IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i24p13115-d700714.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exoskeletons and Exosuits Could Benefit from Mode-Switching Body Interfaces That Loosen/Tighten to Improve Thermal Comfort

Author

Listed:
  • Laura J. Elstub

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37212, USA)

  • Shimra J. Fine

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37212, USA)

  • Karl E. Zelik

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37212, USA
    Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37212, USA
    Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37212, USA)

Abstract

Exoskeletons and exosuits (exos) are wearable devices that physically assist movement. User comfort is critically important for societal adoption of exos. Thermal comfort (a person’s satisfaction with their thermal environment) represents a key design challenge. Exos must physically attach/interface to the body to apply forces, and these interfaces inevitably trap some heat. It is envisioned that thermal comfort could be improved by designing mode-switching exo interfaces that temporarily loosen around a body segment when assistive forces are not being applied. To inform exo design, a case series study ( N = 4) based on single-subject design principles was performed. Our objective was to assess individual responses to skin temperature and thermal comfort during physical activity with a Loose leg-sleeve interface compared with a Form-Fitting one, and immediately after a Form-Fitting sleeve switched to Loose. Skin under the Loose sleeve was 2–3 °C (4–6 °F) cooler after 25 min of physical activity, and two of four participants reported the Loose sleeve improved their thermal comfort. After completion of the physical activity, the Form-Fitting sleeve was loosened, causing a 2–4 °C (3–8 °F) drop in skin temperature underneath for all participants, and two participants to report slightly improved thermal comfort. These findings confirmed that an exo that can quickly loosen its interface when assistance is not required—and re-tighten when it is— has the potential to enhance thermal comfort for some individuals and environments. More broadly, this study demonstrates that mode-switching mechanisms in exos can do more than adjust physical assistance: they can also exploit thermodynamics and facilitate thermoregulation in a way that enhances comfort for exo users.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura J. Elstub & Shimra J. Fine & Karl E. Zelik, 2021. "Exoskeletons and Exosuits Could Benefit from Mode-Switching Body Interfaces That Loosen/Tighten to Improve Thermal Comfort," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-12, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:24:p:13115-:d:700714
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/24/13115/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/24/13115/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simona Del Ferraro & Tiziana Falcone & Alberto Ranavolo & Vincenzo Molinaro, 2020. "The Effects of Upper-Body Exoskeletons on Human Metabolic Cost and Thermal Response during Work Tasks—A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-25, October.
    2. Mathilde Schwartz & Jean Theurel & Kévin Desbrosses, 2021. "Effectiveness of Soft versus Rigid Back-Support Exoskeletons during a Lifting Task," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-12, July.
    3. Rietta S. Wagoner & Nicolas I. López-Gálvez & Jill G. de Zapien & Stephanie C. Griffin & Robert A. Canales & Paloma I. Beamer, 2020. "An Occupational Heat Stress and Hydration Assessment of Agricultural Workers in North Mexico," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-13, March.
    4. Steven H. Collins & M. Bruce Wiggin & Gregory S. Sawicki, 2015. "Reducing the energy cost of human walking using an unpowered exoskeleton," Nature, Nature, vol. 522(7555), pages 212-215, June.
    5. Djongyang, Noël & Tchinda, René & Njomo, Donatien, 2010. "Thermal comfort: A review paper," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 2626-2640, December.
    6. Yang Liu & Xiaoling Li & Jiarui Lai & Aibin Zhu & Xiaodong Zhang & Ziming Zheng & Huijin Zhu & Yueyang Shi & Long Wang & Zhangyi Chen, 2021. "The Effects of a Passive Exoskeleton on Human Thermal Responses in Temperate and Cold Environments," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-17, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ci-Jyun Liang & Marvin H. Cheng, 2023. "Trends in Robotics Research in Occupational Safety and Health: A Scientometric Analysis and Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(10), pages 1-21, May.
