IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i14p7341-d591251.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Barriers to, and Facilitators of, Exercising in Fitness Centres among Adults with and without Physical Disabilities: A Scoping Review

Author

Listed:
  • Helene Nikolajsen

    (Research Unit for Musculoskeletal Function and Physiotherapy, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark
    Department of Physiotherapy, Institute of Health Studies, University College South Denmark, 6705 Esbjerg Ø, Denmark)

  • Louise Fleng Sandal

    (Research Unit for Physical Activity and Health in Work Life, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark)

  • Carsten Bogh Juhl

    (Research Unit for Musculoskeletal Function and Physiotherapy, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark
    Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark)

  • Jens Troelsen

    (Research Unit for Active Living, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark)

  • Birgit Juul-Kristensen

    (Research Unit for Musculoskeletal Function and Physiotherapy, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark)

Abstract

Fitness centres are an obvious arena for performing physical activity for the general population but representation of adults with physical disabilities (AwPD) is lacking. To increase possibilities for AwPD to exercise in fitness centres together with adults without physical disabilities (AwoPD), the aim of this study was to identify, synthesise, and compare barriers to, and facilitators of, exercising in fitness centres for each group. A scoping review was conducted and data extraction of the barriers and facilitators was performed independently by two researchers on six categories of contextual factors based on the framework of Di Blasi: (1) The fitness centre setting; (2) The fitness centre user characteristics; (3) The fitness instructor/staff characteristics; (4) The fitness centre user–instructor/management relationship; and (5) The fitness/exercise characteristics. An extra category, (6) Other relationships, was added. The PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews was used for reporting. Of the 102 included papers, only 26 (25%) of the papers were on AwPD, which focused mainly on physical barriers (category 1: inaccessible settings). In contrast, the remaining 76 papers involving AwoPD focused primarily on facilitators (category 2: motivational factors and exercising effects). In categories 3–6, the two groups had similar results, as both groups preferred skilled instructors, a welcoming and comfortable fitness centre environment, an ability to exercise at their preferred type and level, and good social connections. Since most data were based on AwoPD, more studies on actual experiences from AwPD are needed, to reveal the facilitators/motivational factors for fitness centre use.

