IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i11p6621-d827078.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predictive Utility of Composite Child Feeding Indices (CCFIs) for Child Nutritional Status: Comparative Analyses for the Most Suitable Formula for Constructing an Optimum CCFI

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen Kofi Anin

    (School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstraße 25, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany
    Department of Industrial and Health Sciences, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Takoradi Technical University, Takoradi P.O. Box 256, Ghana)

  • Richard Stephen Ansong

    (Department of Nutrition and Food Science, University of Ghana, Accra P.O. Box LG 134, Ghana)

  • Florian Fischer

    (Institute of Public Health, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany)

  • Alexander Kraemer

    (School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstraße 25, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany)

Abstract

Composite child feeding indices (CCFIs) developed from various relevant measures of dietary intake by infants and young children have several potential applications in nutritional epidemiological studies for the development and deployment of precise public health nutrition interventions against child undernutrition. The predictive utility of some CCFIs (computed from varying formulation components) for child nutritional status (stunting, wasting, and underweight) were compared. The purpose of the study was to identify the most suitable among them for possible standardization, validation, and adoption by nutritional health researchers. Using cluster sampling, data from 581 mother–child pairs were collected. Multivariable regression analyses were applied to the data obtained through a community-based analytical cross-sectional survey design. Three of the CCFIs were found to be significantly associated with only wasting (WHZ) from the linear regression models after adjusting for potential confounders and/or correlates. None of the CCFIs (whether in the continuous nor categorical form) was consistently predictive of all three measures of child nutritional status, after controlling for potential confounders and/or correlates, irrespective of the choice of regression method. CCFI 5 was constructed using a dimension reduction technique—namely principal component analysis (PCA)—as the most optimal summary index in terms of predictiveness for child wasting status, validity, and reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.80) that captured relevant dimensions of optimal child food intake. The dimension reduction approach that was used in constructing CCFI 5 is recommended for standardization, validation, and possible adoption for wider applicability across heterogeneous population settings as an optimum CCFI usable for nutritional epidemiological studies among children under five years.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen Kofi Anin & Richard Stephen Ansong & Florian Fischer & Alexander Kraemer, 2022. "Predictive Utility of Composite Child Feeding Indices (CCFIs) for Child Nutritional Status: Comparative Analyses for the Most Suitable Formula for Constructing an Optimum CCFI," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-22, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:11:p:6621-:d:827078
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/11/6621/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/11/6621/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Minghua Tang, 2018. "Protein Intake during the First Two Years of Life and Its Association with Growth and Risk of Overweight," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-8, August.
    2. Andrea Serge & Johana Quiroz Montoya & Francisco Alonso & Luis Montoro, 2021. "Socioeconomic Status, Health and Lifestyle Settings as Psychosocial Risk Factors for Road Crashes in Young People: Assessing the Colombian Case," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-22, January.
    3. Ron Johnston & Kelvyn Jones & David Manley, 2018. "Confounding and collinearity in regression analysis: a cautionary tale and an alternative procedure, illustrated by studies of British voting behaviour," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 1957-1976, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hren, Darko & Pina, David G. & Norman, Christopher R. & Marušić, Ana, 2022. "What makes or breaks competitive research proposals? A mixed-methods analysis of research grant evaluation reports," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(2).
    2. Han-Sol Lee & Sergey U. Chernikov & Szabolcs Nagy & Ekaterina A. Degtereva, 2022. "The Impact of National Culture on Innovation: A Comparative Analysis between Developed and Developing Nations during the Pre- and Post-Crisis Period 2007–2021," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-14, November.
