IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i22p11905-d678134.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training and Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Overweight and Obesity Children and Adolescents: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Author

Listed:
  • Meng Cao

    (Department of Physical Education, Normal College, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518061, China
    Department of Physical Education, Institute of KEEP Collaborative Innovation, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518061, China)

  • Yucheng Tang

    (Department of Physical Education, Normal College, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518061, China
    Department of Physical Education, Institute of KEEP Collaborative Innovation, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518061, China)

  • Shu Li

    (Department of Physical Education, Normal College, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518061, China)

  • Yu Zou

    (Department of Sport and Exercise Science, College of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

Abstract

Background : The purpose of this review was to compare the effectiveness of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on cardiometabolic risk factors of obese children and adolescents. Methods : Relevant studies published in PubMed, MEDLINE and Web of Science databases were searched. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examined the effect of HIIT and MICT on children and adolescents with obesity were included. Meta-analyses were conducted to determine the effect of HIIT on cardiometabolic risk factors using STATA software and potential moderators were explored (i.e., study duration, training modalities, work/rest ratio and work duration time). Results : Twelve RCTs involving 325 participants were included in the meta-analysis. HIIT showed more positive effects on maximal oxygen uptake (VO 2max ; SMD = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.39 to 1.35, p = 0.000) and systolic blood pressure (SBP; SMD = −0.64, 95% CI: −1.05 to −0.22, p = 0.003) than MICT. However, when compared with MICT, HIIT caused no significant differences in body weight, body mass index, body fat percentage, diastolic blood pressure and glycolipid metabolism markers. Furthermore, subgroup analysis showed that the effects of HIIT on VO 2max and SBP were significantly different regarding protocol factors, such as modality, duration, training time, training settings, work/rest ratio and work duration. Conclusions : HIIT has a positive role in promoting cardiometabolic risk factors in obese children and adolescents. Moreover, when compared with MICT, HIIT had a more significant effect on improving cardiorespiratory fitness and systolic blood pressure. The factors of HIIT protocol had an important influence on the intervention effects of childhood obesity.

