IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v15y2018i4p590-d137996.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding Outdoor Gyms in Public Open Spaces: A Systematic Review and Integrative Synthesis of Qualitative and Quantitative Evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Janet Lok Chun Lee

    (Department of Social Work and Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

  • Temmy Lee Ting Lo

    (Department of Social Work and Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

  • Rainbow Tin Hung Ho

    (Department of Social Work and Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
    Centre on Behavioral Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
    Sau Po Centre on Ageing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

Abstract

(1) Background: An outdoor gym (OG) is environmental infrastructure built in a public open space to promote structured physical activity. The provision of OGs is increasingly seen as an important strategy to realize public health agendas promoting habitual physical activity. A systematic review was conducted to synthesize characteristics of OG and OG users’ experiences and perceptions in different cultural contexts; (2) Methods: Online searches of multidisciplinary databases were conducted in health, sport and recreation, and urban planning disciplines. Characteristics of OGs were synthesized by integrating evidence from quantitative, qualitative, and mix-methods studies. The experiences and perceptions of OG users from both qualitative data and survey responses were synthesized through framework analysis; (3) Results: Nine studies met the inclusion criteria (three quantitative studies, four mixed-methods studies, and two pure qualitative studies). None were excluded on the basis of quality. OGs mainly serve adult and older adult population groups. Their size, design, and instructional support vary across studies. The inclusion of functional types of equipment did not have a unified standard. Regarding experiences and perceptions of OGs, five major themes emerged: “health”, “social connectedness”, “affordable”, “support”, and “design and promotion”; (4) Conclusions: The OG characteristics synthesis guides the direction in further studies regarding exploration of design parameters. The qualitative and quantitative synthesis revealed that health was a central theme of users’ experiences. OGs are also spaces where community-dwellers can find social connectedness while participating in structured physical activity at no cost. Findings from this review create knowledge support for OG as environmental infrastructure for further research and facilitate the understanding of users’ experiences and perceptions of OGs in different cultural contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Janet Lok Chun Lee & Temmy Lee Ting Lo & Rainbow Tin Hung Ho, 2018. "Understanding Outdoor Gyms in Public Open Spaces: A Systematic Review and Integrative Synthesis of Qualitative and Quantitative Evidence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-15, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:4:p:590-:d:137996
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/4/590/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/4/590/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rodrigo Mora, 2012. "Moving Bodies: Open Gyms and Physical Activity in Santiago," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 485-497.
    2. Brownson, R.C. & Baker, E.A. & Housemann, R.A. & Brennan, L.K. & Bacak, S.J., 2001. "Environmental and policy determinants of physical activity in the United States," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 91(12), pages 1995-2003.
    3. Katarina Ana Lestan & Ivan Eržen & Mojca Golobič, 2014. "The Role of Open Space in Urban Neighbourhoods for Health-Related Lifestyle," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-24, June.
    4. Meghan A Bohren & Joshua P Vogel & Erin C Hunter & Olha Lutsiv & Suprita K Makh & João Paulo Souza & Carolina Aguiar & Fernando Saraiva Coneglian & Alex Luíz Araújo Diniz & Özge Tunçalp & Dena Javadi , 2015. "The Mistreatment of Women during Childbirth in Health Facilities Globally: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-32, June.
    5. Hsueh-wen Chow & Andrew J. Mowen & Guan-lin Wu, 2017. "Who Is Using Outdoor Fitness Equipment and How? The Case of Xihu Park," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-12, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hsueh-wen Chow & Dai-Rong Wu, 2019. "Outdoor Fitness Equipment Usage Behaviors in Natural Settings," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Rafael A. Alamilla & Navin Kaushal & Silvia M. Bigatti & NiCole R. Keith, 2025. "Comparing Barriers and Facilitators to Physical ActivityAmong Underrepresented Minorities: Preliminary Outcomes from a Mixed-Methods Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(2), pages 1-28, February.
