IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01600139.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Multi criteria analysis of CPs

Author

Listed:
  • Francois Bonnieux

    (Unité d'économie et sociologie rurales de rennes - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique)

  • Pierre Dupraz

    (SMART-LERECO - Structures et Marché Agricoles, Ressources et Territoires - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - AGROCAMPUS OUEST)

Abstract

This discussion document provides the partners a comprehensive set of results on Task 8. This document should be the main input to prepare the final report on this task. It is organised into four chapters and annexes. The first chapters reviews the underlying principles of cost-benefit analysis and considers the issue of environmental indicators. Due to the theoretical and practical difficulties a multi-criteria analysis is finally developed. It is founded on a series of indicators whose values are derived from the results of the other taks. They are defined in Chapter 2. The data set includes a number of policies which ara analyse in Chapter 3. Some indicators are quantitative and some are purely qualitative so to deal with this information the multi-correspondance analysis has been used. The basic philosophy is to reduce dimension in order to reveal relationships among the CSPs, among the indicators and between the CSPs and the indicators. It is found that six factors give an adequate approximation to the original data set. These factors are easily interpreted and are used in Chapter 4 to classify CSPs according to eight groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Francois Bonnieux & Pierre Dupraz, 1998. "Multi criteria analysis of CPs," Post-Print hal-01600139, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01600139
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01600139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01600139/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Just, Richard E & Antle, John M, 1990. "Interactions between Agricultural and Environmental Policies: A Conceptual Framework," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 80(2), pages 197-202, May.
    2. Abler, David G & Shortle, James S, 1992. "Environmental and Farm Commodity Policy Linkages in the U.S. and the EC," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 19(2), pages 197-217.
    3. Adger, Neil & Whitby, Martin, 1991. "Accounting for the impact of agriculture and forestry on environmental quality," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(2-3), pages 629-641, April.
    4. M. O. Hill, 1974. "Correspondence Analysis: A Neglected Multivariate Method," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 23(3), pages 340-354, November.
    5. Nicolaas W. Bouwes & Robert Schneider, 1979. "Procedures in Estimating Benefits of Water Quality Change," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 61(3), pages 535-539.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, JunJie & Zilberman, David & Babcock, Bruce A., 2001. "Environmental and Distributional Impacts of Conservation Targeting Strategies," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 333-350, May.
    2. Fenichel, Eli P. & Horan, Richard D. & Bence, James R., 2010. "Indirect management of invasive species through bio-controls: A bioeconomic model of salmon and alewife in Lake Michigan," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 500-518, November.
    3. John M. Antle & Roberto O. Valdivia, 2006. "Modelling the supply of ecosystem services from agriculture: a minimum‐data approach," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 50(1), pages 1-15, March.
    4. Msangi, Siwa & Howitt, Richard E., 2006. "Estimating Disaggregate Production Functions: An Application to Northern Mexico," 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA 21080, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    5. Betina Dimaranan & Thomas W. Hertel & Roman Keeney, 2003. "OECD Domestic Support and Developing Countries," WIDER Working Paper Series DP2003-32, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    6. P. Ciaian, 2007. "Land use changes in the EU: Policy and macro impact analysis," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 53(12), pages 565-579.
    7. Diane Duffy & adolfo Quiroz, 1991. "A permutation-based algorithm for block clustering," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 8(1), pages 65-91, January.
    8. Blasius, J. & Greenacre, M. & Groenen, P.J.F. & van de Velden, M., 2009. "Special issue on correspondence analysis and related methods," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(8), pages 3103-3106, June.
    9. Dawn Iacobucci & Doug Grisaffe, 2018. "Perceptual maps via enhanced correspondence analysis: representing confidence regions to clarify brand positions," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(3), pages 72-83, September.
    10. Shuangshuang Liu & Qipeng Liao & Mingzhu Xiao & Dengyue Zhao & Chunbo Huang, 2022. "Spatial and Temporal Variations of Habitat Quality and Its Response of Landscape Dynamic in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-20, March.
    11. Werner Hediger, 2003. "Alternative policy measures and farmers' participation to improve rural landscapes and water quality: A conceptual framework," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics (SJES), Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics (SSES), vol. 139(III), pages 333-350, September.
    12. Saunders, Caroline M. & Roningen, Vernon O., 2001. "Trade And The Environment. Linking A Partial Equilibrium Trade Model With Production Systems And Their Environmental Consequences," 2001: International Trade in Livestock Products Symposium, January 2001, Auckland, New Zealand 14552, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    13. Bonham, John G. & Bosch, Darrell J. & Pease, James W., 2006. "Cost-Effectiveness of Nutrient Management and Buffers: Comparisons of Two Spatial Scenarios," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 38(1), pages 17-32, April.
    14. Peter Walkenhorst, 2004. "Domestic And International Environmental Impacts Of Agricultural Trade Liberalisation," International Trade 0401010, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Abrahams, Nii Adote & Shortle, James S., 1997. "Uncertainty And The Regulation Of Nitrate Pollution From Agriculture," 1997 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Toronto, Canada 21027, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    16. John M. Antle & Susan M. Capalbo, 2001. "Econometric-Process Models for Integrated Assessment of Agricultural Production Systems," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 83(2), pages 389-401.
    17. Jinding Xing & Kunhui Ye & Jian Zuo & Weiyan Jiang, 2018. "Control Dust Pollution on Construction Sites: What Governments Do in China?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-17, August.
    18. Elsa Martin & Hubert Stahn, 2013. "Potential Conflict and Inefficiencies Arising in Agri-environmental Management," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(2), pages 423-445, June.
    19. Horan, Richard D. & Lupi, Frank, 2005. "Economic Incentives for Controlling Trade-Related Biological Invasions in the Great Lakes," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 34(1), pages 75-89, April.
    20. Just, Richard E., 2000. "Some Guiding Principles For Empirical Production Research In Agriculture," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 29(2), pages 1-21, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01600139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.