IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/corsem/v27y2020i4p1972-1988.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mitigating bribery risks to strengthen the corporate social responsibility in accordance with the ISO 37001

Author

Listed:
  • Lenka Veselovská
  • Ján Závadský
  • Zuzana Závadská

Abstract

The main aim of this research is to develop an innovative Bribery Risk Index (BRI) to measure organization's level of bribery risk in accordance with the ISO 37001 to strengthen the corporate social responsibility and to verify it under the conditions of selected enterprises. The value of this paper is mainly in providing a possible tool to handle the problem of bribery that has not been successfully solved. The ISO 37001 provides general areas where bribery risks could originate in organization, but it does not provide a specific list of risk factors. It is up to companies to create such risk factors, and this paper provides a possible solution to this challenge by creating a complex list of bribery risk factors and incorporating them into one indicator—the BRI. As such, the proposed BRI is an original approach to assessing an organization's level of bribery risk. The results were achieved through four case studies. The first step was risk management application for bribery risk analysis according to ISO 37001. Findings were used to create a list of criteria with specific importance and consequently the creation of a BRI. The proposed index can also serve to compare organizations' levels of bribery risk regardless of their size and serve in bribery prevention because it identifies the areas in the enterprise where the risk of bribery can be significant and can affect the ability of the organization to perform its functions for its stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Lenka Veselovská & Ján Závadský & Zuzana Závadská, 2020. "Mitigating bribery risks to strengthen the corporate social responsibility in accordance with the ISO 37001," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1972-1988, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:27:y:2020:i:4:p:1972-1988
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.1909
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1909
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/csr.1909?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Víctor Amor‐Esteban & Ma‐Purificación Galindo‐Villardón & Isabel‐María García‐Sánchez & Fátima David, 2019. "An extension of the industrial corporate social responsibility practices index: New information for stakeholder engagement under a multivariate approach," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1), pages 127-140, January.
    2. Luciana De Andrade Costa & Emerson Wagner Mainardes, 2016. "The role of corruption and risk aversion in entrepreneurial intentions," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(4), pages 290-293, March.
    3. Søreide, Tina, 2009. "Too risk averse to stay honest?: Business corruption, uncertainty and attitudes toward risk," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 388-395, December.
    4. Eva López‐González & Jennifer Martínez‐Ferrero & Emma García‐Meca, 2019. "Does corporate social responsibility affect tax avoidance: Evidence from family firms," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(4), pages 819-831, July.
    5. Arturo Luque & Noelia Herrero‐García, 2019. "How corporate social (ir)responsibility in the textile sector is defined, and its impact on ethical sustainability: An analysis of 133 concepts," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(6), pages 1285-1306, November.
    6. Chen, Yunsen & Xie, Yuan & You, Hong & Zhang, Yanan, 2018. "Does crackdown on corruption reduce stock price crash risk? Evidence from China," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 125-141.
    7. Báger, Gusztáv, 2011. "Corruption Risks in Public Administration – Methodology and Empirical Experiences," Public Finance Quarterly, Corvinus University of Budapest, vol. 56(1), pages 44-57.
    8. Paul Heywood & Jan‐Hinrik Meyer‐Sahling, 2013. "Danger Zones Of Corruption: How Management Of The Ministerial Bureaucracy Affects Corruption Risks In Poland," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 33(3), pages 191-204, August.
    9. Muhammad Azizul Islam & Thusitha Dissanayake & Steven Dellaportas & Shamima Haque, 2018. "Anti-bribery disclosures: A response to networked governance," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(1), pages 3-16, March.
    10. Oliver Cover & Saad Mustafa, 2014. "Identifying Corruption Risks In The Defense And Security Sector: Empirical Evidence Using The Government Defense Anti-Corruption Index," Economics of Peace and Security Journal, EPS Publishing, vol. 9(2), pages 27-33, October.
    11. Pulay, Gyula & Lucza, Anikó, 2018. "Objective corruption risks – subjective controls – Integrity of Publicly Owned Business Associations, Methodology and Results of the Integrity Survey," Public Finance Quarterly, Corvinus University of Budapest, vol. 63(4), pages 490-510.
    12. Archie B. Carroll, 2016. "Carroll’s pyramid of CSR: taking another look," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 1-8, December.
