IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i6p3183-d766589.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Concrete Paving Slabs for Comfort of Movement of Mobility-Impaired Pedestrians—A Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Magdalena Wojnowska-Heciak

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, Institute of Environmental Engineering, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW, ul. Nowoursynowska 166, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Jakub Heciak

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Kielce University of Technology, al. Tysiąclecia Państwa Polskiego 7, 25-314 Kielce, Poland)

  • Adam Kłak

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Kielce University of Technology, al. Tysiąclecia Państwa Polskiego 7, 25-314 Kielce, Poland)

Abstract

People with locomotion difficulties encounter many barriers in a pedestrian environment. Pavement quality has been shown to substantially affect pedestrian satisfaction in general, and its optimal design may contribute to reducing the stigma put on people with impairments. Our research involved a survey assessing perception and attitudes towards pavement quality and characteristics for pedestrian comfort. The classic correlation of the variables based on contingency tables was used to analyse data and to test whether respondents’ perceptions depended on certain profile features. The completion of the statistical inference was the use of advanced algorithms of the correspondence analysis method. The relationships between the variables were assessed optionally using the chi 2 test. The study results revealed desirable parameters and features of paving surfaces. People who use manual wheelchairs and declare limb loss prefer medium- and large-format concrete pavers with smooth finishing and no bevelling. People with skeletal abnormalities or peripheral neuropathy prefer concrete slabs and surfaces made of small- or medium-sized panels arranged in a regular pattern, made of smooth non-slip concrete with narrow joints. Further laboratory tests are necessary to investigate whether increased water permeability of pavements constructed on eco-friendly base layers can curb damage to the pavement surface and provide long-term durability.

Suggested Citation

  • Magdalena Wojnowska-Heciak & Jakub Heciak & Adam Kłak, 2022. "Concrete Paving Slabs for Comfort of Movement of Mobility-Impaired Pedestrians—A Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-17, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:6:p:3183-:d:766589
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/6/3183/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/6/3183/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Magdalena Wojnowska-Heciak & Marzena Suchocka & Magdalena Błaszczyk & Magdalena Muszyńska, 2022. "Urban Parks as Perceived by City Residents with Mobility Difficulties: A Qualitative Study with In-Depth Interviews," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-19, February.
    2. M. O. Hill, 1974. "Correspondence Analysis: A Neglected Multivariate Method," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 23(3), pages 340-354, November.
    3. Green, Sara E., 2003. ""What do you mean 'what's wrong with her?'": stigma and the lives of families of children with disabilities," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 57(8), pages 1361-1374, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Diane Duffy & adolfo Quiroz, 1991. "A permutation-based algorithm for block clustering," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 8(1), pages 65-91, January.
    2. Blasius, J. & Greenacre, M. & Groenen, P.J.F. & van de Velden, M., 2009. "Special issue on correspondence analysis and related methods," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(8), pages 3103-3106, June.
    3. Dawn Iacobucci & Doug Grisaffe, 2018. "Perceptual maps via enhanced correspondence analysis: representing confidence regions to clarify brand positions," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(3), pages 72-83, September.
    4. Jens Dangschat & Jorg Blasius, 1987. "Social and Spatial Disparities in Warsaw in 1978: An Application of Correspondence Analysis to a 'Socialist' City," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 24(3), pages 173-191, June.
    5. Shuangshuang Liu & Qipeng Liao & Mingzhu Xiao & Dengyue Zhao & Chunbo Huang, 2022. "Spatial and Temporal Variations of Habitat Quality and Its Response of Landscape Dynamic in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-20, March.
    6. Davis, Jenny L. & Goar, Carla & Manago, Bianca & Reidinger, Bobbi, 2018. "Distribution and disavowal: Managing the parental stigma of Children's weight and weight loss," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 61-69.
    7. Leiter, Valerie, 2007. ""Nobody's just normal, you know": The social creation of developmental disability," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(8), pages 1630-1641, October.
    8. Mabel Oti-Boadi, 2017. "Exploring the Lived Experiences of Mothers of Children With Intellectual Disability in Ghana," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(4), pages 21582440177, December.
    9. Michael Greenacre, 2006. "Tying up the loose ends in simple correspondence analysis," Economics Working Papers 940, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    10. Jinding Xing & Kunhui Ye & Jian Zuo & Weiyan Jiang, 2018. "Control Dust Pollution on Construction Sites: What Governments Do in China?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-17, August.
    11. Jean-Francois Trani & Kyle A. Pitzer & Juanita Vasquez Escallon & Parul Bakhshi, 2022. "Access to Services from Persons with Disabilities in Afghanistan: Is Community Based Rehabilitation Making a Difference?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-26, May.
    12. Hui, Francis K.C., 2017. "Model-based simultaneous clustering and ordination of multivariate abundance data in ecology," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 1-10.
    13. Alexis Conides & Costantinos Bogdanos & Aristidis Diapoulis, 1998. "Seasonal ecological variations of phyto- and zoobenthic communities in the south of Nisyros Island, Greece," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 109-127, June.
    14. Mendes, Álvaro & Sousa, Liliana & Sequeiros, Jorge & Clarke, Angus, 2017. "Discredited legacy: Stigma and familial amyloid polyneuropathy in Northwestern Portugal," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 73-80.
    15. Donkor, Ernestina S. & Sandall, Jane, 2007. "The impact of perceived stigma and mediating social factors on infertility-related stress among women seeking infertility treatment in Southern Ghana," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(8), pages 1683-1694, October.
    16. Frank Tian-Fang Ye & Kuen-Fung Sin & Xiaozi Gao, 2021. "Subjective Well-Being among Parents of Children with Special Educational Needs in Hong Kong: Impacts of Stigmatized Identity and Discrimination under Social Unrest and COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-13, December.
    17. Konrad Żukiewicz & Agnieszka Dudziak & Tomasz Słowik & Jacek Mazur & Patrycja Łusiak, 2022. "Analysis of the Problem of Waste in Relation to Food Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-20, September.
    18. Francois Bonnieux & Pierre Dupraz, 1998. "Multi criteria analysis of CPs," Post-Print hal-01600139, HAL.
    19. O. Holuša, 2007. "Composition of psocid taxocenoses (Insecta: Psocoptera) in Fageti-Piceeta s. lat. and Piceeta s. lat. forests in the Western Carpathian Mts," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 53(SpecialIs), pages 3-10.
    20. Ziqian Bao & Yihang Bai & Tao Geng, 2023. "Examining Spatial Inequalities in Public Green Space Accessibility: A Focus on Disadvantaged Groups in England," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-22, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:6:p:3183-:d:766589. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.