IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i4p2018-d746946.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban Parks as Perceived by City Residents with Mobility Difficulties: A Qualitative Study with In-Depth Interviews

Author

Listed:
  • Magdalena Wojnowska-Heciak

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, Institute of Environmental Engineering, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Marzena Suchocka

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, Institute of Environmental Engineering, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Magdalena Błaszczyk

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, Institute of Environmental Engineering, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Magdalena Muszyńska

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, Institute of Environmental Engineering, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

Urban green spaces make an invaluable contribution to the health and well-being of all city residents. Therefore, urban park quality and accessibility are crucial factors in stimulating physical and mental health benefits. This study aimed to assess the quality of urban parks and their accessibility as reported by people with mobility difficulties (seniors, blind and partially sighted people). Four key features of a place (accessibility and linkages, comfort and image, uses and activities and sociability) were considered in an in-depth-interviews (IDI) and “walk-and-talk” interviews. Study results indicate a problem of accessibility of urban parks for people with mobility difficulties (uneven gravel surfaces). However, non-physical aspects of park visits (social activities, cultural events, place branding) were reported as essential factors in explaining the motivation for park visits. Despite individual preferences, experience or reported difficulties, all respondents’ attitudes towards park trips were positive. Therefore, we assume that accessibility is more than just physical comfort. Cultural and social activities play an important role in motivating people with a disability to visit a park.

Suggested Citation

  • Magdalena Wojnowska-Heciak & Marzena Suchocka & Magdalena Błaszczyk & Magdalena Muszyńska, 2022. "Urban Parks as Perceived by City Residents with Mobility Difficulties: A Qualitative Study with In-Depth Interviews," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-19, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:4:p:2018-:d:746946
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/4/2018/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/4/2018/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zenker, Sebastian & Braun, Erik & Petersen, Sibylle, 2017. "Branding the destination versus the place: The effects of brand complexity and identification for residents and visitors," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 15-27.
    2. Marzena Suchocka & Paweł Jankowski & Magdalena Błaszczyk, 2019. "Perception of Urban Trees by Polish Tree Professionals vs. Nonprofessionals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, January.
    3. Taylor, Zbigniew & Józefowicz, Iwona, 2012. "Intra-urban daily mobility of disabled people for recreational and leisure purposes," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 155-172.
    4. Magdalena Wojnowska-Heciak, 2019. "The Naturalness of the Vistula Riverbank’s Landscape: Warsaw Inhabitants’ Perceptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-28, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ziqian Bao & Yihang Bai & Tao Geng, 2023. "Examining Spatial Inequalities in Public Green Space Accessibility: A Focus on Disadvantaged Groups in England," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-22, September.
    2. Courtney Glass & Claire Flemmer, 2024. "Evaluating the Accessibility and Inclusiveness of Community Playgrounds in Australia for Children with Disabilities," Disabilities, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-10, November.
    3. Magdalena Wojnowska-Heciak & Jakub Heciak & Adam Kłak, 2022. "Concrete Paving Slabs for Comfort of Movement of Mobility-Impaired Pedestrians—A Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-17, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Siwarit Pongsakornrungsilp & Pimlapas Pongsakornrungsilp & Theeranuch Pusaksrikit & Pimmada Wichasin & Vikas Kumar, 2021. "Co-Creating a Sustainable Regional Brand from Multiple Sub-Brands: The Andaman Tourism Cluster of Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-23, August.
    2. Hui, Ling Chui & Jim, C.Y., 2022. "Urban-greenery demands are affected by perceptions of ecosystem services and disservices, and socio-demographic and environmental-cultural factors," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    3. Anwar Sadat Shimul, 2022. "Brand attachment: a review and future research," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(4), pages 400-419, July.
    4. Tedds, Lindsay M. & Cameron, Anna & Khanal, Mukesh & Crisan, Daria, 2021. "Why Existing Regulatory Frameworks Fail in the Short-term Rental Market: Exploring the Role of Regulatory Fractures," MPRA Paper 106712, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Kwon, Kihyun & Akar, Gulsah, 2022. "People with disabilities and use of public transit: The role of neighborhood walkability," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    6. Marija Opačak & Erda Wang, 2019. "Estimating Willingness to Pay for a Future Recreational Park Atop the Current Jakuševec Landfill in Zagreb, Croatia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-16, October.
    7. Ralf Buckley & Mary-Ann Cooper, 2021. "Assortative Matching of Tourists and Destinations: Agents or Algorithms?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-10, February.
    8. Aleksey A. Nikitin* & Tatyana I. Nikitina & Bulat I. Yakupov, 2018. "Geo-branding: Way from Image of the Territory to a Full-Measured Construct," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 133-136:5.
    9. Chandra Setiawan & Bryna Meivitawanli & Mary-Paz Arrieta-Paredes & Alastair M. Morrison & J. Andres Coca-Stefaniak, 2021. "Friendly Locals and Clean Streets?—Evaluating Jakarta’s Destination Brand Image," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-15, July.
    10. Strandberg, Carola & Styvén, Maria Ek & Hultman, Magnus, 2020. "Places in good graces: The role of emotional connections to a place on word-of-mouth," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 444-452.
    11. Navin Kumar & Rajeev Kumar Panda, 2019. "Place branding and place marketing: a contemporary analysis of the literature and usage of terminology," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 16(2), pages 255-292, December.
    12. Chung-Shing Chan, 2023. "From the perspective of local brand equity, how do citizens perceive green, creative and smart brand potential of future Hong Kong?," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(4), pages 500-513, December.
    13. Renaud Vuignier, 2018. "Attracting Investments and Companies: Federal Multi-Level Collaboration in Switzerland and Canada," Journal of International Commerce, Economics and Policy (JICEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 9(03), pages 1-30, October.
    14. Davood Ghorbanzadeh & K. D. V. Prasad & Natalia Alekseevna Prodanova & Iskandar Muda & Joko Suryono & Nafisa Yuldasheva, 2024. "Exploration of the concept of brand love in city branding: antecedents and consequences," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(2), pages 142-156, June.
    15. Jasper Eshuis & Erik Braun & Erik Hans Klijn & Sebastian Zenker, 2018. "The differential effect of various stakeholder groups in place marketing," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(5), pages 916-936, August.
    16. Saikat Banerjee, 2021. "Factors impacting state branding communication success: a mediating and multigroup analysis," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(4), pages 317-335, December.
    17. Menna Tudwal Jones, 2019. "Framing regeneration: Embracing the inhabitants," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(9), pages 1901-1917, July.
    18. David Amani & Esther Ernest Mfumbilwa, 2024. "Destination Promotion Videos and Tourism Knowledge: A Road Toward Residents’ Empowerment in Emerging Tourism Destinations," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, September.
    19. Maczka, Krzysztof & Matczak, Piotr & Mielewczyk, Marcin & Przewoźna, Patrycja & Inglot, Adam & Wężyk, Piotr & Zięba-Kulawik, Karolina & Hawryło, Paweł, 2023. "Narratives on cutting down trees on private land. A comparison of urban and rural municipalities in Poland using the Q-deliberation method," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    20. Edison Jair Duque Oliva & Javier A. Sánchez-Torres, 2023. "Building a University City Brand: Colombian University Students’ Perceptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-24, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:4:p:2018-:d:746946. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.