    2. Ribeiro, Thatiana Jessica da Silva & Mady, Carlos Eduardo Keutenedjian, 2022. "Comparison among exergy analysis methods applied to a human body thermal model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    3. Bruno Malet-Damour & Jean-Pierre Habas & Dimitri Bigot, 2023. "Is Loose-Fill Plastic Waste an Opportunity for Thermal Insulation in Cold and Humid Tropical Climates?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, June.
    4. Djamila, Harimi, 2017. "Indoor thermal comfort predictions: Selected issues and trends," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 569-580.
    5. Francesco Asdrubali & Cinzia Buratti & Franco Cotana & Giorgio Baldinelli & Michele Goretti & Elisa Moretti & Catia Baldassarri & Elisa Belloni & Francesco Bianchi & Antonella Rotili & Marco Vergoni &, 2013. "Evaluation of Green Buildings’ Overall Performance through in Situ Monitoring and Simulations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-23, December.
    6. Amir Faraji & Maria Rashidi & Fatemeh Rezaei & Payam Rahnamayiezekavat, 2023. "A Meta-Synthesis Review of Occupant Comfort Assessment in Buildings (2002–2022)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-36, February.
    7. Liu, Mingyi & Qian, Feng & Mi, Jia & Zuo, Lei, 2022. "Biomechanical energy harvesting for wearable and mobile devices: State-of-the-art and future directions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    8. Mkaddem, Chamseddine & Mahjoubi, Soufiane, 2022. "Climate change and its impact on water consumption in Tunisia: Evidence from ARDL approach," MPRA Paper 115658, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Dec 2022.
    9. Feng, Yanxiao & Liu, Shichao & Wang, Julian & Yang, Jing & Jao, Ying-Ling & Wang, Nan, 2022. "Data-driven personal thermal comfort prediction: A literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    10. Michael Short & Sergio Rodriguez & Richard Charlesworth & Tracey Crosbie & Nashwan Dawood, 2019. "Optimal Dispatch of Aggregated HVAC Units for Demand Response: An Industry 4.0 Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-20, November.
    11. Rahimi, Elnaz & Babapoor, Aziz & Moradi, Gholamreza & Kalantari, Saba & Monazzam Esmaeelpour, Mohammadreza, 2024. "Personal cooling garments and phase change materials: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 190(PB).
    12. Van Craenendonck, Stijn & Lauriks, Leen & Vuye, Cedric & Kampen, Jarl, 2018. "A review of human thermal comfort experiments in controlled and semi-controlled environments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 3365-3378.
    13. Enescu, Diana, 2017. "A review of thermal comfort models and indicators for indoor environments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1353-1379.
    14. Escandón, Rocío & Suárez, Rafael & Sendra, Juan José, 2019. "Field assessment of thermal comfort conditions and energy performance of social housing: The case of hot summers in the Mediterranean climate," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 377-392.
    15. Azar, Elie & Nikolopoulou, Christina & Papadopoulos, Sokratis, 2016. "Integrating and optimizing metrics of sustainable building performance using human-focused agent-based modeling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 926-937.
    16. Haider Latif & Samira Rahnama & Alessandro Maccarini & Goran Hultmark & Peter V. Nielsen & Alireza Afshari, 2022. "Precision Ventilation in an Open-Plan Office: A New Application of Active Chilled Beam (ACB) with a JetCone Feature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-17, April.
    17. Omar al-Ani & Sanjoy Das & Hongyu Wu, 2023. "Imitation Learning with Deep Attentive Tabular Neural Networks for Environmental Prediction and Control in Smart Home," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-19, June.
    18. Pilechiha, Peiman & Mahdavinejad, Mohammadjavad & Pour Rahimian, Farzad & Carnemolla, Phillippa & Seyedzadeh, Saleh, 2020. "Multi-objective optimisation framework for designing office windows: quality of view, daylight and energy efficiency," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    19. Yuan, Jihui & Huang, Pei & Chai, Jiale, 2022. "Development of a calibrated typical meteorological year weather file in system design of zero-energy building for performance improvements," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    20. Verbeke, Stijn & Audenaert, Amaryllis, 2018. "Thermal inertia in buildings: A review of impacts across climate and building use," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2300-2318.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:24:p:13115-:d:700714. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.