IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i20p13671-d949351.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When It Comes to Screen Golf and Baseball, What Do Participants Think?

Author

Listed:
  • Bo-Hyun Seong

    (Chungbuk Research Institute, Cheongju-si 28517, Chungcheongbuk-do, Korea)

  • Chang-Yu Hong

    (Division of Global and Interdisciplinary Studies, Pukyong National University, Busan 48513, Korea)

Abstract

Screen golf and baseball activities have been popular as virtual game content and sport activities, but no one has cogently explained why they are attractive to Korean urban society. Our research team analyzed the decision-making process for participating in screen golf and baseball through a widely used technology acceptance model (TAM) to explain the relationship between perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, personal attitude, and individual intention. Structural equation modeling (SEM) verified five hypotheses established through a literature review, and 400 effective samples obtained through online surveys provided material for analysis. As a result of the analysis, perceived usefulness was the most important variable leading to participation in virtual reality sports. Based on this finding, we could conclude that the successful popularization of virtual reality sports depends on the development of applications sophisticated enough to provide practical usefulness to participants, such as physical posture correction and an improvement in personal athletic skills.

Suggested Citation

  • Bo-Hyun Seong & Chang-Yu Hong, 2022. "When It Comes to Screen Golf and Baseball, What Do Participants Think?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-15, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:20:p:13671-:d:949351
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/20/13671/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/20/13671/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Madhavan Parthasarathy & Anol Bhattacherjee, 1998. "Understanding Post-Adoption Behavior in the Context of Online Services," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 9(4), pages 362-379, December.
    2. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    3. Chang, Yu-Wei & Chen, Jiahe, 2021. "What motivates customers to shop in smart shops? The impacts of smart technology and technology readiness," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    4. Vandecasteele, Bert & Geuens, Maggie, 2010. "Motivated Consumer Innovativeness: Concept, measurement, and validation," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 308-318.
    5. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    6. Braunsberger, Karin & Wybenga, Hans & Gates, Roger, 2007. "A comparison of reliability between telephone and web-based surveys," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(7), pages 758-764, July.
    7. Tzu-Hao Huang & Fen Liu & Li-Chen Chen & Ching-Ching Tsai, 2021. "The acceptance and impact of Google Classroom integrating into a clinical pathology course for nursing students: A technology acceptance model approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-16, March.
    8. Westmattelmann, Daniel & Grotenhermen, Jan-Gerrit & Sprenger, Marius & Rand, William & Schewe, Gerhard, 2021. "Apart we ride together: The motivations behind users of mixed-reality sports," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 316-328.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bo-Hyun Seong & Chang-Yu Hong, 2022. "Decision-Making in Virtual Reality Sports Games Explained via the Lens of Extended Planned Behavior Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Sameena Naaz & Sarah Ali Khan & Farheen Siddiqui & Shahab Saquib Sohail & Dag Øivind Madsen & Asad Ahmad, 2022. "OdorTAM: Technology Acceptance Model for Biometric Authentication System Using Human Body Odor," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Ji-Hye Kim & Eungoo Kang, 2023. "An Empirical Research: Incorporation of User Innovativeness into TAM and UTAUT in Adopting a Golf App," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-22, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu-Jin Choi & Jin-Woo Park, 2020. "Investigating Factors Influencing the Behavioral Intention of Online Duty-Free Shop Users," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Marzieh Zendehdel & Laily Hj Paim & Syuhaily Bint Osman, 2015. "Students’ online purchasing behavior in Malaysia: Understanding online shopping attitude," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 1078428-107, December.
    3. Shalini Srivastava & Sushama Vishnani, 2021. "Determinants of mobile bank usage among the bank users in North India," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(1), pages 34-51, March.
    4. Abdolrazagh Madahi & Inda Sukati, 2016. "An Empirical Study of Malaysian Consumers’ Channel-switching Intention: Using theory of Planned Behaviour," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 17(3), pages 489-523, June.
    5. Mäntymäki, Matti & Salo, Jari, 2013. "Purchasing behavior in social virtual worlds: An examination of Habbo Hotel," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 282-290.
    6. Fatima Zahra Barrane & Gahima Egide Karuranga & Diane Poulin, 2018. "Technology Adoption and Diffusion: A New Application of the UTAUT Model," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(06), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Joan Torrent-Sellens & Cristian Salazar-Concha & Pilar Ficapal-Cusí & Francesc Saigí-Rubió, 2021. "Using Digital Platforms to Promote Blood Donation: Motivational and Preliminary Evidence from Latin America and Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-17, April.
    8. Alfiero, Simona & Battisti, Enrico & Ηadjielias, Elias, 2022. "Black box technology, usage-based insurance, and prediction of purchase behavior: Evidence from the auto insurance sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    9. Cowan, Kelly R. & Daim, Tugrul U., 2011. "Review of technology acquisition and adoption research in the energy sector," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 183-199.
    10. Chia-Chien Hsu & Brian Sandford & Chia-Ju Ling & Ching-Torng Lin, 2021. "Can the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) Help Explain Subjective Well-Being in Senior Citizens due to Gateball Participation?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-15, August.
    11. Asmussen, Katherine E. & Mondal, Aupal & Bhat, Chandra R., 2022. "Adoption of partially automated vehicle technology features and impacts on vehicle miles of travel (VMT)," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 156-179.
    12. Abu Elnasr E. Sobaih & Ibrahim A. Elshaer, 2023. "Risk-Taking, Financial Knowledge, and Risky Investment Intention: Expanding Theory of Planned Behavior Using a Moderating-Mediating Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, January.
    13. Peter Bou Saba & Régis Meissonier, 2016. "Conflict contagion effects from previous IT projects: action research during preliminary phases of a DST implementation project [Effets de contagion de conflits de projets TI antérieurs:Une recherc," Post-Print hal-02161336, HAL.
    14. Sanjeev Verma, 2015. "Harnessing the Benefit of Social Networking Sites for Intentional Social Action: Determinants and Challenges," Vision, , vol. 19(2), pages 104-111, June.
    15. Queiroz, Maciel M. & Fosso Wamba, Samuel, 2019. "Blockchain adoption challenges in supply chain: An empirical investigation of the main drivers in India and the USA," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 70-82.
    16. Sarv Devaraj & Ming Fan & Rajiv Kohli, 2002. "Antecedents of B2C Channel Satisfaction and Preference: Validating e-Commerce Metrics," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 316-333, September.
    17. Muhammad Ali & Syed Ali Raza & Chin-Hong Puah & Mohd Zaini Abd Karim, 2017. "Islamic home financing in Pakistan: a SEM-based approach using modified TPB model," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(8), pages 1156-1177, November.
    18. Gansser, Oliver Alexander & Reich, Christina Stefanie, 2021. "A new acceptance model for artificial intelligence with extensions to UTAUT2: An empirical study in three segments of application," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    19. Chua Chang Jin & Lim Chee Seong & Aye Aye Khin, 2019. "Factors Affecting the Consumer Acceptance towards Fintech Products and Services in Malaysia," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(1), pages 59-65, January.
    20. Triadi Agung Sudarto & Dodik Juliardi, 2022. "The effect of perceptions on tax evasion and tax sanction on ethical behaviour of accounting student compliance," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(10), pages 206-216, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:20:p:13671-:d:949351. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.