IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i12p7345-d839477.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Virtual Water Flow Pattern in the Yellow River Basin, China: An Analysis Based on a Multiregional Input–Output Model

Author

Listed:
  • Xiuli Liu

    (Research Institute of Resource-Based Economics, Shanxi University of Finance & Economics, Taiyuan 030006, China)

  • Rui Xiong

    (Research Institute of Resource-Based Economics, Shanxi University of Finance & Economics, Taiyuan 030006, China)

  • Pibin Guo

    (Department of Management, Taiyuan University, Taiyuan 030032, China)

  • Lei Nie

    (Research Institute of Resource-Based Economics, Shanxi University of Finance & Economics, Taiyuan 030006, China)

  • Qinqin Shi

    (Research Institute of Resource-Based Economics, Shanxi University of Finance & Economics, Taiyuan 030006, China)

  • Wentao Li

    (Research Institute of Resource-Based Economics, Shanxi University of Finance & Economics, Taiyuan 030006, China)

  • Jing Cui

    (Research Institute of Resource-Based Economics, Shanxi University of Finance & Economics, Taiyuan 030006, China)

Abstract

Research on the Yellow River Basin’s virtual water is not only beneficial for rational water resource regulation and allocation, but it is also a crucial means of relieving the pressures of a shortage of water resources. The water stress index and pull coefficient have been introduced to calculate the implied virtual water from intraregional and interregional trade in the Yellow River Basin on the basis of a multi-regional input–output model; a systematic study of virtual water flow has been conducted. The analysis illustrated that: (1) Agriculture is the leading sector in terms of virtual water input and output among all provinces in the Yellow River Basin, which explains the high usage. Therefore, it is important to note that the agricultural sector needs to improve its water efficiency. In addition to agriculture, virtual water is mainly exported through supply companies in the upper reaches; the middle reaches mainly output services and the transportation industry, and the lower reaches mainly output to the manufacturing industry. Significant differences exist in the pull coefficients of the same sectors in different provinces (regions). The average pull coefficients of the manufacturing, mining, and construction industries are large, so it is necessary to formulate stricter water use policies. (2) The whole basin is in a state of virtual net water input, that is, throughout the region. The Henan, Shandong, Shanxi, Shaanxi, and Qinghai Provinces, which are relatively short of water, import virtual water to relieve local water pressures. However, in the Gansu Province and the Ningxia Autonomous Region, where water resources are not abundant, continuous virtual water output will exacerbate the local resource shortage. (3) The Yellow River Basin’s virtual water resources have obvious geographical distribution characteristics. The cross-provincial trade volume in the downstream area is high; the virtual water trade volume in the upstream area is low, as it is in the midstream and downstream areas; the trade relationship is insufficient. The Henan and Shandong Provinces are located in the dominant flow direction of Yellow River Basin’s virtual water, while Gansu and Inner Mongolia are at the major water sources. Trade exchanges between the midstream and downstream and the upstream should be strengthened. Therefore, the utilization of water resources should be planned nationwide to reduce water pressures, and policymakers should improve the performance of agricultural water use within the Yellow River Basin and change the main trade industries according to the resource advantages and water resources situation of each of them.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiuli Liu & Rui Xiong & Pibin Guo & Lei Nie & Qinqin Shi & Wentao Li & Jing Cui, 2022. "Virtual Water Flow Pattern in the Yellow River Basin, China: An Analysis Based on a Multiregional Input–Output Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-24, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:12:p:7345-:d:839477
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/12/7345/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/12/7345/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ehsan Qasemipour & Farhad Tarahomi & Markus Pahlow & Seyed Saeed Malek Sadati & Ali Abbasi, 2020. "Assessment of Virtual Water Flows in Iran Using a Multi-Regional Input-Output Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Xia, Wenjun & Chen, Xiaohong & Song, Chao & Pérez-Carrera, Alejo, 2022. "Driving factors of virtual water in international grain trade: A study for belt and road countries," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    3. White, David J. & Feng, Kuishuang & Sun, Laixiang & Hubacek, Klaus, 2015. "A hydro-economic MRIO analysis of the Haihe River Basin's water footprint and water stress," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 318(C), pages 157-167.
    4. Yaqing Wang & Chaofan Xian & Yaqiong Jiang & Xuelian Pan & Zhiyun Ouyang, 2020. "Anthropogenic reactive nitrogen releases and gray water footprints in urban water pollution evaluation: the case of Shenzhen City, China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(7), pages 6343-6361, October.
    5. Zhang, Yiyi & Hou, Shengren & Chen, Shaoqing & Long, Huihui & Liu, Jiefeng & Wang, Jiaqi, 2021. "Tracking flows and network dynamics of virtual water in electricity transmission across China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    6. Alexandros Gkatsikos & Konstadinos Mattas, 2021. "The Paradox of the Virtual Water Trade Balance in the Mediterranean Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-14, March.
