(3), pages 358-375, June.
    7. Tether, Bruce S., 2002. "Who co-operates for innovation, and why: An empirical analysis," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 947-967, August.
    8. Jonathan Adams, 2013. "The fourth age of research," Nature, Nature, vol. 497(7451), pages 557-560, May.
    9. Stephen L. Vargo & Robert F. Lusch, 2016. "Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 5-23, January.
    10. Kumar Rakesh Ranjan & Stuart Read, 2016. "Value co-creation: concept and measurement," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 290-315, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shi Yin & Yudan Zhao, 2024. "Digital green value co-creation behavior, digital green network embedding and digital green innovation performance: moderating effects of digital green network fragmentation," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Nikolay Sterev & Kostadin Kostadinov & Daniel Yordanov & Tsvetelina Yorgova, 2023. "Open Entrepreneurial Academic Centres," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 4, pages 116-134.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ratten, Vanessa & da Silva Braga, Vitor Lélio & da Encarnação Marques, Carla Susana, 2021. "Sport entrepreneurship and value co-creation in times of crisis: The covid-19 pandemic," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 265-274.
    2. He Huang, 2019. "How Does Information Transmission Influence the Value Creation Capability of a Digital Ecosystem? An Empirical Study of the Crypto-Digital Ecosystem Ethereum," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-16, September.
    3. Anthony Okoeguale, 2023. "Brand Value Co-creation Revisited: A Critical Review of Studies," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 12, March.
    4. Severin Oesterle & Arne Buchwald & Nils Urbach, 2022. "Investigating the co-creation of IT consulting service value: empirical findings of a matched pair analysis," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 571-597, June.
    5. Xiaodong Bai, 2024. "Unveiling the Impact of Value Propositions on Value Creation in Chinese Health Service Enterprises: A Customer Participation Perspective," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 38(1), pages 1-17.
    6. Razmdoost, Kamran & Alinaghian, Leila & Smyth, Hedley J., 2019. "Multiplex value cocreation in unique service exchanges," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 277-286.
    7. Nathalie Peña-García & Mauricio Losada-Otálora & Jorge Juliao-Rossi & Augusto Rodríguez-Orejuela, 2021. "Co-Creation of Value and Customer Experience: An Application in Online Banking," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-14, September.
    8. Ivan Fedorenko & Pierre Berthon, 2017. "Beyond the expected benefits: unpacking value co-creation in crowdsourcing business models," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 7(3), pages 183-194, December.
    9. Felicitas Evangelista & Maria Estela Varua & Vivienne Saverimuttu & Rina Datt & Hugh Pattinson & Karina Wardle & Anna Evangelista, 2022. "Antecedents and Outcomes of Service Co-Creation in the Sharing Economy," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    10. Benedict G. C. Dellaert, 2019. "The consumer production journey: marketing to consumers as co-producers in the sharing economy," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 238-254, March.
    11. Ritala, Paavo & Huizingh, Eelko & Almpanopoulou, Argyro & Wijbenga, Paul, 2017. "Tensions in R&D networks: Implications for knowledge search and integration," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 311-322.
    12. Roy, Sanjit Kumar & Balaji, M.S. & Soutar, Geoff & Lassar, Walfried M. & Roy, Rajat, 2018. "Customer engagement behavior in individualistic and collectivistic markets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 281-290.
    13. Corbo, Leonardo & Kraus, Sascha & Vlačić, Božidar & Dabić, Marina & Caputo, Andrea & Pellegrini, Massimiliano M., 2023. "Coopetition and innovation: A review and research agenda," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    14. Wentian Shi & Wenlong Yang & Debin Du, 2020. "The Scientific Cooperation Network of Chinese Scientists and Its Proximity Mechanism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, January.
    15. Anne-Sophie Fernandez & Frédéric Le Roy, 2016. "Why firms implement Coopetitive-Project Teams?," Post-Print hal-02101071, HAL.
    16. Kazem Haki & Michael Blaschke & Stephan Aier & Robert Winter, 2019. "A Value Co-creation Perspective on Information Systems Analysis and Design," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 61(4), pages 487-502, August.
    17. Haoyu Liu & Kim Hua Tan & Xianfeng Wu, 2023. "Who’s watching? Classifying sports viewers on social live streaming services," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(1), pages 743-765, June.
    18. Haoyu Liu & Kim Hua Tan & Ajay Kumar & Sanjay Kumar Singh & Leanne Chung, 2022. "Value Co-creation in Sports Live Streaming Platforms : A Microfoundations Perspective," Post-Print hal-04325652, HAL.
    19. XinMei Ye & Hira Batool & Shi-Zheng Huang, 2023. "The effect of e-commerce livestreaming services on customer loyalty: a test of the chain mediation model," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, December.
    20. Linda D. Hollebeek & Moira K. Clark & Wafa Hammedi & René Arvola, 2021. "Cocreated brand value: theoretical model and propositions," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(4), pages 413-428, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:15439-:d:978992. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.