IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2022i1p411-d1016124.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Employees’ Resources, Demands and Health While Working from Home during COVID-19 Pandemic—A Qualitative Study in the Public Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Seinsche

    (Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science (IMVR), Faculty of Human Sciences and Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Eupener Str. 129, 50933 Cologne, Germany)

  • Kristina Schubin

    (Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science (IMVR), Faculty of Human Sciences and Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Eupener Str. 129, 50933 Cologne, Germany)

  • Jana Neumann

    (Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science (IMVR), Faculty of Human Sciences and Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Eupener Str. 129, 50933 Cologne, Germany)

  • Holger Pfaff

    (Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science (IMVR), Faculty of Human Sciences and Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Eupener Str. 129, 50933 Cologne, Germany)

Abstract

(1) Background: The COVID-19 pandemic changed the working environment in Europe in March 2020, leading to an increase in working from home. In the German public sector, many employees experienced working from home for the first time. Despite the impact on employees’ daily working life, we know little about employees’ resources, demands and health while working from home. The aim of this study is to investigate how working from home is implemented in the public sector one year after the COVID-19 outbreak. In line with the job demand–resources model by Bakker and Demerouti (2007), potential resources, demands and health benefits of working from home are explored. (2) Methods: Semi-structured qualitative telephone interviews were conducted with twelve employees from different public sectors in Germany between December 2021 and February 2022. The semi-structured interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim, and the data was content-analyzed. (3) Results: Employees reported that personal resources, job autonomy, work task, collaboration, leadership, offers by the agency, work environment and equipment served as resources to buffer physical, social, psychological and organizational demands. (4) Conclusions: The research highlights job resources, job demands and potential health impacts of working from home in the public service. Furthermore, the study shows possible starting points for dealing with the health risks of working from home in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Seinsche & Kristina Schubin & Jana Neumann & Holger Pfaff, 2022. "Employees’ Resources, Demands and Health While Working from Home during COVID-19 Pandemic—A Qualitative Study in the Public Sector," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-22, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:411-:d:1016124
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/411/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/411/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bonin, Holger & Eichhorst, Werner & Kaczynska, Jennifer & Kümmerling, Angelika & Rinne, Ulf & Scholten, Annika & Steffes, Susanne, 2020. "Verbreitung und Auswirkungen von mobiler Arbeit und Homeoffice," IZA Research Reports 99, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Christine Ipsen & Marc van Veldhoven & Kathrin Kirchner & John Paulin Hansen, 2021. "Six Key Advantages and Disadvantages of Working from Home in Europe during COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-17, February.
    3. Kunze, Florian & Hampel, Kilian & Zimmermann, Sophia, 2020. "Working from home in the Coronavirus crisis: Towards a transformation of work environments? [Homeoffice in der Corona-Krise – eine nachhaltige Transformation der Arbeitswelt?]," Policy Papers 02, University of Konstanz, Cluster of Excellence "The Politics of Inequality. Perceptions, Participation and Policies".
    4. Deborah Agostino & Michela Arnaboldi & Melisa Diaz Lema, 2021. "New development: COVID-19 as an accelerator of digital transformation in public service delivery," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(1), pages 69-72, January.
    5. Sue Williamson & Linda Colley & Meraiah Foley, 2022. "Public servants working from home: Exploring managers’ changing allowance decisions in a COVID-19 context," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 33(1), pages 37-55, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khogali Hind, 2022. "Saudi Vision 2030: Applying a Sustainable Smart Techno-Cultural Assessment Method to Evaluate Museums’ Performance Post-COVID-19," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(3), pages 1-46, May.
    2. Elena Bonel & Mauro Capestro & Eleonora Di Maria, 2023. "How COVID-19 impacted cultural consumption: an explorative analysis of Gen Z’s digital museum experiences," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2023(2), pages 135-160, June.