    7. Gu, Donglin & Guo, Jiahang & Fan, Yurui & Zuo, Qiting & Yu, Lei, 2022. "Evaluating water-energy-food system of Yellow River basin based on type-2 fuzzy sets and Pressure-State-Response model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    8. Sun, J.X. & Yin, Y.L. & Sun, S.K. & Wang, Y.B. & Yu, X. & Yan, K., 2021. "Review on research status of virtual water: The perspective of accounting methods, impact assessment and limitations," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    9. Wang, Xuanxuan & Chen, Yaning & Li, Zhi & Fang, Gonghuan & Wang, Yi, 2020. "Development and utilization of water resources and assessment of water security in Central Asia," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    10. Yang Yang & Shiwei Liu & Cunde Xiao & Cuiyang Feng & Chenyu Li, 2021. "Evaluating Cryospheric Water Withdrawal and Virtual Water Flows in Tarim River Basin of China: An Input–Output Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-16, July.
    11. Cao, Xinchun & Cui, Simeng & Shu, Rui & Wu, Mengyang, 2020. "Misestimation of water saving in agricultural virtual water trade by not considering the role of irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrea Benedek & Tomasz Rokicki & András Szeberényi, 2023. "Bibliometric Evaluation of Energy Efficiency in Agriculture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-27, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Junjie & Yan, Yulong & Wang, Yirong & Zhang, Yifu & Shao, Lianwei & Li, Menggang, 2024. "Spatial-successive transfer of virtual scarcity water along China's coal-based electric chain," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    2. Alexandros Gkatsikos & Konstadinos Mattas, 2021. "The Paradox of the Virtual Water Trade Balance in the Mediterranean Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-14, March.
    3. Ana Luiza Fontenelle & Erik Nilsson & Ieda Geriberto Hidalgo & Cintia B. Uvo & Drielli Peyerl, 2022. "Temporal Understanding of the Water–Energy Nexus: A Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, April.
    4. Wang, Yayu & Muhammad, Tahir & Liu, Zeyuan & Liang, Hongbang & Wang, Xingpeng & Wang, Zhenhua & Ma, Changjian & Li, Yunkai, 2022. "Chelated copper reduces yet manganese fertilizer increases calcium-silica fouling in brackish water drip irrigation systems," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    5. Alexandros Gkatsikos & Dimitrios Natos & Christos Staboulis & Konstadinos Mattas & Michail Tsagris & Apostolos Polymeros, 2022. "An Impact Assessment of the Young Farmers Scheme Policy on Regional Growth in Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-12, March.
    6. Feng, Le & Chen, Bin & Hayat, Tasawar & Alsaedi, Ahmed & Ahmad, Bashir, 2017. "Dynamic forecasting of agricultural water footprint based on Markov Chain-a case study of the Heihe River Basin," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 353(C), pages 150-157.
    7. Guo, Yaoqi & Zhao, Boya & Zhang, Hongwei, 2023. "The impact of the Belt and Road Initiative on the natural gas trade: A network structure dependence perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PD).
    8. Na Qiao & Lan Fang & Lan Mu, 2020. "Evaluating the impacts of water resources technology progress on development and economic growth over the Northwest, China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-14, March.
    9. Hu, Xiaofeng, 2023. "Green economic recovery in Central Asia by utilizing natural resources," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    10. Zhao, Guimei & Li, Wenxiu & Geng, Yong & Bleischwitz, Raimund, 2023. "Uncovering the features of global antimony resource trade network," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    11. Yiyi Zhang & Huanzhi Fu & Xinghua He & Zhen Shi & Tao Hai & Peng Liu & Shan Xi & Kai Zhang, 2023. "Electricity-Related Water Network Analysis in China Based on Multi-Regional Input–Output Analysis and Complex Network Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-20, March.
    12. Liu, Yating & Chen, Bin, 2020. "Water-energy scarcity nexus risk in the national trade system based on multiregional input-output and network environ analyses," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    13. Rastegaripour, Fatemeh & Tavassoli, Abolfazl & Babaeian, Mahdi & Fernández-Gálvez, Jesús & Caballero-Calvo, Andrés, 2024. "Assessing the impacts of climate change on water resource management and crop patterns in Eastern Iran," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    14. Gino Sturla & Lorenzo Ciulla & Benedetto Rocchi, 2022. "Italy's Volumetric, Scarce and Social-scarce water footprint: a Hydro Economic Input-Output Analysis," Working Papers - Economics wp2022_17.rdf, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa.
    15. Eamen, Leila & Brouwer, Roy & Razavi, Saman, 2020. "The economic impacts of water supply restrictions due to climate and policy change: A transboundary river basin supply-side input-output analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    16. Sun, Yuanyuan & Mao, Xianqiang & Liu, Gengyuan & Yin, Xinan & Zhao, Yanwei, 2020. "Modelling the effects of energy taxes on ecological footprint transfers in China's foreign trade," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 431(C).
    17. Qiangyi Li & Lan Yang & Fangxin Jiang & Yangqing Liu & Chenyang Guo & Shuya Han, 2022. "Distribution Characteristics, Regional Differences and Spatial Convergence of the Water-Energy-Land-Food Nexus: A Case Study of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-28, September.
    18. Jin, Xuanyi & Jiang, Wenrui & Fang, Delin & Wang, Saige & Chen, Bin, 2024. "Evaluation and driving force analysis of the water-energy‑carbon nexus in agricultural trade for RCEP countries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 353(PB).
    19. Xu, Aokang & Hu, Mengjun & Shi, Jing & Bai, Qingzhu & Li, Xuehong, 2024. "Construction and optimization of ecological network in inland river basin based on circuit theory, complex network and ecological sensitivity: A case study of Gansu section of Heihe River Basin," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 488(C).
    20. Zhipeng Wang & Ershen Zhang & Guojun Chen, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Variation and Influencing Factors of Grain Yield in Major Grain-Producing Counties: A Comparative Study of Two Provinces from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-30, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:12:p:7345-:d:839477. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.