    13. Igor Álvarez Etxeberria & Maider Aldaz Odriozola, 2018. "The social reputation of European companies: Does anti‐corruption disclosure affect stakeholders' perceptions?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5), pages 713-721, September.
    14. Qian, Ningyu, 2018. "Anti-corruption effects on the credit risk of local financing vehicles and the pricing of Chengtou bonds: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 162-168.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maider Aldaz Odriozola & Igor Álvarez Etxeberria, 2021. "Determinants of Corporate Anti-Corruption Disclosure: The Case of the Emerging Economics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Shenghui Tong, 2022. "Corruption and anti‐corruption in China: a review and future research agenda," Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, The Crawford School, The Australian National University, vol. 36(1), pages 3-16, May.
    3. Krishnamurti, Chandrasekhar & Pensiero, Domenico & Velayutham, Eswaran, 2021. "Corruption risk and stock market effects: Evidence from the defence industry," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    4. Haoyu Gao & Fukang Chen & Yiling Ouyang, 2024. "The impacts of political uncertainty on public financing costs: evidence from anti-corruption investigations in China," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 198(1), pages 69-91, January.
    5. Pier Luigi Marchini & Tatiana Mazza & Alice Medioli, 2020. "Corruption and sustainable development: The impact on income shifting in European international groups," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 717-730, March.
    6. Linda Jansen & Peggy Cunningham & Sandra Diehl & Ralf Terlutter, 2024. "Corporate social responsibility in controversial industries: A literature review and research agenda," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 4398-4427, September.
    7. Boubaker, Sabri & Liu, Pei-Zhi & Ren, Yi-Shuai & Ma, Chao-Qun, 2024. "Do anti-corruption campaigns affect corporate environmental responsibility? Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    8. Sorin Gabriel Anton & Ionel Bostan, 2017. "The Role of Access to Finance in Explaining Cross-National Variation in Entrepreneurial Activity: A Panel Data Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-16, October.
    9. Cai, Weixing & Hu, Feng & Xu, Fangming & Zheng, Liyi, 2022. "Anti-corruption campaign and corporate cash holdings: Evidence from China," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(PA).
    10. Lin Chuan & Stavros Sindakis & Panagiotis Theodorou, 2024. "Examining the Impact of Political Stability on Stock Price Crash Risk: Evidence from China," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 8179-8208, June.
    11. Ahmed, Walid M.A., 2020. "Corruption and equity market performance: International comparative evidence," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    12. Emanuel Wittberg & Gissur Ó. Erlingsson & Karl Wennberg, 2024. "Does local government corruption inhibit entrepreneurship?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 62(2), pages 775-806, February.
    13. Li, Guangzi & Chan, Kam C., 2021. "Anti-corruption intensity and loan contracting: Evidence from non-state owned firms in China," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    14. Dewan Muktadir‐Al‐Mukit & Firoz Haroon Bhaiyat, 2024. "Impact of corporate governance diversity on carbon emission under environmental policy via the mandatory nonfinancial reporting regulation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 1397-1417, February.
    15. Camilla Salvatore & Silvia Biffignandi & Annamaria Bianchi, 2022. "Corporate Social Responsibility Activities Through Twitter: From Topic Model Analysis to Indexes Measuring Communication Characteristics," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 164(3), pages 1217-1248, December.
    16. Oleksandra Rozhenko & Maryna Iurchenko & Vytautas Juscius, 2023. "Assessing the provision of innovative technologies for the growth of corporate social responsibility in Lithuania," Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, PC TECHNOLOGY CENTER, vol. 5(13 (125)), pages 26-35, October.
    17. Esra Alniacik & Charefeddine Moumen & Umit Alniacik, 2020. "The moderating role of personal value orientation on the links between perceived corporate social performance and purchase intentions," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 2724-2734, November.
    18. Tian, Jinfang & Sun, Siyang & Cao, Wei & Bu, Di & Xue, Rui, 2024. "Make every dollar count: The impact of green credit regulation on corporate green investment efficiency," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    19. Gaoussou Diarra & Sébastien Marchand, 2011. "Does Pervasive Corruption Matter For Firm's Demand for Good Governance in Developing Countries?," CERDI Working papers halshs-00588191, HAL.
    20. Rui Coelho & Shital Jayantilal & Joao J. Ferreira, 2023. "The impact of social responsibility on corporate financial performance: A systematic literature review," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 1535-1560, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:27:y:2020:i:4:p:1972-1988. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.