    3. Stafford, Mai & Cummins, Steven & Ellaway, Anne & Sacker, Amanda & Wiggins, Richard D. & Macintyre, Sally, 2007. "Pathways to obesity: Identifying local, modifiable determinants of physical activity and diet," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(9), pages 1882-1897, November.
    4. Narayani Paudel Ghimire & Sunil Kumar Joshi & Pranab Dahal & Katarina Swahnberg, 2021. "Women’s Experience of Disrespect and Abuse during Institutional Delivery in Biratnagar, Nepal," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-10, September.
    5. Zhonghua Gou & Xiaohuan Xie & Yi Lu & Maryam Khoshbakht, 2018. "Quality of Life (QoL) Survey in Hong Kong: Understanding the Importance of Housing Environment and Needs of Residents from Different Housing Sectors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-16, January.
    6. Greta Helen Bladh, 2022. "Spatial Bodies: Vulnerable Inclusiveness within Gyms and Fitness Venues in Sweden," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, October.
    7. Katarina Swahnberg & Anke Zbikowski & Kumudu Wijewardene & Agneta Josephson & Prembarsha Khadka & Dinesh Jeyakumaran & Udari Mambulage & Jennifer J. Infanti, 2019. "Can Forum Play Contribute to Counteracting Abuse in Health Care? A Pilot Intervention Study in Sri Lanka," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-10, May.
    8. Rena Bakker & Ephrem D Sheferaw & Jelle Stekelenburg & Tegbar Yigzaw & Marlou L A de Kroon, 2020. "Development and use of a scale to assess gender differences in appraisal of mistreatment during childbirth among Ethiopian midwifery students," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, January.
    9. Brewer, Mackenzie & Kimbro, Rachel Tolbert, 2014. "Neighborhood context and immigrant children's physical activity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 1-9.
    10. Emanuelle Pessa Valente & Ilaria Mariani & Benedetta Covi & Marzia Lazzerini, 2022. "Quality of Informed Consent Practices around the Time of Childbirth: A Cross-Sectional Study in Italy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-13, June.
    11. Dinusha Perera & Muzrif Munas & Katarina Swahnberg & Kumudu Wijewardene & Jennifer J. Infanti & on behalf of the ADVANCE Study Group, 2022. "Obstetric Violence Is Prevalent in Routine Maternity Care: A Cross-Sectional Study of Obstetric Violence and Its Associated Factors among Pregnant Women in Sri Lanka’s Colombo District," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-13, August.
    12. Cerin, Ester & Leslie, Eva & Owen, Neville, 2009. "Explaining socio-economic status differences in walking for transport: An ecological analysis of individual, social and environmental factors," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1013-1020, March.
    13. Torrisi, Orsola & Svallfors, Signe & Gargiulo, Maria, 2024. "Obstetric violence in the context of community violence: The case of Mexico," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 360(C).
    14. Perge,Emilie Bernadette & Llopis Abella,Jimena & Fruttero,Anna, 2023. "Structural and Behavioral Barriers to Improving Development Outcomes : The Case ofMaternal Care in Haiti," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10421, The World Bank.
    15. Tashi Dendup & Xiaoqi Feng & Stephanie Clingan & Thomas Astell-Burt, 2018. "Environmental Risk Factors for Developing Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-25, January.
    16. Trish Muzenda & Maylene Shung-King & Estelle Victoria Lambert & Anna Brugulat Panés & Amy Weimann & Nicole McCreedy & Lambed Tatah & Clarisse Mapa-Tassou & Ishtar Govia & Vincent Were & Tolu Oni, 2022. "Three Growth Spurts in Global Physical Activity Policies between 2000 and 2019: A Policy Document Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-20, March.
    17. Rachel Tolbert Kimbro & Jeanne Brooks-Gunn & Sara McLanahan, 2010. "Neighborhood Context, Poverty, and Urban Children's Outdoor Play," Working Papers 1226, Princeton University, School of Public and International Affairs, Center for Research on Child Wellbeing..
    18. Katie Burford & Leigh Ann Ganzar & Kevin Lanza & Harold W. Kohl & Deanna M. Hoelscher, 2021. "School-Level Economic Disparities in Police-Reported Crimes and Active Commuting to School," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-13, October.
    19. Rachael E. Collins & Diano F. Marrone, 2015. "Scared Sick," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(3), pages 21582440156, August.
    20. Mörtberg, Ulla & Goldenberg, Romain & Kalantari, Zahra & Kordas, Olga & Deal, Brian & Balfors, Berit & Cvetkovic, Vladimir, 2017. "Integrating ecosystem services in the assessment of urban energy trajectories – A study of the Stockholm Region," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 338-349.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:4:p:590-:d:137996. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.