IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i7p3494-d525444.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Responsibility, Sustainability, and Public Policy: The Lessons of Debris Management after the Manabí Earthquake in Ecuador

Author

Listed:
  • Paulina Guerrero-Miranda

    (Facultad de Ciencias Agrícolas, Universidad Central del Ecuador, Ciudadela Universitaria, Av. América y Avda. Universitaria, Quito 170136, Ecuador
    Departamento de Análisis Geográfico Regional y Geografía Física, Universidad de Alicante, Carretera San Vicente del Raspeig s/n, San Vicente del Raspeig, 03690 Alicante, Spain)

  • Arturo Luque González

    (Facultad de Ciencias Humanísticas y Sociales, Universidad Técnica de Manabí UTM, Ave. José María Urbina and Che Guevara, Portoviejo 130105, Ecuador
    Escuela de Administración—Grupo de Investigación en Dirección y Gerencia, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá 111711, Colombia)

Abstract

Natural disasters can generate millions of tons of debris and waste, which has an impact on the environment and poses direct risks to the health of the population, hence the need to analyze public policy and its consequences following the 2016 earthquake in Ecuador. Several in-depth interviews were conducted with individuals active in public service during the post-earthquake management period, together with fieldwork analysis of debris management and the institutional strategies for its recycling and reuse in three of the most affected cities: Pedernales, Portoviejo, and Manta. The environmental impact was examined, including its taxonomy of inconsistencies within public administration, alongside the processes of decentralization and shared decision-making. Similarly, the links between corporate social responsibility (CSR), public policy, and sustainability were analyzed at both the national and local level for their wider implications and ramifications. The study highlighted the gaps in the management of such a crisis, exposing a lack of ethics and the shortcomings of social (ir-)responsibility in the distorted processes of public welfare in the country, aspects that should rather work in concert to achieve full sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Paulina Guerrero-Miranda & Arturo Luque González, 2021. "Social Responsibility, Sustainability, and Public Policy: The Lessons of Debris Management after the Manabí Earthquake in Ecuador," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-15, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:7:p:3494-:d:525444
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/7/3494/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/7/3494/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brown, Charlotte & Milke, Mark, 2016. "Recycling disaster waste: Feasibility, method and effectiveness," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 21-32.
    2. Denhart, Hazel, 2010. "Deconstructing disaster: Economic and environmental impacts of deconstruction in post-Katrina New Orleans," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 194-204.
    3. Arturo Luque & Noelia Herrero‐García, 2019. "How corporate social (ir)responsibility in the textile sector is defined, and its impact on ethical sustainability: An analysis of 133 concepts," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(6), pages 1285-1306, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Benson Teck Heng Lim & Bee Lan Oo & Charlie McLeod & Pengqi Yang, 2024. "Institutional and Actor Network Perspectives of Waste Management in Australia: Is the Construction Industry Prepared for a Circular Economy?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Rui Coelho & Shital Jayantilal & Joao J. Ferreira, 2023. "The impact of social responsibility on corporate financial performance: A systematic literature review," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 1535-1560, July.
    3. Cheng, Cheng & Lu, Jia-Wei & Zhu, Rui & Xiao, Zuopeng & Costa, Alysson M. & Thompson, Russell G., 2022. "An integrated multi-objective model for disaster waste clean-up systems optimization," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    4. Arturo Luque González & Jesús Ángel Coronado Martín & Ana Cecilia Vaca-Tapia & Francklin Rivas, 2021. "How Sustainability Is Defined: An Analysis of 100 Theoretical Approximations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-20, June.
    5. Ilaria Baghi & Paolo Antonetti, 2021. "The higher they climb, the harder they fall: The role of self‐brand connectedness in consumer responses to corporate social responsibility hypocrisy," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(4), pages 1216-1230, July.
    6. Popkova, Elena & DeLo, Piper & Sergi, Bruno S., 2021. "Corporate Social Responsibility Amid Social Distancing During the COVID-19 Crisis: BRICS vs. OECD Countries," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    7. Alessandro Da Giau & Nicolai J. Foss & Andrea Furlan & Andrea Vinelli, 2020. "Sustainable development and dynamic capabilities in the fashion industry: A multi‐case study," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3), pages 1509-1520, May.
    8. Lucas Inacio Santos & Rosley Anholon & Dirceu Silva & Carlos Raul Etulain & Vasco Sanchez Rodrigues & Walter Leal Filho, 2022. "Corporate social responsibility projects: critical success factors for better performance of Brazilian companies and guidelines to qualify professionals and entrepreneurs," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 1685-1706, December.
    9. Tianli Feng & Fan Yang & Biao Tan & Jihong Wu, 2022. "Corporate Social Irresponsibility Punishments from Stakeholders—Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-14, April.
    10. Brown, Charlotte & Milke, Mark, 2016. "Recycling disaster waste: Feasibility, method and effectiveness," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 21-32.
    11. María Iborra & Marta Riera, 2023. "Corporate social irresponsibility: What we know and what we need to know," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 1421-1439, May.
    12. Naila Fares & Jaime Lloret & Vikas Kumar & Sander de Leeuw & Liz Barnes, 2024. "Optimisation of multi‐tier supply chain distribution networks with corporate social responsibility concerns in fast‐fashion retail," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 311-330, January.
    13. Simone Terzani & Teresa Turzo, 2021. "Religious social norms and corporate sustainability: The effect of religiosity on environmental, social, and governance disclosure," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1), pages 485-496, January.
    14. Lenka Veselovská & Ján Závadský & Zuzana Závadská, 2020. "Mitigating bribery risks to strengthen the corporate social responsibility in accordance with the ISO 37001," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1972-1988, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:7:p:3494-:d:525444. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.