    3. Vij, Akshay & Souza, Flavio F. & Barrie, Helen & Anilan, V. & Sarmiento, Sergio & Washington, Lynette, 2023. "Employee preferences for working from home in Australia," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 782-800.
    4. Jianying Xiao & Lixin Han & Hui Zhang, 2022. "Exploring Driving Factors of Digital Transformation among Local Governments: Foundations for Smart City Construction in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    5. Stefania Angela Di Fusco & Antonella Spinelli & Lorenzo Castello & Edoardo Mocini & Michele Massimo Gulizia & Fabrizio Oliva & Domenico Gabrielli & Giuseppe Imperoli & Furio Colivicchi, 2021. "Impact of Working from Home on Cardiovascular Health: An Emerging Issue with the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-12, November.
    6. Ruixin Su & Bojan Obrenovic & Jianguo Du & Danijela Godinic & Akmal Khudaykulov, 2022. "COVID-19 Pandemic Implications for Corporate Sustainability and Society: A Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-23, January.
    7. Christian Kagerl & Julia Starzetz, 2023. "Working from home for good? Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic and what this means for the future of work," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(1), pages 229-265, January.
    8. Pelly, Diane & Daly, Michael & Delaney, Liam & Doyle, Orla, 2022. "Worker stress, burnout, and wellbeing before and during the COVID-19 restrictions in the United Kingdom," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 115098, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Flemming, Jana, 2023. "Folgen der Ausweitung mobiler Arbeit für die betriebliche Mitbestimmung: Thesen und Handlungsempfehlungen für die kollektive Interessenvertretung im Zuge einer zugespitzten Flexibilisierung der Arbeit," Discussion Papers, Research Group Globalization, Work, and Production SP III 2023-301, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    10. Alessandra Falco & Damiano Girardi & Achim Elfering & Tanja Peric & Isabella Pividori & Laura Dal Corso, 2023. "Is Smart Working Beneficial for Workers’ Wellbeing? A Longitudinal Investigation of Smart Working, Workload, and Hair Cortisol/Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfate during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(13), pages 1-23, June.
    11. Malou Grubben & Sara Wiertsema & Remco Hoekman & Gerbert Kraaykamp, 2022. "Is Working from Home during COVID-19 Associated with Increased Sports Participation? Contexts of Sports, Sports Location and Socioeconomic Inequality," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-12, August.
    12. Paweł Ziemba & Mateusz Piwowarski & Kesra Nermend, 2023. "Remote Work in Post-Pandemic Reality—Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Teleconferencing Software," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, June.
    13. Anca Antoaneta Vărzaru, 2022. "An Empirical Framework for Assessing the Balanced Scorecard Impact on Sustainable Development in Healthcare Performance Measurement," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-17, November.
    14. Olena Liakh, 2021. "Accountability through Sustainability Data Governance: Reconfiguring Reporting to Better Account for the Digital Acceleration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-18, December.
    15. Iva Durakovic & Laurie Aznavoorian & Christhina Candido, 2022. "Togetherness and (work)Place: Insights from Workers and Managers during Australian COVID-Induced Lockdowns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-31, December.
    16. Ayoub Ouboumlik, 2024. "Die digitale Transformation der öffentlichen Verwaltung: Eine systematische Literaturübersicht [The digital transformation of public administration: A systematic literature review]," Post-Print hal-04677269, HAL.
    17. Fiona Niebuhr & Prem Borle & Franziska Börner-Zobel & Susanne Voelter-Mahlknecht, 2022. "Healthy and Happy Working from Home? Effects of Working from Home on Employee Health and Job Satisfaction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-14, January.
    18. Gabler, Janos & Raabe, Tobias & Röhrl, Klara & Gaudecker, Hans-Martin von, 2021. "Der Effekt von Homeoffice auf die Entwicklung der Covid-19-Pandemie in Deutschland," IZA Standpunkte 100, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    19. Jentjens, Sabine & Cherbib, Jihène, 2023. "Trust me if you can – Do trust propensities in granting working-from-home arrangements change during times of exogenous shocks?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    20. Ka Po Wong & Fion Choi Hung Lee & Pei-Lee Teh & Alan Hoi Shou Chan, 2021. "The Interplay of Socioecological Determinants of Work–Life Balance, Subjective Wellbeing and Employee Wellbeing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-24, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:411-:d:1016124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.