Suggested Citation

  • Helene Nikolajsen & Louise Fleng Sandal & Carsten Bogh Juhl & Jens Troelsen & Birgit Juul-Kristensen, 2021. "Barriers to, and Facilitators of, Exercising in Fitness Centres among Adults with and without Physical Disabilities: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-32, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:14:p:7341-:d:591251
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/14/7341/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/14/7341/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jairo León-Quismondo & Jorge García-Unanue & Pablo Burillo, 2020. "Service Perceptions in Fitness Centers: IPA Approach by Gender and Age," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-10, April.
    2. van der Swaluw, Koen & Lambooij, M. & Mathijssen, Jolanda & Schipper, M. & Zeelenberg, Marcel & Berkhout, S. & Polder, Johan & Prast, Henriette, 2018. "Physical Activity after Commitment Lotteries : Examining Long-Term Results in a Cluster Randomized Trial," Other publications TiSEM eab06f73-166d-442e-9dda-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    3. Krahn, G.L. & Walker, D.K. & Correa-De-Araujo, R., 2015. "Persons with disabilities as an unrecognized health disparity population," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 105, pages 198-206.
    4. van der Swaluw, Koen & Lambooij, M. & Mathijssen, Jolanda & Schipper, M. & Zeelenberg, Marcel & Berkhout, S. & Polder, Johan & Prast, Henriette, 2018. "Physical Activity after Commitment Lotteries : Examining Long-Term Results in a Cluster Randomized Trial," Discussion Paper 2018-006, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alessio Bellini & Andrea Nicolò & Jacopo Emanuele Rocchi & Ilenia Bazzucchi & Massimo Sacchetti, 2022. "Walking Attenuates Postprandial Glycemic Response: What Else Can We Do without Leaving Home or the Office?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Mohamed A. Zayed & Mohamed A. Moustafa & Musaddag Elrayah & Ibrahim A. Elshaer, 2024. "Optimizing Quality of Life of Vulnerable Students: The Impact of Physical Fitness, Self-Esteem, and Academic Performance: A Case Study of Saudi Arabia Universities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-21, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Camilleri, Adrian R. & Dankova, Katarina & Ortiz, Jose M. & Neelim, Ananta, 2023. "Increasing worker motivation using a reward scheme with probabilistic elements," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    2. Reisgies, Helena & Shukri, Arim & Scheckel, Benjamin & Karasch, Olaf & Wiesen, Daniel & Stock, Stephanie & Müller, Dirk, 2023. "Effectiveness of behavioural economics-informed interventions to promote physical activity: A systematic review and meta-analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 338(C).
    3. Nizar Souiden, 2024. "Recreational marijuana: Ethical positions and consumption status in explaining attitudes, perceived law ethicalness, and perceived corporate social responsibility," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 4512-4531, September.
    4. Jairo León-Quismondo & José Bonal & Pablo Burillo & Álvaro Fernández-Luna, 2023. "How Can We Improve Running Events? The IPA4RE Questionnaire and Its Potential Impact on the Experience of Runners," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-12, January.
    5. Pearse McCusker & Lauren Gillespie & Gavin Davidson & Sarah Vicary & Kevin Stone, 2023. "The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and Social Work: Evidence for Impact?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(20), pages 1-18, October.
    6. Jairo León-Quismondo & José Bonal & Pablo Burillo & Álvaro Fernández-Luna, 2020. "Walkability and Fitness Center Prices, Opening Hours, and Extra Services: The Case of Madrid, Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-10, August.
    7. Rosemary B. Hughes & Susan Robinson-Whelen & Carly Knudson, 2022. "Cancer Disparities Experienced by People with Disabilities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-9, July.
    8. James H. Rimmer, 2022. "Addressing Disability Inequities: Let’s Stop Admiring the Problem and Do Something about It," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-8, September.
    9. Amilon, Anna & Hansen, Kasper M. & Kjær, Agnete Aslaug & Steffensen, Tinne, 2021. "Estimating disability prevalence and disability-related inequalities: Does the choice of measure matter?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    10. Robin G. Lanzi & Riddhi A. Modi & James Rimmer, 2023. "A Disability-Inclusive Healthcare-to-Well-Being Translational Science Framework," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(1), pages 1-13, December.
    11. Dixon-Ibarra, Alicia & Nery-Hurwit, Mara & Driver, Simon & MacDonald, Megan, 2017. "Using health promotion guidelines for persons with disabilities to develop and evaluate a physical activity program for individuals with multiple sclerosis: A feasibility study," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 150-159.
    12. Naomi Hlongwane & Lieketseng Ned & Emma McKinney & Vic McKinney & Leslie Swartz, 2022. "Experiences of Organisations of (or That Serve) Persons with Disabilities during the COVID-19 Pandemic and National Lockdown Period in South Africa," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-16, October.
    13. Abigail Mulcahy & Carl G. Streed & Anna Marie Wallisch & Katie Batza & Noelle Kurth & Jean P. Hall & Darcy Jones McMaughan, 2022. "Gender Identity, Disability, and Unmet Healthcare Needs among Disabled People Living in the Community in the United States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-19, February.
    14. Ann I. Alriksson-Schmidt & Gunnar Hägglund, 2021. "Public Health and Disability: A Real-Life Example of the Importance of Keeping Up the Good Work," Disabilities, MDPI, vol. 1(3), pages 1-10, July.
    15. Adyya Gupta & Anne Kavanagh & George Disney, 2021. "The Impact of and Government Planning and Responses to Pandemics for People with Disability: A Rapid Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-9, June.
    16. Raeda K. Anderson & Daniel S. Pasciuti & Chloe M. Sellers, 2024. "Livability vs. Affordability; Disability and Housing in the United States," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-12, May.
    17. Susan Magasi & Hilary K. Marshall & Cassandra Winters & David Victorson, 2022. "Cancer Survivors’ Disability Experiences and Identities: A Qualitative Exploration to Advance Cancer Equity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-17, March.
    18. Kerri A. Vanderbom & Yochai Eisenberg & Allison H. Tubbs & Teneasha Washington & Alex X. Martínez & Amy Rauworth, 2018. "Changing the Paradigm in Public Health and Disability through a Knowledge Translation Center," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-10, February.
    19. Jayajit Chakraborty, 2021. "Vulnerability to the COVID-19 Pandemic for People with Disabilities in the U.S," Disabilities, MDPI, vol. 1(3), pages 1-8, September.
    20. Twardzik, Erica & Colabianchi, Natalie & Duncan, Lilia & Lisabeth, Lynda D. & Brown, Susan H. & Clarke, Philippa J., 2022. "“Well in in this neighborhood I have walked, not at all”: Stroke survivors lived experience in the outdoor environment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:14:p:7341-:d:591251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.