    3. Tuyen Quang Tran & Huong Van Vu, 2021. "The impact of land fragmentation on food security in the North Central Coast, Vietnam," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(2), pages 327-345, May.
    4. Joachim P. Hasebrook & Leonie Michalak & Anna Wessels & Sabine Koenig & Stefan Spierling & Stefan Kirmsse, 2022. "Green Behavior: Factors Influencing Behavioral Intention and Actual Environmental Behavior of Employees in the Financial Service Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-35, August.
    5. Flávia dos Santos Barbosa Brito & Emanuela Santos da Costa & Ariane Cristina Thoaldo Romeiro & Debora Martins dos Santos & Alexandre dos Santos Brito & Alessandra Silva Dias de Oliveira & Amanda Rodri, 2024. "Exploring Maternal Socio-Demographic Factors Shaping Children’s Dietary Patterns in Brazil: Results from the 2019 National Health Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(8), pages 1-12, July.
    6. Adam R. Pearson & Guadalupe A. Bacio & Sarah Naiman & Rainer Romero-Canyas & Jonathon P. Schuldt, 2021. "Cultural determinants of climate change opinion: familism predicts climate beliefs and policy support among US Latinos," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 167(1), pages 1-8, July.
    7. Stephen Morse & Nora McNamara & Nancy Nathan & Shuaibu Adamu & Oluwayemisi Idowu Micah & Muhammed Kabir & Augustine Sunday Onwuaroh & Nathaniel Otene, 2023. "The Leveraging of Support by Faith-Based Social Groups in Rural Villages of the Federal Capital Territory, Nigeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-19, September.
    8. Dorceta E. Taylor & Ashley Bell & Destiny Treloar & Ashia Ajani & Marco Alvarez & Tevin Hamilton & Jayson Velazquez & Pwintphyu Nandar & Lily Fillwalk & Kerry J. Ard, 2024. "Defying the Food Desert, Food Swamp, and Supermarket Redlining Stereotypes in Detroit: Comparing the Distribution of Food Outlets in 2013 and 2023," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-59, August.
    9. Arcuri, Maria Cristina & Gandolfi, Gino & Russo, Ivan, 2023. "Does fake news impact stock returns? Evidence from US and EU stock markets," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 125.
    10. Heinrich, Victor, 2023. "Private Equity Transactions: Value Creation through Operational Engineering – Evidence from Europe," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 8(3), pages 634-657.
    11. Mario Gato-Moreno & María F. Martos-Lirio & Isabel Leiva-Gea & M. Rosa Bernal-López & Fernando Vegas-Toro & María C. Fernández-Tenreiro & Juan P. López-Siguero, 2021. "Early Nutritional Education in the Prevention of Childhood Obesity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-10, June.
    12. James Ming Chen & Predrag Bejaković & Nika Šimurina, 2024. "Tax and Policy Drivers of Personal Overindebtedness in the European Union," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 30(2), pages 115-133, May.
    13. Mária Sováriová Soósová & Vladimíra Timková & Lucia Dimunová & Boris Mauer, 2021. "Spirituality as a Mediator Between Depressive Symptoms and Subjective Well-being in Older Adults," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 30(5), pages 707-717, June.
    14. Elisabet Garrido & Claudio Giachetti & Juan P. Maicas, 2023. "Navigating windows of opportunity: The role of international experience," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(8), pages 1911-1938, August.
    15. Daniel A. Griffith & Richard E. Plant, 2022. "Statistical Analysis in the Presence of Spatial Autocorrelation: Selected Sampling Strategy Effects," Stats, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-20, December.
    16. Seigner, Benedikt David Christian & Milanov, Hana & Lundmark, Erik & Shepherd, Dean A., 2023. "Tweeting like Elon? Provocative language, new-venture status, and audience engagement on social media," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 38(2).
    17. Yutaka Fujioka & Norio Kambayashi, 2022. "Learning by teaching technological knowledge: conceptual skill development in Japanese overseas subsidiaries," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(9), pages 1-32, September.
    18. Yang, Xi & Zhao, Quanwu & Sun, Heshan, 2022. "Seekers’ complaint behavior in crowdsourcing: An uncertainty perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    19. Evelyn Agba Tackie & Hao Chen & Isaac Ahakwa & Samuel Atingabili & Kobina Abaka Ansah, 2022. "Investigating the Relationship Between Local Business and Employment Creation for Poverty Reduction in Northern Ghana: The Moderating Role of Local Economic Development (LED) Policy," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, June.
    20. Petersen, Thies & Denker, Tom & Koppenberg, Maximilian & Hirsch, Stefan, 2024. "Meat Substitute Consumption and Political Attitudes – Testing the Left-Right and Environmental Concerns Frameworks," 2024 Annual Meeting, July 28-30, New Orleans, LA 343692, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:11:p:6621-:d:827078. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.