IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/recore/v54y2010i3p194-204.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deconstructing disaster: Economic and environmental impacts of deconstruction in post-Katrina New Orleans

Author

Listed:
  • Denhart, Hazel

Abstract

Within weeks of the 2005 hurricanes, Katrina and Rita, along the Gulf region of the United States, Mercy Corps implemented a deconstruction program to reclaim building material from some of the 275,000 destroyed homes. In contrast to machine demolition where massive flows of construction debris are directed into landfills, hand deconstruction of buildings diverts materials out of landfills by redirecting them back into reuse or recycling. This study reports findings of reclaimed material from four deconstructed houses. Over 20,000 data points revealed salvage rates of 38–75% of the buildings by weight. A total of 44 tons of material was redirected back into the local building material stream (enough to build three new homes out of the four that came down). This included 32,342 board feet of reusable lumber among the $60,000 worth of products returned to a devastated local economy. In this study the cost/profit of deconstruction varied from a net cost of $3.80 to a net profit of $1.53 per square foot. This compares to an estimated net cost of demolition at a steady $5.50 per square foot. Also, deconstruction in post-disaster New Orleans revealed better efficiency of labor than in previous non-disaster situated studies. This report includes a review of scholarly and non-scholarly literature in the deconstruction field to provide a snapshot of the emerging industry. This report is one of two sponsored by Mercy Corps on the use of deconstruction in post-disaster New Orleans. The companion study (Denhart, 2009) conducted as a phenomenology examined the psycho-social impact of deconstruction in disaster response. These two studies support the use of deconstruction among countries seeking to achieve the UN Millennium Development Goals of reducing the human and environmental impact of disasters by 2015.

Suggested Citation

  • Denhart, Hazel, 2010. "Deconstructing disaster: Economic and environmental impacts of deconstruction in post-Katrina New Orleans," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 194-204.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:54:y:2010:i:3:p:194-204
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.07.016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344909001712
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.07.016?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dantata, Nasiru & Touran, Ali & Wang, James, 2005. "An analysis of cost and duration for deconstruction and demolition of residential buildings in Massachusetts," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 1-15.
    2. Bradley Guy, 2006. "The optimisation of building deconstruction for Department of Defense facilities: Ft. McClellan Deconstruction Project," International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(3/4), pages 386-404.
    3. Manar Shami, 2008. "Solid waste sustainability related to building deconstruction," International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(2/3), pages 117-191.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brown, Charlotte & Milke, Mark, 2016. "Recycling disaster waste: Feasibility, method and effectiveness," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 21-32.
    2. Paulina Guerrero-Miranda & Arturo Luque González, 2021. "Social Responsibility, Sustainability, and Public Policy: The Lessons of Debris Management after the Manabí Earthquake in Ecuador," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-15, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qianqian Zhao & Junzhen Li & Roman Fediuk & Sergey Klyuev & Darya Nemova, 2021. "Benefit Evaluation Model of Prefabricated Buildings in Seasonally Frozen Regions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Pongiglione, M. & Calderini, C., 2014. "Material savings through structural steel reuse: A case study in Genoa," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 87-92.
    3. Charef, Rabia & Ganjian, Eshmaiel & Emmitt, Stephen, 2021. "Socio-economic and environmental barriers for a holistic asset lifecycle approach to achieve circular economy: A pattern-matching method," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    4. Cooper, Simone & Skelton, Alexandra C.H. & Owen, Anne & Densley-Tingley, Danielle & Allwood, Julian M., 2016. "A multi-method approach for analysing the potential employment impacts of material efficiency," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 54-66.
    5. Jiménez-Rivero, Ana & García-Navarro, Justo, 2017. "Exploring factors influencing post-consumer gypsum recycling and landfilling in the European Union," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 116-123.
    6. Coelho, André & de Brito, Jorge, 2011. "Economic analysis of conventional versus selective demolition—A case study," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 55(3), pages 382-392.
    7. Ajayi, Saheed O. & Oyedele, Lukumon O. & Bilal, Muhammad & Akinade, Olugbenga O. & Alaka, Hafiz A. & Owolabi, Hakeem A. & Kadiri, Kabir O., 2015. "Waste effectiveness of the construction industry: Understanding the impediments and requisites for improvements," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 101-112.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:54:y:2010:i:3:p:194-204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kai Meng (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/resources-conservation-and-recycling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.