Suggested Citation

  • Meng Cao & Yucheng Tang & Shu Li & Yu Zou, 2021. "Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training and Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Overweight and Obesity Children and Adolescents: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-22, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:22:p:11905-:d:678134
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/22/11905/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/22/11905/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rhona Martin-Smith & Ashley Cox & Duncan S. Buchan & Julien S. Baker & Fergal Grace & Nicholas Sculthorpe, 2020. "High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) Improves Cardiorespiratory Fitness (CRF) in Healthy, Overweight and Obese Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-20, April.
    2. Meng Cao & Minghui Quan & Jie Zhuang, 2019. "Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training versus Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Children and Adolescents: A Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-13, April.
    3. Sue Duval & Richard Tweedie, 2000. "Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel-Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 56(2), pages 455-463, June.
    4. Reichert, F.F. & Barros, A.J.D. & Domingues, M.R. & Hallal, P.C., 2007. "The role of perceived personal barriers to engagement in leisure-time physical activity," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 97(3), pages 515-519.
    5. Alessandro Liberati & Douglas G Altman & Jennifer Tetzlaff & Cynthia Mulrow & Peter C Gøtzsche & John P A Ioannidis & Mike Clarke & P J Devereaux & Jos Kleijnen & David Moher, 2009. "The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-28, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Damiano Pizzol & Mike Trott & Igor Grabovac & Mario Antunes & Anna Claudia Colangelo & Simona Ippoliti & Cristian Petre Ilie & Anne Carrie & Nicola Veronese & Lee Smith, 2021. "Laparoscopy in Low-Income Countries: 10-Year Experience and Systematic Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-11, May.
    2. Meng Cao & Minghui Quan & Jie Zhuang, 2019. "Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training versus Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Children and Adolescents: A Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-13, April.
    3. Tang, Xinfeng & Tang, Suqin & Ren, Zhihong & Wong, Daniel Fu Keung, 2020. "Psychological risk and protective factors associated with depressive symptoms among adolescents in secondary schools in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    4. Ricardo M. Hodann-Caudevilla & Cintia Díaz-Silveira & Francisco A. Burgos-Julián & Miguel A. Santed, 2020. "Mindfulness-Based Interventions for People with Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-18, June.
    5. Daniele Nucci & Cristina Fatigoni & Andrea Amerio & Anna Odone & Vincenza Gianfredi, 2020. "Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk of Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-20, September.
    6. Tomohide Yamada & Kazuo Hara & Hitomi Umematsu & Ryo Suzuki & Takashi Kadowaki, 2012. "Erectile Dysfunction and Cardiovascular Events in Diabetic Men: A Meta-analysis of Observational Studies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-7, September.
    7. Rafael del-Pino-Casado & Marta Rodríguez Cardosa & Catalina López-Martínez & Vasiliki Orgeta, 2019. "The association between subjective caregiver burden and depressive symptoms in carers of older relatives: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-16, May.
    8. Ramya Ramamoorthi & Daniel Gahreman & Timothy Skinner & Simon Moss, 2019. "The effect of yoga practice on glycemic control and other health parameters in the prediabetic state: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, October.
    9. Carmela A White & Bob Uttl & Mark D Holder, 2019. "Meta-analyses of positive psychology interventions: The effects are much smaller than previously reported," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-48, May.
    10. Amy J Morgan & Anna Ross & Nicola J Reavley, 2018. "Systematic review and meta-analysis of Mental Health First Aid training: Effects on knowledge, stigma, and helping behaviour," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-20, May.
    11. Jong Seung Kim & Sam Hyun Kwon, 2016. "Mupirocin in the Treatment of Staphylococcal Infections in Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-11, December.
    12. Meng-Ni Wu & Ping-Tao Tseng & Tien-Yu Chen & Yen-Wen Chen & Li-Min Liou & Pao-Yen Lin & Chung-Yao Hsu, 2018. "The efficacy and tolerability of rotigotine on patients with periodic limb movement in sleep: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, April.
    13. William Kofi Bosu & Siobhan Theresa Reilly & Justice Moses Kwaku Aheto & Eugenio Zucchelli, 2019. "Hypertension in older adults in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-25, April.
    14. Agustín Manresa-Rocamora & José Manuel Sarabia & Alejandro Javaloyes & Andrew A. Flatt & Manuel Moya-Ramón, 2021. "Heart Rate Variability-Guided Training for Enhancing Cardiac-Vagal Modulation, Aerobic Fitness, and Endurance Performance: A Methodological Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-22, September.
    15. Rafael del-Pino-Casado & Antonio Frías-Osuna & Pedro A Palomino-Moral & María Ruzafa-Martínez & Antonio J Ramos-Morcillo, 2018. "Social support and subjective burden in caregivers of adults and older adults: A meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, January.
    16. Moses N. Ikiugu & Whitney Lucas-Molitor & Diana Feldhacker & Cassidy Gebhart & Mallory Spier & Lauren Kapels & Riley Arnold & Rebecca Gaikowski, 2019. "Guidelines for Occupational Therapy Interventions Based on Meaningful and Psychologically Rewarding Occupations," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 20(7), pages 2027-2053, October.
    17. Xiaoli Liu & Guichuan Huang & Jing Zhang & Longju Zhang & Zongan Liang, 2020. "Prognostic and clinicopathological significance of long noncoding RNA MALAT-1 expression in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-16, October.
    18. Xiaowen Li & Xing Rong & Zhi Wang & Aihua Lin, 2020. "Association between Smoking and Noise-Induced Hearing Loss: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-14, February.
    19. Joan Puig-Barberà & Sonia Tamames-Gómez & Pedro Plans-Rubio & José María Eiros-Bouza, 2022. "Relative Effectiveness of Cell-Cultured versus Egg-Based Seasonal Influenza Vaccines in Preventing Influenza-Related Outcomes in Subjects 18 Years Old or Older: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-20, January.
    20. Xiaofeng Zhou & Guan Zhang & Ye Tian, 2015. "p53 Status Correlates with the Risk of Recurrence in Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancers Treated with Bacillus Calmette–Guérin: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-12, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:22:p:11905-:d:678134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.