IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i10p5278-d555509.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perception and Acceptance of People with Disabilities by Employers and Co-Workers

Author

Listed:
  • Alicja Grześkowiak

    (Department of Econometrics and Operational Research, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, 53-345 Wrocław, Poland)

  • Urszula Załuska

    (Department of Logistics, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, 53-345 Wrocław, Poland)

  • Cyprian Kozyra

    (Department of Statistics, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, 53-345 Wrocław, Poland)

  • Dorota Kwiatkowska-Ciotucha

    (Department of Logistics, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, 53-345 Wrocław, Poland)

Abstract

The perception of people with disabilities is crucial for their full inclusion and in order that they might stay economically active. The measurement tools used should be resistant to the demographic or professional characteristics of the research participants. The article attempts to test this resistance for one of the most popular tools measuring the perception of people with disabilities in everyday life—the Attitudes to Disability Scale (ADS) test developed by the WHOQOL Group. Another issue raised in the article is the acceptance of people with various types of disabilities in terms of their possible employment. We checked the differentiation of acceptance among employers from different countries. This article uses representative samples of respondents from two studies—the CATI research (2019) on samples of Polish employers and co-workers, and the CAWI research (2021) on samples of employers from Poland and Finland. The analysis methods used included confirmatory factor analysis, nested models and nonparametric analysis of variance. The research confirmed the resistance of the ADS scale to respondents’ characteristics, and found no differences for nested models constructed for groups based on categorical variables characterizing the respondents. As for acceptance of various types of disability in the workplace, significant differences were found in the statements of employers from Poland and Finland.

Suggested Citation

  • Alicja Grześkowiak & Urszula Załuska & Cyprian Kozyra & Dorota Kwiatkowska-Ciotucha, 2021. "Perception and Acceptance of People with Disabilities by Employers and Co-Workers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-17, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:10:p:5278-:d:555509
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/10/5278/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/10/5278/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nadeem Khan & Nada Korac‐Kakabadse & Antonis Skouloudis & Andreas Dimopoulos, 2019. "Diversity in the workplace: An overview of disability employment disclosures among UK firms," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1), pages 170-185, January.
    2. Urszula Załuska & Alicja Grześkowiak & Cyprian Kozyra & Dorota Kwiatkowska-Ciotucha, 2020. "Measurement of Factors Affecting the Perception of People with Disabilities in the Workplace," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-15, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alicja Grześkowiak & Urszula Załuska & Dorota Kwiatkowska-Ciotucha & Cyprian Kozyra, 2021. "People with Disabilities in the Workplace: Results of a Survey Conducted among Polish and Finnish Employers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-14, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Silvia Sinicropi & Damiano Cortese, 2021. "(Re)Thinking diversity within sustainable development: A systematic mapping study," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1), pages 299-309, January.
    2. Urszula Załuska & Alicja Grześkowiak & Cyprian Kozyra & Dorota Kwiatkowska-Ciotucha, 2020. "Ambassador of People with Disabilities in the Workplace—Conducive Demographic and Professional Characteristics," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-18, September.
    3. Iwona Radlińska & Marta Kożybska & Beata Karakiewicz, 2021. "Attitudes of Polish Medical and Health Sciences Students towards Persons with Physical Disabilities Using the MAS-PL Scale," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-13, July.
    4. Antônio Luiz Marques & Marina Romeo & Marjorye Matalinares & Montserrat Yepes-Baldó, 2020. "Managers’ Conceptions and Their Effects on the Perception of Employees with Disabilities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-14, September.
    5. Alicja Grześkowiak & Urszula Załuska & Dorota Kwiatkowska-Ciotucha & Cyprian Kozyra, 2021. "People with Disabilities in the Workplace: Results of a Survey Conducted among Polish and Finnish Employers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-14, October.
    6. Jinsoo Hwang & Jinkyung Jenny Kim & Seokhoon Lee, 2020. "The Importance of Philanthropic Corporate Social Responsibility and Its Impact on Attitude and Behavioral Intentions: The Moderating Role of the Barista Disability Status," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-17, August.
    7. Chi Kin Kwan, 2020. "Socially responsible human resource practices to improve the employability of people with disabilities," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 1-8, January.
    8. Megumi Suto & Hitoshi Takehara, 2022. "Employee‐oriented corporate social responsibility, innovation, and firm value," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(4), pages 765-778, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:10:p:5278-:d:555509. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.